The Portuguese plastic carrier bag tax: The effects on consumers’ behavior

Waste Management

Volumn 61, Issue , 2017, Pages 3-12

  Martinho, Graça ^a   Balaia, Natacha ^a   Pires, Ana ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Distance to coast; Marine litter; Market based instrument; Plastic bags; Sustainable behavior

Indexed keywords

PLASTIC CONTAINERS; RETAIL STORES; TAXATION;

DISTANCE TO COASTS; MARINE LITTER; MARKET-BASED INSTRUMENTS; PLASTIC BAGS; SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR;

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR;

PLASTIC;

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL TAX; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MARINE POLLUTION; PLASTIC WASTE; POLLUTION CONTROL; SUPERMARKET; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MARKET; PACKAGING MATERIAL; PLASTIC BAG; PORTUGAL; RECYCLING; TAX; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CITY; ECONOMICS; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

PORTUGAL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CITIES; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PLASTICS; PORTUGAL; PUBLIC OPINION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TAXES; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85010433521     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.023     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. AR (Assembleia da República), 2014. Law no. 82-D/2014 of December 31 (in Portuguese Lei no. 82-D/2014 de 31 de dezembro). Diário da República 252, 6546-(320)-6546-(338).
2. Ayalon, O., Goldrath, T., Rosenthal, G., Grossnam, M., Reduction of plastic carrier bag use: an analysis of alternatives in Israel. Waste Manage. 29 (2009), 2025–2032.
3. Baranzini, A., Carattini, S., Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 19 (2017), 197–227.
4. Batllevell, M., Hanf, K., The fairness of PAYT systems: some guidelines for decisionmakers. Waste Manage. 28 (2008), 2793–2800.
5. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation), Plastic Bag Use Down 71% Since 5p Charge was Introduced. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-politics-34138414, 2015 (accessed 9.12.2016).
6. Bio Intelligence Service, 2011. Assessment of Impacts of Options to Reduce the Use of Single-use Plastic Carrier Bags. Final report prepared for the European Commission – DG Environment.
7. Borrás, S., Edquist, C., The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80 (2013), 1513–1522.
8. Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L., Carrico, A., Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. Am. Psychol. 71 (2016), 199–215.
9. Convery, F., McDonnell, S., Ferreira, S., The Most Popular Tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish Plastic Bags Levy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 38 (2007), 1–11.
10. Dawnay, E., Shah, H., Behavioral economics: seven key principles for environmental policy. Dietz, S., Michie, J., Oughton, C., (eds.) The Political Economy of the Environment – An Interdisciplinary Approach, 2011, Routledge, Oxon, 74–98.
11. DAERA (Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs), Northern Ireland Carrier Bag Levy Statistics. https://www.daera-ni.gov.uk/articles/northern-ireland-carrier-bag-levy-statistics, 2016 (accessed 7.12.2016).
12. Dikgang, J., Leiman, A., Visser, M., Analysis of the plastic-bag levy in South Africa. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 66 (2012), 59–65.
13. EC (European Commission), New Proposals to Reduce Plastic Bag use. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/efe/themes/waste/new-proposals-reduce-plastic-bag-use_en, 2014 (accessed 10.08.2016).
14. EC (European Commission), 2013. Impact assessment accompanying the document proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste to reduce the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags. Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2013) 444 final.
15. EC (European Commission), Communication from the Commission to the Euopean Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee ad the Committee of the Regions – Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2015/EN/1-2015-614-EN-F1-1.PDF, 2015 (accessed 9.12.2016).
16. EC (European Commission), Our Oceans, Seas and Coasts. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/marine/good-environmental-status/descriptor-10/index_en.htm, 2016 (accessed 9.12.2016).
17. EU (European Union), Directive (EU) 2015/720 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 amending Directive 94/62/EC as regards reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union L 115 (2015), 11–15.
18. Eunomia, 2012. Assistance to the Commission to the Complement an Assessment of the Socioeconomic Costs and Benefits of Options to Reduce the use of Single-Use Plastic Carrier Bags in the EU. Final report for the European Commission DG Environment under Framework Contract No. ENV.C.2/FRA/2011/0020.
19. Eurostat, Environmental taxes. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/environment/environmental-taxes, 2016 (accessed 9.12.2016).
20. Garcia, R., 2015. Green Tax Increases Consumption of Garbage Bags by 40% (in Portuguese: Fiscalidade verde aumenta consumo de sacos de lixo em 40%) < https://www.publico.pt/economia/noticia/fiscalidade-verde-aumenta-consumo-de-sacos-de-lixo-em-40-1710804> (accessed 10.08.2016).
21. He, H., 2010. The Effects of an Environmental Policy on Consumers: Lessons from the Chinese Plastic Bag Regulation. Working Papers in Economics, no. 453. School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
22. Hermann, B., Carus, M., Pael, M., Blok, K., Current policies affecting the market penetration of biomaterials. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 5 (2011), 708–719.
23. Howell, D., 2016. The 5p Plastic Bag Charge: All You Need to Know < http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34346309> (accessed 10.08.2016).
24. IBM Corp., 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY.
25. Jakovcevic, A., Steg, L., Mazzeo, N., Caballero, R., Franco, P., Putrino, N., Favara, J., Charges for plastic bags: motivational and behavioral effects. J. Environ. Psychol. 40 (2014), 372–380.
26. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (1979), 263–291.
27. Kasidoni, M., Moutakas, K., Malamis, D., The existing situation and challenges regarding the use of plastic carrier bags in Europe. Waste Manage. Res. 33 (2015), 419–428.
28. Kraska-Miller, M., Nonparametric Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
29. Luís, I.P., Spínola, H., The influence of a voluntary fee in the consumption of plastic bags on supermarkets from Madeira Island (Portugal). J. Environ Plan. Manage. 53 (2010), 883–889.
30. Martinho, G., Pires, A., Portela, G., Fonseca, M., Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 103 (2015), 58–68.
31. Muralidharan, S., Sheehan, K., “Tax” and “Fee” message frames inhibitors of plastic bag usage among shoppers: a social marketing application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Soc. Mark. Quart. 22 (2016), 200–217.
32. Nellor, D.C.L., Environmental taxes. Shome, P., (eds.) Tax Policy Handbook, 1995, Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund, Washigton, D.C., 108–116.
33. Newman, S., Watkins, E., Farmer, A., ten Brink, P., Schweitzer, J.-P., The economics of marine litter. Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M., (eds.) Marine Anthropogenic Litter, 2015, Springer, Berlin, 367–394.
34. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), Environmentally Related Taxes in OECD Countries: Issues and Strategies. 2001, OECD, Paris.
35. Pires, A., Martinho, G., Ribeiro, R., Mota, M., Teixeira, L., Extended producer responsibility: a differential fee model for promoting sustainable packaging. J. Clean. Prod. 108 (2015), 343–353.
36. Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., Suffolk, C., The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: attitude change and behavior spillover effect. J. Environ. Psychol. 36 (2013), 240–247.
37. Potts, T., Pita, C., O'Higgins, T., Mee, L., Who cares? European attitudes towards marine and coastal environments. Marine Policy 72 (2016), 59–66.
38. Pre-waste, Eco-tax on plastic bags in Romania (Pre-waste factsheet 94). http://www.prewaste.eu/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=249&Itemid=94, 2011 (accessed 9.12.2016).
39. Sharp, A., Høj, S., Wheeler, M., Proscription and its impact on anticonsumption behaviour and attitudes: the case of plastic bags. J. Consum. Behav. 9 (2010), 470–484.
40. Sheavly, S.B., Register, K.M., Marine debris & plastics: environmental concerns, sources, impacts and solutions. J. Polym. Environ. 15 (2007), 301–305.
41. Silva, A.R., 2015a. Industry reduces personal and cannot compensate for losses caused by environmental tax (in Portuguese: Indústria reduz pessoal e não consegue compensar as perdas provocadas pela taxa ambiental). https://www.publico.pt/economia/noticia/industria-reduz-trabalhadores-e-nao-consegue-compensar-as-perdas-provocadas-pela-taxa-ambiental-1710669 (accessed 10.08.2016).
42. Silva, A.R., 2015b. Big retailers create new market with the new plastic bags law (in Portuguese: Híperes fazem negócio com nova lei dos sacos de plástico). https://www.publico.pt/2015/02/14/economia/noticia/hipers-fazem-negocio-com-sacos-de-plastico-que-nao-estao-sujeitos-a-taxa-1686063 (accessed 03.01.2017).
43. Steg, L., Vlek, C., Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 29 (2009), 309–317.
44. ten Brink, P., Schweitzer, J.-P., Watkins, E., Howe, M., 2016. Plastics marine litter and the Circular Economy. A briefing by IEEP for the MAVA Foundation.
45. Tiago, L., 2016. Plastic bag tax predicted 40 million. Only gave 1.5 million (in Portuguese: Taxa dos sacos de plástico previa 40 milhões. Só deu 1,5 milhões) https://www.dinheirovivo.pt/economia/taxa-dos-sacos-de-plastico-previa-40-milhoes-so-deu-15-milhoes/ (accessed 10.08.2016).
46. The Danish Ecological Council, Fact sheet: Tax on plastic bags. http://www.ecocouncil.dk/en/documents/temasider/1776-150812-tax-on-plastic-bags, 2015 (accessed 9.12.2016).
47. The Guardian, Scotland's plastic bag usage down 80% since 5p charge introduced. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/apr/17/scotland-plastic-bag-usage-falls-after-5p-charge-introduced, 2015 (accessed 9.12.2016).
48. The Guardian, England's plastic bag usage drops 85% since 5p charge introduced. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jul/30/england-plastic-bag-usage-drops-85-per-cent-since-5p-charged-introduced, 2016 (accessed 9.12.2016).
49. Thompson, R.C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R.P., Davis, A., Rowland, S.J., John, A.W.G., McGonigle, D., Russell, A.E., Lost at sea: where is all the plastic?. Science, 304, 2004, 838.
50. Tonglet, M., Phillips, P.S., Bates, M.P., Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behaviour: waste minimisation compared to recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 42 (2004), 27–48.
51. Valorlux, PPP-Initiative “Eco-Bag”. http://valorlux.lu/sites/valorlux/files/files/VALLO01-4009_FactSheet_GB-4Web.pdf, 2014 (accessed 9.12.2016).
52. Wagner, T.P., Broaddus, N., The generation and cost of litter resulting from the curbside collection of recycling. Waste Manage. 50 (2016), 3–9.
53. Watkins, E., Hogg, D., Mitsios, A., Mudgal, S., Neubauer, A., Reisinger, H., Troeltzsch, J., van Acoleyen, M., 2012. Use of Economic Instruments and Waste Management Performances e Final Report. Report for the European Commission (DG ENV).
54. Wright, S.L., Thompson, R.C., Galloway, T.S., The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: a review. Environ. Pollut. 178 (2013), 483–492.