메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 263-285

Voter mobilization in judicial retention elections: Performance evaluations and organized opposition

(1)  Olson, Susan M a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 85010543199     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2001.10767647     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (5)

References (54)
  • 2
    • 0347594505 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trends in Judicial Retention Elections, 1964-1998
    • ASPIN, L. (1999). “Trends in Judicial Retention Elections, 1964-1998,” 83 Judicature 79
    • (1999) Judicature , vol.83 , pp. 79
    • Aspin, L.1
  • 3
    • 0001982267 scopus 로고
    • Electing Judges
    • L. Epstein (ed.), Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press
    • BAUM, L. (1995). “Electing Judges,” in L. Epstein (ed.), Contemplating Courts. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press
    • (1995) Contemplating Courts
    • Baum, L.1
  • 5
    • 24944520576 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Judicial Performance Evaluations by State Governments: Informing the Public While Avoiding the Pitfalls
    • BRODY, D. C. (2000). “Judicial Performance Evaluations by State Governments: Informing the Public While Avoiding the Pitfalls,” 21 Justice System Journal 331
    • (2000) Justice System Journal , vol.21 , pp. 331
    • Brody, D.C.1
  • 11
    • 0002216023 scopus 로고
    • Rose Bird and the Politics of Judicial Accountability in California
    • CULVER, J. H., and J. T. WOLD (1986). “Rose Bird and the Politics of Judicial Accountability in California,” 70 Judicature 81
    • (1986) Judicature , vol.70 , pp. 81
    • Culver, J.H.1    Wold, J.T.2
  • 12
    • 85010572985 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Salt Lake Tribune, October 23
    • EDITORIAL (1996). “Voters, Judges on Trial,” Salt Lake Tribune, October 23, at A8
    • (1996) Voters, Judges on Trial
  • 13
    • 0347877302 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Judicial Accountability the Right Way: Official Performance Evaluations Help the Electorate as well as the Bench
    • ESTERLING, K. (1999). “Judicial Accountability the Right Way: Official Performance Evaluations Help the Electorate as well as the Bench,” 82 Judicature 206
    • (1999) Judicature , vol.82 , pp. 206
    • Esterling, K.1
  • 16
    • 79956121151 scopus 로고
    • Why the ‘Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change
    • GALANTER, M. (1974). “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law and Society Review 95
    • (1974) Law and Society Review , vol.9 , pp. 95
    • Galanter, M.1
  • 17
    • 24944588394 scopus 로고
    • Judging the Judges
    • GRIFFIN, J. (1995). “Judging the Judges,” 21 Litigation 5
    • (1995) Litigation , vol.21 , pp. 5
    • Griffin, J.1
  • 18
    • 0003062333 scopus 로고
    • Merit Retention Elections: What Influences the Voters
    • GRIFFIN, K., and M. HORAN (1979). “Merit Retention Elections: What Influences the Voters,” 63 Judicature 78
    • (1979) Judicature , vol.63 , pp. 78
    • Griffin, K.1    Horan, M.2
  • 19
    • 0042423757 scopus 로고
    • Distance from the Bench and Retention Voting Behavior: A Comparison of Trial Court and Appellate Court Retention Elections
    • HALL, W. K., and L. T. ASPIN (1992). “Distance from the Bench and Retention Voting Behavior: A Comparison of Trial Court and Appellate Court Retention Elections,” 15 Justice System Journal 801
    • (1992) Justice System Journal , vol.15 , pp. 801
    • Hall, W.K.1    Aspin, L.T.2
  • 20
    • 0000771211 scopus 로고
    • What Twenty Years of Judicial Retention Elections Have Told Us
    • HALL, W. K., and L. T. ASPIN (1987). “What Twenty Years of Judicial Retention Elections Have Told Us,” 70 Judicature 340
    • (1987) Judicature , vol.70 , pp. 340
    • Hall, W.K.1    Aspin, L.T.2
  • 21
    • 0008998508 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Judicial Accountability and Independence: Balancing Incompatibles?
    • HANDBERG, R. (1997). “Judicial Accountability and Independence: Balancing Incompatibles?” 49 University of Miami Law Review 127
    • (1997) University of Miami Law Review , vol.49 , pp. 127
    • Handberg, R.1
  • 28
    • 84937185198 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Judicial Performance Evaluation in the States
    • KEARNEY, R. C. (1999). “Judicial Performance Evaluation in the States,” 22 Public Administration Quarterly 468
    • (1999) Public Administration Quarterly , vol.22 , pp. 468
    • Kearney, R.C.1
  • 29
    • 85010531733 scopus 로고
    • Judicial Performance Evaluation Comes of Age
    • KEILITZ, S., and J. W. MCBRIDE (1992). “Judicial Performance Evaluation Comes of Age,” 16:1 State Court Journal 4
    • (1992) State Court Journal , vol.16 , Issue.1 , pp. 4
    • Keilitz, S.1    McBride, J.W.2
  • 31
    • 84912656800 scopus 로고
    • Voters in Contested, Non-partisan Judicial Elections: A Responsible Electorate or a Problematic Public?
    • LOVRICH, N., and C. SHELDON (1983). “Voters in Contested, Non-partisan Judicial Elections: A Responsible Electorate or a Problematic Public?” 36 Western Political Quarterly 241
    • (1983) Western Political Quarterly , vol.36 , pp. 241
    • Lovrich, N.1    Sheldon, C.2
  • 38
    • 84971922282 scopus 로고
    • Interest Groups and Theories of Power in America
    • MCFARLAND, A. S. (1987). “Interest Groups and Theories of Power in America,” 17 British Journal of Political Science 129
    • (1987) British Journal of Political Science , vol.17 , pp. 129
    • McFarland, A.S.1
  • 39
    • 0009040526 scopus 로고
    • Choosing Judges: Do the Voters Know What Theyre Doing?
    • MCKNIGHT, R. N., R. SHAEFER, and C. A. JOHNSON (1978). “Choosing Judges: Do the Voters Know What They’re Doing?” 62 Judicature 94
    • (1978) Judicature , vol.62 , pp. 94
    • McKnight, R.N.1    Shaefer, R.2    Johnson, C.A.3
  • 40
    • 24944443797 scopus 로고
    • Judicial Revision: An Argument Against the Merit Plan for Judicial Selection and Tenure
    • MULLINAX, O. (1973-74). “Judicial Revision: An Argument Against the Merit Plan for Judicial Selection and Tenure,” 5 Texas Tech Law Review 32
    • (1973) Texas Tech Law Review , vol.5 , pp. 32
    • Mullinax, O.1
  • 41
    • 0033239327 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Competing Narratives in a Judicial Retention Election: Feminism versus Judicial Independence
    • OLSON, S., and C. BATJER (1999). “Competing Narratives in a Judicial Retention Election: Feminism versus Judicial Independence,” 33 Law and Society Review 123
    • (1999) Law and Society Review , vol.33 , pp. 123
    • Olson, S.1    Batjer, C.2
  • 44
    • 0010156907 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Politicization of Judicial Retention Elections: The Defeat of Justices Lanphier and White
    • Chicago: American Judicature Society
    • REID, T. V. (2000). “The Politicization of Judicial Retention Elections: The Defeat of Justices Lanphier and White,” in Research on Judicial Selection, 1999. Chicago: American Judicature Society
    • (2000) Research on Judicial Selection, 1999
    • Reid, T.V.1
  • 45
    • 0346963452 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Politicization of Retention Elections: Lessons from the Defeat of Justices Lanphier and White
    • REID, T. V. (1999). “The Politicization of Retention Elections: Lessons from the Defeat of Justices Lanphier and White,” 83 Judicature 68
    • (1999) Judicature , vol.83-68
    • Reid, T.V.1
  • 48
    • 0012572327 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics
    • ROTTMAN, D. B. (1998). State Court Organization. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics
    • (1998) State Court Organization
    • Rottman, D.B.1
  • 49
    • 1942426314 scopus 로고
    • Knowledge and Judicial Voting: The Oregon and Washington Experience
    • SHELDON, C. H., and N. P. LOVRICH, JR. (1983). “Knowledge and Judicial Voting: The Oregon and Washington Experience,” 67 Judicature 234
    • (1983) Judicature , vol.67 , pp. 234
    • Sheldon, C.H.1    Lovrich, N.P.2
  • 50
    • 85010575688 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Report of Special Committee on Judicial Evaluations
    • SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL EVALUATIONS. (2000). “Report of Special Committee on Judicial Evaluations,” Hawaii Bar Journal, February, at 6
    • (2000) Hawaii bar Journal, February, At , pp. 6
  • 52
    • 84935632319 scopus 로고
    • What Is Procedural Justice?: Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures
    • TYLER, T. R. (1988). “What Is Procedural Justice?: Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures,” 22 Law and Society Review 103
    • (1988) Law and Society Review , vol.22 , pp. 103
    • Tyler, T.R.1
  • 54
    • 0001662725 scopus 로고
    • The Defeat of the California Justices: The Campaign, the Election, and the Issue of Judicial Accountability
    • WOLD, J. T., and J. H. CULVER (1987). “The Defeat of the California Justices: The Campaign, the Election, and the Issue of Judicial Accountability,” 70 Judicature 348
    • (1987) Judicature , vol.70 , pp. 348
    • Wold, J.T.1    Culver, J.H.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.