On the Meaningfulness of “Big Data Quality” (Invited Paper)

Data Science and Engineering

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 6-20

  Firmani, Donatella ^a   Mecella, Massimo ^b   Scannapieco, Monica ^c   Batini, Carlo ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c ITALIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Big data; Data quality; Information quality; Quality dimensions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010343594     PISSN: 23641185     EISSN: 23641541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s41019-015-0004-7     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Batini C, Scannapieco M (2015) Data and information quality. Dimensions, principles and techniques. Springer, New York
2. Batini C, Palmonari M, Viscusi G (2012) The many faces of information and their impact on information quality. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on information quality (IQ 2012)
3. Bergman MK (2001) The deep web: surfacing hidden value. J Electron Publ 7:1407
4. Bizer C (2007) Quality-driven information filtering in the context of Web-based information systems, PhD thesis. Freie Universität Berlin, March 2007
5. Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data—the story so far. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 5(3):1–22
6. Carroll JJ (2003) Signing rdf graphs. Technical report, HPL-2003-142, HP Labs
7. Chall JS (1995) Readability revisited. The new Dale-Chall readability formula, vol 118. Brookline Books, Cambridge
8. Cohen W, Ravikumar P, Fienberg S (2003) A comparison of string metrics for matching names and records. KDD Workshop Data Clean Object Consol 3:73–78
9. Crosby PB (1979) Quality is free. McGraw-Hill, New York
10. Dalvi N, Machanavajjhala A, Pang B (2012) An analysis of structured data on the web. Proc VLDB Endow 5(7):680–691
11. de Ridder H, Endrikhovski S (2002) Image quality is fun: reflections on fidelity, usefulness and naturalness. SID Symp Dig Tech Pap 33:986–989
12. Dong XL, Saha B, Srivastava D (2013) Less is more: selecting sources wisely for integration. In: Proceedings of the 39th international conference on very large data bases, PVLDB’13. VLDB Endowment, pp 37–48
13. DuBay WH (2004) The principles of readability. http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf
14. Elmagarmid AK, Ipeirotis PG, Verykios VS (2007) Duplicate record detection: a survey. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19(1):1–16
15. Fan W, Geerts F (2012) Foundations of data quality management. Synthesis lectures on data management. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael
16. Farr JN, Jenkins JJ, Paterson DG (1951) Simplification of flesch reading ease formula. J Appl Psychol 35(5):333
17. Fellegi IP, Holt D (1976) A systematic approach to automatic edit and imputation. J Am Stat Assoc 71(353):17–35
18. Flemming A (2011) Qualitätsmerkmale von Linked Data-veröffentlichenden Datenquellen. Diplomarbeit (Quality Criteria for Linked Data Sources) https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~ohartig/files/DiplomarbeitAnnikaFlemming.pdf
19. Flesch R (1948) A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 32(3):221
20. Fürber C, Hepp M (2011) Swiqa—a semantic web information quality assessment framework. In: Proceedings of the ECIS
21. Gal A (2015) Big data integration. In: Keynote speech at international conference on open and big data (OBD 2015), August 2015, IEEE CS Press
22. Gil Y, Artz D (2007) Towards content trust of web resources. Web Semant 5(4):227–239
23. Gonzales RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
24. Gunning R (1952) The technique of clear writing. McGraw Hill International Book, New York
25. He B, Patel M, Zhang Z, Chang K (2007) Accessing the deep web. Commun ACM 50(5):94–101
26. Hogan A, Umbrich J, Harth A, Cyganiak R, Polleres A, Decker S (2012) An empirical survey of linked data conformance. J Web Semant 14:14–44
27. Hua W, Wang Z, Wang H, Zheng K, Zhou X (2015) Short text understanding through lexical-semantic analysis. In: Poster at ICDE 2015
28. Ipeirotis PG, Gravano L (2002) Distributed search over the hidden web: hierarchical database sampling and selection. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on very large data bases. VLDB Endowment, pp 394–405
29. International Organization for Standardization - ISO. Quality management and quality assurance. Vocabulary. ISO 84021994
30. Jacobi I, Kagal L, Khandelwal A (2011) Rule-based trust assessment on the semantic web. In: International conference on Rule-based reasoning, programming, and applications series, pp 227–241
31. Juran JM (1988) Juran on planning for quality. The Free Press, New York
32. Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BS (1975) Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Technical report, DTIC Document
33. Kitson HD (1921) The mind of the buyer: a psychology of selling, vol 21549. Macmillan, New York
34. Klare GR (1974) Assessing readability. Read Res Q 10:62–102
35. Lei Y, Uren V, Motta E (2007) A framework for evaluating semantic metadata. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on knowledge capture, ACM
36. Li Q, Li Y, Gao J, Zhao B, Fan W, Han J (2014) Resolving conflicts in heterogeneous data by truth discovery and source reliability estimation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
37. Li X, Dong XL, Lyons K, Meng W, Srivastava D (2012) Truth finding on the deep web: is the problem solved? Proc VLDB Endow 6(2):97–108
38. Manzoor A, Truong HL, Dustdar S (2008) On the evaluation of quality of context. In: Smart sensing and context. Springer
39. Mendes P, Mühleisen H, Bizer C (2012) Sieve: linked data quality assessment and fusion. In: Proceedings of the 2012 joint EDBT/ICDT workshops
40. NASSCOM (2012) Big data—the next big thing. Technical report, NASSCOM (2012)
41. Payne RS, McVay S (1971) Songs of humpback whales. Science 173:585–597
42. Pernici B, Scannapieco M (2003) Data quality in web information systems. J Data Semant 1:48–68
43. Pipino LL, Lee YW, Wang RY (2002) Data quality assessment. Commun ACM 45(4):211–218
44. Raghavan S, Garcia-Molina H (2001) Crawling the hidden web. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on very large data bases
45. Rekatsinas T, Dong XL, Srivastava D (2014) Characterizing and selecting fresh data sources. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data
46. Senter RJ, Smith EA (1967) Automated readability index. Technical report, DTIC Document
47. Sha K, Shi W (2008) Consistency-driven data quality management of networked sensor systems. J Parallel Distrib Comput 68(9):1207–1221
48. Stankovic JA (2014) Research directions for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J 1:3–9
49. UNECE. Classification of types of big data. http://www1.unece.org/stat/platform/display/bigdata/Classification+of+Types+of+Big+Data. Accessed Aug 2015
50. W3C. http://www.w3.org/WAI/. Accessed Aug 2015
51. Wang RY, Strong DM (1996) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J Manag Inf Syst 12(4):5–34
52. Wayne SR (1983) Quality control circle and company wide quality control. Qual Prog 16(10):14–17
53. Wu FJ, Kao YF, Tseng YC (2011) From wireless sensor networks towards cyber physical systems. Pervasive Mobile Comput 7(4):397–413
54. Wu W, Yu C, Doan A, Meng W (2004) An interactive clustering-based approach to integrating source query interfaces on the deep web. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data
55. Zakaluk BL, Samuels SJ (eds) (1988) Readability: its past, present, and future. International Reading Association, Newark