-
1
-
-
62349085161
-
Protocols, probity, and publication
-
Summerskill W, Collingridge D, Frankish H. Protocols, probity, and publication. Lancet. 2009;373(9668):992.
-
(2009)
Lancet
, vol.373
, Issue.9668
, pp. 992
-
-
Summerskill, W.1
Collingridge, D.2
Frankish, H.3
-
2
-
-
0037164338
-
The power of the protocol
-
Lassere M, Johnson K. The power of the protocol. Lancet. 2002;360(9346):1620-2.
-
(2002)
Lancet
, vol.360
, Issue.9346
, pp. 1620-1622
-
-
Lassere, M.1
Johnson, K.2
-
3
-
-
10644249859
-
Trial protocols at the BMJ
-
Jones G, Abbasi K. Trial protocols at the BMJ. BMJ. 2004;329(7479):1360.
-
(2004)
BMJ
, vol.329
, Issue.7479
, pp. 1360
-
-
Jones, G.1
Abbasi, K.2
-
4
-
-
85010338261
-
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E6 Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guidance
-
dated April 1996. Accessed 19 Dec 2016.
-
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E6 Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guidance, dated April 1996. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/./Guidances/ucm073122.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2016.
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
33745717714
-
Lead editorial: Trials - using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
-
Altman DG, Furberg CD, Grimshaw JM, Rothwell PM. Lead editorial: Trials - using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials. Trials. 2006;7:6.
-
(2006)
Trials.
, vol.7
, pp. 6
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
Furberg, C.D.2
Grimshaw, J.M.3
Rothwell, P.M.4
-
6
-
-
17844372209
-
Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1)
-
A published erratum appears in BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1258.
-
Krleža-Jerić K, Chan AW, Dickersin K, Sim I, Grimshaw J, Gluud C. Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1). BMJ. 2005;330(7497):956-8. A published erratum appears in BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1258.
-
BMJ. 2005
, vol.330
, Issue.7497
, pp. 956-958
-
-
Krleža-Jerić, K.1
Chan, A.W.2
Dickersin, K.3
Sim, I.4
Grimshaw, J.5
Gluud, C.6
-
7
-
-
84892614609
-
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
-
Chan AW, Song F, Vickers A, Jefferson T, Dickersin K, Gøtzsche PC, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):257-66.
-
(2014)
Lancet
, vol.383
, Issue.9913
, pp. 257-266
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Song, F.2
Vickers, A.3
Jefferson, T.4
Dickersin, K.5
Gøtzsche, P.C.6
-
8
-
-
84995543060
-
Trial reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov-the final rule
-
Zarin DA, Tse T, Williams RJ, Carr S. Trial reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov-the final rule. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1998-2004.
-
(2016)
N Engl J Med
, vol.375
, Issue.20
, pp. 1998-2004
-
-
Zarin, D.A.1
Tse, T.2
Williams, R.J.3
Carr, S.4
-
9
-
-
84995810464
-
Toward a new era of trust and transparency in clinical trials
-
Hudson KL, Lauer MS, Collins FS. Toward a new era of trust and transparency in clinical trials. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1353-4.
-
(2016)
JAMA
, vol.316
, Issue.13
, pp. 1353-1354
-
-
Hudson, K.L.1
Lauer, M.S.2
Collins, F.S.3
-
10
-
-
2442692780
-
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles
-
Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2457-65.
-
(2004)
JAMA
, vol.291
, Issue.20
, pp. 2457-2465
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Hróbjartsson, A.2
Haahr, M.T.3
Gøtzsche, P.C.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
11
-
-
47149089516
-
Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet
-
Al-Marzouki S, Roberts I, Evans S, Marshall T. Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet. Lancet. 2008;372(9634):201.
-
(2008)
Lancet
, vol.372
, Issue.9634
, pp. 201
-
-
Al-Marzouki, S.1
Roberts, I.2
Evans, S.3
Marshall, T.4
-
12
-
-
18444370570
-
Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study
-
Pildal J, Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Forfang E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BMJ. 2005;330(7499):1049.
-
(2005)
BMJ
, vol.330
, Issue.7499
, pp. 1049
-
-
Pildal, J.1
Chan, A.W.2
Hróbjartsson, A.3
Forfang, E.4
Altman, D.G.5
Gøtzsche, P.C.6
-
13
-
-
84862807351
-
Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols
-
Mhaskar R, Djulbegovic B, Magazin A, Soares HP, Kumar A. Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(6):602-9.
-
(2012)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.65
, Issue.6
, pp. 602-609
-
-
Mhaskar, R.1
Djulbegovic, B.2
Magazin, A.3
Soares, H.P.4
Kumar, A.5
-
14
-
-
67650886689
-
Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory
-
Hróbjartsson A, Pildal J, Chan AW, Haahr MT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):967-73.
-
(2009)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.62
, Issue.9
, pp. 967-973
-
-
Hróbjartsson, A.1
Pildal, J.2
Chan, A.W.3
Haahr, M.T.4
Altman, D.G.5
Gøtzsche, P.C.6
-
15
-
-
33748446657
-
Adverse event reporting in publications compared with sponsor database for cancer clinical trials
-
Scharf O, Colevas AD. Adverse event reporting in publications compared with sponsor database for cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(24):3933-8.
-
(2006)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.24
, Issue.24
, pp. 3933-3938
-
-
Scharf, O.1
Colevas, A.D.2
-
16
-
-
56749126001
-
Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols
-
Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols. BMJ. 2008;337:a2299. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2299.
-
(2008)
BMJ.
, vol.337
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Hróbjartsson, A.2
Jørgensen, K.J.3
Gøtzsche, P.C.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
17
-
-
79952266571
-
Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials
-
Dwan K, Altman DG, Cresswell L, Blundell M, Gamble CL, Williamson PR. Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1:MR000031.
-
(2011)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
, vol.1
-
-
Dwan, K.1
Altman, D.G.2
Cresswell, L.3
Blundell, M.4
Gamble, C.L.5
Williamson, P.R.6
-
18
-
-
84858998244
-
Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles
-
Blümle A, Meerpohl JJ, Rücker G, Antes G, Schumacher M, von Elm E. Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles. BMJ. 2011;342:d1828.
-
(2011)
BMJ.
, vol.342
-
-
Blümle, A.1
Meerpohl, J.J.2
Rücker, G.3
Antes, G.4
Schumacher, M.5
Elm, E.6
-
19
-
-
84958524810
-
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials
-
Berendt L, Callréus T, Petersen LG, Bach KF, Poulsen HE, Dalhoff K. From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials. Trials. 2016;17:100.
-
(2016)
Trials.
, vol.17
, pp. 100
-
-
Berendt, L.1
Callréus, T.2
Petersen, L.G.3
Bach, K.F.4
Poulsen, H.E.5
Dalhoff, K.6
-
20
-
-
84947290122
-
From protocols to publications: a study in selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials in oncology
-
Raghav KP, Mahajan S, Yao JC, Hobbs BP, Berry DA, Pentz RD, et al. From protocols to publications: a study in selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(31):3583-90.
-
(2015)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.33
, Issue.31
, pp. 3583-3590
-
-
Raghav, K.P.1
Mahajan, S.2
Yao, J.C.3
Hobbs, B.P.4
Berry, D.A.5
Pentz, R.D.6
-
21
-
-
0031036493
-
Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews
-
Horton R. Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews. Lancet. 1997;349(9044):6.
-
(1997)
Lancet
, vol.349
, Issue.9044
, pp. 6
-
-
Horton, R.1
-
22
-
-
0025064575
-
Editorial review of protocols for clinical trials
-
Siegel JP. Editorial review of protocols for clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1990;323(19):1355.
-
(1990)
N Engl J Med
, vol.323
, Issue.19
, pp. 1355
-
-
Siegel, J.P.1
-
23
-
-
0030943952
-
Major journals should peer review trials at protocol stage
-
Foss A, Westcott M. Major journals should peer review trials at protocol stage. BMJ. 1997;314(7095):1691-2.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, Issue.7095
, pp. 1691-1692
-
-
Foss, A.1
Westcott, M.2
-
24
-
-
85010300237
-
-
Accessed 30 Nov 2017 with search criteria ("study protocol"[Title] AND "trial"[Title]) and ("study protocol"[Title] AND "trial"[Title]) AND "Trials"[Journal].
-
PubMed. National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, USA. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. Accessed 30 Nov 2017 with search criteria ("study protocol"[Title] AND "trial"[Title]) and ("study protocol"[Title] AND "trial"[Title]) AND "Trials"[Journal].
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
85010470838
-
-
Accessed 28 Sept 2016.
-
Submission guidelines. https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines. Accessed 28 Sept 2016.
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
84992869870
-
Update on position and design papers
-
Goodman SN. Update on position and design papers. Clin Trials. 2004;1:415-6.
-
(2004)
Clin Trials.
, vol.1
, pp. 415-416
-
-
Goodman, S.N.1
-
27
-
-
77949657394
-
The multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics
-
Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial Research Group. The multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(4):550-61. e10.
-
(2010)
Am J Ophthalmol
, vol.149
, Issue.4
, pp. 550-561
-
-
-
28
-
-
83455213468
-
Challenges in the design and implementation of the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial - lessons for comparative effectiveness trials
-
Holbrook JT, Kempen JH, Prusakowski NA, Altaweel MM, Jabs DA, Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial Research Group. Challenges in the design and implementation of the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial - lessons for comparative effectiveness trials. Clin Trials. 2011;8(6):736-43.
-
(2011)
Clin Trials
, vol.8
, Issue.6
, pp. 736-743
-
-
Holbrook, J.T.1
Kempen, J.H.2
Prusakowski, N.A.3
Altaweel, M.M.4
Jabs, D.A.5
-
29
-
-
84872075614
-
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials
-
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200-7.
-
(2013)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.158
, Issue.3
, pp. 200-207
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Tetzlaff, J.M.2
Altman, D.G.3
Laupacis, A.4
Gøtzsche, P.C.5
Krleža-Jerić, K.6
-
30
-
-
84939133791
-
Coordinating Center Models Project: a study of coordinating centers in multicenter clinical trials IV. Terminology
-
Bethesda: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
-
Coordinating Center Models Project Research Group. Coordinating Center Models Project: a study of coordinating centers in multicenter clinical trials IV. Terminology. Bethesda: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1979. Appendix, p. 9.
-
(1979)
, pp. 9
-
-
-
31
-
-
84872080748
-
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
-
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.
-
(2013)
BMJ.
, vol.346
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Tetzlaff, J.M.2
Gøtzsche, P.C.3
Altman, D.G.4
Mann, H.5
Berlin, J.A.6
-
32
-
-
84876893502
-
ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials E9
-
Step 4 version, dated 5 Feb 1998. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.
-
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials E9. Step 4 version, dated 5 Feb 1998. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E9/Step4/E9_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.
-
-
-
-
33
-
-
85026274323
-
Development of guidance for statistical analysis plans (SAPs) for clinical trials [abstract]
-
Krishan A, Stocken D, Lewis S, Juszczak E, Dore C, Williamson P, et al. Development of guidance for statistical analysis plans (SAPs) for clinical trials [abstract]. Trials. 2015;16 Suppl 2:O41.
-
(2015)
Trials
, vol.16
, pp. O41
-
-
Krishan, A.1
Stocken, D.2
Lewis, S.3
Juszczak, E.4
Dore, C.5
Williamson, P.6
|