Commentary on “Clients’ Perceptions of Treatment for Depression: I and II”

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 263-268

  Rennie, David L ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010506447     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503309612331331788     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bazerman, L. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Elliott, R. (1986). Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR) as a process research method. In L. Greenberg & W. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 503-527). New York: Guilford.
4. Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anachronistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
5. Gadamer, H-G. (1992). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Translated and revised by J. Wein-sheimer & G. Marshall. New York: Crossroads. (Originally published 1960).
6. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
7. Gershefski, J. J., Arnkoff, D. B., Glass, C. R., & Elkin, I. (1996). Clients’ perceptions of treatment for depression: I. Helpful aspects. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 245-259.
8. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Change process research. foumal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 4-9.
9. Hill, C. E. (1989). Therapist techniques and client outcomes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Hill, C. E., Helms, J. E., Spiegel, S. B., & Tiche-nor, V. (1988). Development of a system for categorizing client reactions to therapist interventions. foumal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 27-36.
11. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., Cogar, M. C., & Denman, D. W. III. (1993). Beneath the surface of long-term therapy: Therapist and client report on their own and each other’s covert process, foumal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 278-287.
12. Hoshmand, L. (1989). Alternate research paradigms: A review and teaching proposals. The Counseling Psychologist, 17, 3-79.
13. Kagan, N. (1975). Interpersonal Process Recall: A method for influencing human action. (Available from N. Kagan, Educational Psychology Department, University of Houston, University Park, Houston, TX, 77004).
14. Levy, J. A., Glass, C. R., Arnkoff, D. B., Ger-shefski, J. J., & Elkin, I. (1996). Clients’ perceptions of treatment for depression: II. Problematic or hindering aspects. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 260-274.
15. Lietaer, G. (1992). Helping and hindering processes in client-centered/experiential psychotherapy. In S. Toukmanian & D. Rennie (Eds.), Psychotherapy process research: Paradigmatic and narrative approaches (pp. 134-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Margolis, J. (1986). The persistence of reality I: Pragmatism without foundations: Reconciling realism and relativism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
17. Margolis, J. (1995). Interpretation radical but not unruly: The new puzzle of the arts and history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Nelson, J. S., Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (Eds.) (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and human affairs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19. Phillips, J. R. (1984). Influences on personal growth as viewed by former psychotherapy patients. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2820B.
20. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. New York: Albany.
21. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22. Rennie, D. L. (1994a). Clients’ deference in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 427-437.
23. Rennie, D. L. (1994b). Clients’ accounts of resistance in counseling. A qualitative analysis. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 28, 43-57.
24. Rennie, D. L. (1994c). Human science and counseling psychology: Closing the gap between research and practice. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 235-250.
25. Rennie, D. L. (in press). Grounded theory methodology: The pressing need for a coherent logic of justification. Theory & Psychology.
26. Rennie, D. L. (1995a). On the rhetorics of social science: Let’s not conflate natural science and human science. The Humanistic Psychologist, 23, 321-332.
27. Rennie, D. L. (1995b). Plausible constructionism as the rigor of qualitative research. Methods-. A journal for Human Science, annual ed. hoc.
28. Rennie, D. L. & Toukmanian, S. G. (1992). Explanation in psychotherapy process research. In S. Toukmanian & D. Rennie (Eds.), Psychotherapy process research: Paradigmatic and narrative approaches (pp. 234-251). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Rice, L. N. & Greenberg, L. S. (1984). The new research paradigm. In L. Rice & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Patterns of change: Comprehensive analysis of psychotherapy process (pp. 7-25). New York: Guilford.
30. Sexton, T. L. & Whiston, S. C. (1994). The status of the counseling relationship: An empirical review, theoretical implications, and research directions. The Counseling Psychologist, 22, 6-78.
31. Spiegelberg, H. (1960). The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction, Vols. 1 & 2. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
32. Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 25, 4-51.
33. Toukmanian, S. G. & Rennie, D. L. (Eds.) (1992). Psychotherapy process research: Paradigmatic and narrative approaches. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Watson, J. C. & Rennie, D. L. (1994). A qualitative analysis of clients’ subjective experience of exploring problematic reactions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 500-509.