Putting ‘glamour’ back into practice thinking: Implications for social and community development work

Australian Social Work

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 292-302

  Martinez Brawley, Emilia E ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

community development philosophy; community inquiry; inquiry into practice; social work practice philosophy; social work research; social work ways of thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010617783     PISSN: 0312407X     EISSN: 14470748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03124070208410987     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berlin, SB. 1990. Dichotomous and Complex Thinking. Social Science Review, 64 (1): 46–59.
2. Chambon, A S., Irving, A, and Epstein, L, eds. 1999. Reading Foucault for Social Work, New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Cheers, B. 1999. Welfare Bushed: Social Care in Rural Australia, Aldershot, England: Avebury.
4. Dalla Rosa, G. 1996. “ Experiencias y Conceptos Teoricos para una Formacion Superior de los Agentes de Desarrollo Local. ”. In Desarrollo Local Y Medio Ambiente. La lniciativa Comunitaria Leader, Tarancon Diputacion de Cuenca, Edited by: Varcarcel-Resalt, G, Troitino-Vinuesa, MA, and Cava, LE. Spain: Cuenca.
5. Deroos, YS. 1990. The Development of Practice Wisdom Through Human Problem-Solving Processes. Social Service Review, 64 (2): 276–287.
6. Diesing, P. 1991. How Does Social Science Work? Reflections on Practice, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
7. Erlandson, D A., Harris, E L., Skipper, BL, and Allen, SD. 1993. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Fay, B. 1996. “ Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science. ”. In A Multicultural Approach, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
9. Friedman, TM. 1999. The Lexus and the Olive Tree., New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
10. Gardner, H. 2001. The Philosophy of Science Continuum. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47 (26): B7–B10.
11. Gergen, KJ. 1982. Toward Transformafion in Social Knowledge, New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Goldstein, H. 1986. Toward the Integration of Theory and Practice: A Humanistic Approach. Social Work, 31 (5): 352–357.
13. Hadley, R, and McGrath, M. 1980. Going Local: Neighborhood Social Services., London: Eedford Square Press.
14. Hartman, A. 1990. Editorial: Many Ways of Knowing. Social Work, 35 (1): 3–5.
15. Howe, D. 1994. Modernity, Post-modernity and Social Work. British Journal of Social Work, 24 (5): 513–532.
16. Irving, A. 1992. The Scientific Imperative in Canadian Sociai Work and Social Welfare in Canada, 1897-1945. Canadian Social Work Review, 9 (1): 9–27.
17. Leonard, P. 1996. Three Discourses on Practice. a Post-modern Reappraisal. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 23 (2): 7–26.
18. Macintyre, A. 1981. “ After Virtue. ”. In A Study in Moral Theory, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
19. Martinez-Erawley, EE. 1984. Working with the Local Community. Smail Town, 14 (5): 14–21.
20. Martinez-Brawley, EE. 2001. Searching Again and Again. Inclusion, Heterogeneity and Social Work Research. The British Journal of Social Work, 31 (2): 271–285.
21. Martinez-Brawley, EE, and Zorita, P MB. 1998. At the Edge of the Frame Beyond Science and Art in Social Work. The British Journal of Social Work, 28 (2): 197–212.
22. Polanyi, M. 1967. The Tacit Dimension., New York: Doubleday.
23. Revel, JF, and Ricard, M. 1998. The Monk and the Philosopher, New York: Random House.
24. Rosenau, PM. 1992. “ Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences. ”. In Insights, lnroads and intrusions, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
25. Schon, DA. 1995. The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology. Change, 27 (6): 27–34.