How could contemporary social theory contribute to socialized epistemology?

Social Epistemology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 27-41

  Poutanen, Seppo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010612282     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691720110049224     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Audi, R., 1998, Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (London and New York: Routledge).
2. Benhabib, S., 1995, Feminism and Postmodernism. In L. Nicholson (ed.) Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (New York and London: Routledge), pp. 17-34.
3. Brewer, J., 1990, Talking about danger: the RUC and the paramilitary threat. Sociology, 24, 657-674.
4. Butchvarov, P., 1995, Metaphysics. In R. Audi (ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press), pp. 489-491.
5. Butler, J., 1995, Contingent foundations. In L. Nicholson (ed.) Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (New York and London: Routledge), pp. 35-58.
6. Code, L., 1998, Epistemology. In A. M. Jaggar and I. M. Young (eds) A Companion to Feminist Philosophy (Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 173-184.
7. Feldman, R., 1999, Methodological naturalism in epistemology. In J.Greco and E. Sosa The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 170-186.
8. Foucault, M., 1977, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
9. Foucault, M., 1980, Power/Knowledge (Brighton: Harvester).
10. Fricker, M., 2000, Feminism in epistemology: pluralism without postmodernism. In M. Fricker and J. Hornsby (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge university Press), pp. 145-165.
11. Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society (Oxford: Polity Press).
12. Gilbert, M., 1994, Remarks on collective belief. In F. F. Schmitt (ed.) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (Lanham and London: Rowman & Littlefield), pp. 235-256.
13. Harding, S., 1996, Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is strong objectivity? In E. F. Keller and H. E. Longino (eds) Feminism & Science (oxford and New York: oxford university Press), pp. 235-248.
14. Hardwig, J., 1991, The role of trust in knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 12, 693-708.
15. Hilbert, R., 1990, Ethnomethodology and the micro-macro order. American Sociological Review, 55, 794-808.
16. Kapitan, T., 1995, Free will problem. In R. Audi (ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press), pp. 280-282.
17. Keller, E. F., 1995, Language and ideology in evolutionary theory: reading cultural norms into natural law. In E. F. Keller and H. E. Longino (eds) Feminism & Science (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 154-173.
18. Kincaid, H., 1996, Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences (Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press).
19. Kitcher, P., 1994, Contrasting conceptions of social epistemology. In F. F. Schmitt (ed.) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (Lanham and London: Rowman & Littlefield), pp. 111-134.
20. Kornblith, H., 1994, A conservative approach to social epistemology. In F. F. Schmitt (ed.) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (Lanham and London: Roman & Littlefield), pp. 93-110.
21. Layder, D., 1997, Modern Social Theory: Key Debates and New Directions (London and Bristol: UCL Press).
22. Layder, D., 1998, The reality of social domains: implications for theory and method. In T. May and M. Williams (eds) Knowing the Social World (Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press), pp. 86-102.
23. Longino, H. E., 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
24. Longino, H. E., 1996, Subjects, power, and knowledge: description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. In E. F. Keller and H. E. Longino (eds) Feminism & Science (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 264-279.
25. Longino, H. E. and Doell, R., 1996, Body, bias, and behaviours: a comparative analysis of reasoning in two areas of biological science. In E. F. Keller and H. E. Longino (eds) Feminism & Science (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 73-90.
26. Maffie, J., 1990, Recent work on naturalized epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly, 27, 281-293.
27. Moser, P. K., 1995, Epistemology. In R. Audi (ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press), p. 237.
28. Nelson, L. H., 1990, Who Knows? From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
29. Quine, W. V. O., 1969, Epistemology naturalized. In W. V. O. Quine Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 59-90.
30. Rose, H., 2000, Colonising the social sciences? In H. Rose and S. Rose (eds) Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology (London: Jonathan Cape), pp. 106-128.
31. Scheman, N., 1993, Though this be method, yet there is madness in it: paranoia and liberal epistemology. In L. M. Antony and C. Witt (eds) A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason & Objectivity (Boulder, San Francisco and Oxford: Westview Press), pp. 145-170.
32. Schmitt, F. F., 1994, Socializing epistemology: an introduction through two sample issues. In F. F. Schmitt (ed.) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (Lanham and London: Rowman & Littlefield), pp. 128.
33. Tanesini, A., 1999, An Introduction to Feminist Epistemologies (Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell).
34. Walsh, D. F., 1998, Structure/agency. In C. Jenks (ed.) Core Sociological Dichomtomies (London, Thousand Oaks a nd New Delhi: Sage), pp. 8-33.
35. Webb, M. O., 1995, Feminist epistemology and the extent of the social. Hypatia, 3, 85-98.
36. Williams, M., 2000, Science and Social Science: An Introduction (London and New York: Routledge).