Urban middle school teachers’ use of instructional technology

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 178-195

  Clark, Keith D ^a  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Instructional technology; Middle school; Teacher use of computers

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010612843     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782308     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akbaba, S., & Kurubacak, G., (1998). Teachers’ attitudes towards technology. Computers in Social Studies Journal [Online serial], 7(4) Available: Www.webcom.com/journal/akbaba.html.
2. American Library Association. (1989). Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final report. Chicago, IL: Author. Available: Www.ala.org/acrl/niIl/ilit1st.html. (ERIC No. ED 315 074)
3. Bartunek, H., (1990) The classroom teacher as teacher educator. (ERIC Digest 89-7). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. (ERIC No. ED 335 297)
4. Bosch, K. A., & Cardinale, L. (1993). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of computer use during a field experience. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 10(1), 23-27.
5. Bracey, G. W. (1993). Research: Exemplary computer use. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(3), 270-273.
6. Christensen, R., Gilmore, E., Kim, H., Knezek, G., Moonen, B., Morales, C., & Voogt, J. (1999, March) Teacher & student attitudes toward information technology in four nations. Panel presented at Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education’s 10th International Conference, San Antonio, TX.
7. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (1996, January). Constructing the teachers’ attitudes toward computers (TAC) questionnaire. Paper presented to the Southwest Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
8. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (1997). Attitudes toward information technology at two parochial schools in north Texas. (Tech. Rep. No. 97.2). Denton: Texas Center for Educational Technology.
9. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (1998). Attitudes towards information technology among teachers at six Texas middle schools. (Tech. Rep. No. 98.2). Denton: Texas Center for Educational Technology.
10. Collins, R. N. (1988). Will Rogers says: Favorite quotations selected by the Will Rogers Memorial staff Claremore, OK: Will Rogers Heritage Press.
11. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines the classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Educational Testing Service. (1999). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics [Online document]. Princeton, NJ: Author. Available: Www.ets.org/research/textonly/pic/dic/dicfig6.html.
13. FileMaker Pro [Computer software]. (1984-2000). Cupertino, CA: FileMaker, Inc.
14. Frey, R. E. (1990). Thinking about technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 27(4), 67-71.
15. Glenna, T. K., & Melmed, A. (1996). Fostering the use of educational technology: Elements of a national strategy. A Rand report [Online document]. Santa Monica, CA: Rand. Available: Www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR682/contents.html.
16. House, E. R. (1996). A framework for appraising educational reforms. Education Researcher, 25(7), 6-14.
17. Hunt, N. P., & Bohlin, R. M. (1995). Events and practices that promote positive attitudes and emotions in computing courses. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 11 (3), 21-23.
18. Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C. C., Remz, A. R., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (ERIC No. ED 364 220)
19. Morales, C. (1999, March). Attitudes toward computers among students and teachers in Mexico. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education 10th International Conference, San Antonio, TX. Available: Www.tcrt.unt.edulresearch/site99/mexico.htm.
20. Moonen, B., & Voogt, J. (1998, October). Teacher inservice training in network: Result from the first phase. Paper presented at Tel.Ed ‘98: ISTE’s Seventh International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia in Education, New Orleans, LA. Available: Http://users.edte.utwente.nl/moonenb/paperteled8.htm.
21. National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). The condition of education 1998, indicator 3 [Online document]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available: Http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/condition98.
22. National Commission or Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform [Online document]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: Www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk.
23. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996, Fall). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future (Summary report). Teacher to Teacher. Available: Www.nbpts.org/nbpts/about/what matters-html
24. National Educational Goals Panel. (1995). National Education Goals Report 1995: Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. Planow, M., Bauder, D., Carr, D., & Sarrar, R. (1993). Structuring teachers’ attitudinal changes: A follow up study. In J. Willis, D. Carey, R. Carey, & D. Willis (Eds.), Technology and teacher education annual. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
26. Plotnick, E. (1996). Trends in educational technology 1995. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology. (ERIC No. ED 39E 861)
27. Ramirez, R., & Bel, R. (1994). Recent legislative initiatives expected to affect educational technology. Policy briefs, Report 3. In N. Fulford (Ed.), Toward a technology infrastructure for education: Policy perspectives 1 (pp. 26-31). Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (ZRIC No. ED 374 786)
28. Sheingold, K., & Hadlcy, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College of Education, Center for Technology in Education. (ERIC No. ED 322 900)
29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Thomas, L. (1994). NCATE releases new unit accreditation guidelines: Standards for technology are included. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 11(3), 5-7.
31. Thornburg, D. D. (1992). Learning alternatives: Technology in support of lifelong education. In Council of Chief State School Officers (Ed.), Learning technologies essential for educational change (pp. 3-28). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. (ERIC No. ED 349 967)
32. Topp, N. W., Mortensen, R., & Grandgenett, N. (1995). Building a technology using faculty to facilitate technology-using teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 11(3), 11-14.
33. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on: New tools for teaching on learning. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
34. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers & technology: Making the connection. OTA report summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35. Widmer, C. C., & Amburgey, V. (1994). Meeting technology guidelines for teacher preparation. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 10(2), 12-16.