Can juniors read graphs? A review and analysis of some computer-based activities

Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 49-58

  Phillips, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010612354     PISSN: 0962029X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14759399700200005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Avons, S.E., Beveridge, M.C., Hickman, A.T. & Hitch, G.J. (1983) Teaching journey graphs with microcomputer animation, Human Learning, 2, pp. 93-105
2. Bell, A., Brekke, G. & Swan, M. (1987) Diagnostic teaching: Graphical interpretation, Mathematics Teaching, 119, pp. 56-59
3. Berg, C. A. & Smith, P. (1994) Assessing students’ abilities to construct and interpret line graphs, Science Education, 78, pp. 527-554
4. Corcoran. J. (1991) Data logging with 7- and 8-year-olds, “Microscope, 32, pp. 45-49
5. Janvier, C. (1978) The interpretation of complex Cartesian graphs representing situations. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham
6. Jones, A. (1993) The pocketbook project, “Microscope, 40, pp. 19-22
7. Kerslake D. (1981) Graphs, in K.M. Hart (Ed.) Children’s understanding of Mathematics, pp. 11-16, 120-136. London: John Murray
8. McFarlane, A. (1994) Not just a pretty picture, Micromath, 10(2), p. 48
9. Mercer, A. (1994) Two lessons with the motion sensor: Lesson 1, Micromath, 10(2), pp. 26-28
10. Morgan, C. (1992) Look at that big noise! Micromath, 8(2), pp. 10-13
11. Morgan, C. (1993) Where data handling meets information technology. Can new resources enable children to interpret graphs more readily? “Microscope, 38, pp. 19-21
12. Morgan, C. (1994) The coefficient of ferocity, Micromath, 10(2), pp. 35-38
13. Padilla, M.J., McKenzie, D.L. & Shaw, E.L. (1986) An examination of the line graphing ability of students in grades seven through twelve, School Science and Mathematics, 86, pp. 20-26
14. Phillips, R.J. (1980) How the microcomputer can broaden the experience of learning to understand graphs, ITMA Newsletter, 5, pp. 4-9
15. Phillips, R.J. (1986) Computer graphics as a memory aid and a thinking aid, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2, pp. 37-44
16. Pratt, D. (1994) Active graphing in a computer-rich environment, in J.P. Da Ponte & J.F. Matos (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 18), IV, pp. 57-64
17. Pratt, D. (1995) Young children’s active and passive graphing, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 11, pp. 157-169
18. Preece, J. & Janvier, C. (1993) Interpreting trends in multiple-curve graphs of ecological situations: The role of context, International journal of Science Education, 15, pp. 199-212
19. Stea, D. & Blaut, J.M. (1973) Some preliminary observations on spatial learning in school children, in R.M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds) Image and Environment. London: Edward Arnold
20. Stewart, J. (1983) Does the use of the microcomputer inhibit the development of language in children? in D. Chandler (Ed.) Exploring English with Microcomputers. London: CET
21. Swan, M. (Ed) (1986) The Language of Functions and Graphs. Nottingham: Shell Centre for Mathematical Education
22. Swatton, P & Taylor, R.M. (1994) Pupil performance in graphical tasks and its relationship to the ability to handle variables, British Educational Research Journal, 20, pp. 227-243
23. Tufte, E.R. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press
24. Vernon, M.D. (1946) Learning from graphical material, British Journal of Psychology, 36, pp. 145-158