Erratum: An inter-comparison study of multi-and DBS lidar measurements in Complex Terrain [Remote Sens, 8, 782, (2016)] DOI: 10.3390/rs8090782;An inter-comparison study of multi- and DBS lidar measurements in complex terrain

Remote Sensing

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2016, Pages

  Pauscher, Lukas ^a,b   Vasiljevic, Nikola ^c   Callies, Doron ^a   Lea, Guillaume ^c   Mann, Jakob ^c   Klaas, Tobias ^a,d   Hieronimus, Julian ^e   Gottschall, Julia ^a   Schwesig, Annedore ^a   Kühn, Martin ^e   Courtney, Michael ^c  

^a FRAUNHOFER IWES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Complex terrain; Multi lidar; Turbulence; Wind energy; WindScanner

Indexed keywords

LANDFORMS; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS; TURBULENCE; WIND; WIND EFFECTS; WIND POWER;

COMPLEX TERRAINS; DIRECTIONAL ERRORS; ENERGY APPLICATIONS; LIDAR MEASUREMENTS; MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN; SECOND ORDER STATISTICS; TURBULENCE MEASUREMENTS; WINDSCANNER;

OPTICAL RADAR;

EID: 85010333202     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs9070667     Document Type: Erratum

References (46)

1. Gottschall, J.; Courtney, M.S.; Wagner, R.; Jørgensen, H.E.; Antoniou, I. Lidar profilers in the context of wind energy-A verification procedure for traceable measurements. Wind Energy 2012, 15, 147-159.
2. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61400-12 Wind Turbines-Part 12-1: Power Performance Measurements of Electricity Producing Wind Turbines (2nd Committee Draft), 2nd ed.; International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
3. Fördergesellschaft Windenergie und andere Erneuerbare Energien e.V. (FGW). TR6 Bestimmung von Windpotenzial und Energieerträgen. Available online: http://www.wind-fgw.de/TR.html (accessed on 20 September 2016).
4. Bingöl, F.; Mann, J.; Foussekis, D. Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain. Meteorol. Z. 2009, 18, 189-195. [rossRef]
5. Bradley, S.; Strehz, A.; Emeis, S. Remote sensing winds in complex terrain-A review. Meteorol. Z. 2015, 24, 547-555.
6. Klaas, T.; Pauscher, L.; Callies, D. Lidar-mast deviations in complex terrain and their simulation using CFD. Meteorol. Z. 2015, 24, 591-603.
7. Sathe, A.; Mann, J. A review of turbulence measurements using ground-based wind lidars. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2013, 6, 3147-3167.
8. Sathe, A.; Banta, R.; Pauscher, L.; Vogstad, K.; Schlipf, D.; Wylie, S. Estimating Turbulence Statistics and Parameters from Ground- and Nacelle-Based Lidar Measurements; IEA Wind Expert Report; DTUWind Energy: Roskilde, Denmark, 2015.
9. Sathe, A.; Mann, J.; Gottschall, J.; Courtney, M.S. Can wind lidars measure turbulence? J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2011, 28, 853-868.
10. Sathe, A.; Mann, J. Measurement of turbulence spectra using scanning pulsed wind lidars. J. Geophys. Res. 2012, 117.
11. Newman, J.F.; Klein, P.M.; Wharton, S.; Sathe, A.; Bonin, T.A.; Chilson, P.B.; Muschinski, A. Evaluation of three lidar scanning strategies for turbulence measurements. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2016, 9, 1993-2013.
12. Sathe, A.; Mann, J.; Vasiljevic, N.; Lea, G. A six-beam method to measure turbulence statistics using ground-based wind lidars. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 729-740.
13. Eberhard,W.L.; Cupp, R.E.; Healy, K.R. Doppler lidar measurement of profiles of turbulence and momentum flux. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 1989, 6, 809-819. 14. Mann, J.; Cariou, J.-P.; Courtney, M.S.; Parmentier, R.; Mikkelsen, T.;Wagner, R.; Lindelöw, P.; Sjöholm, M.; Enevoldsen, K. Comparison of 3D turbulence measurements using three staring wind lidars and a sonic anemometer. Meteorol. Z. 2009, 18, 135-140.
14. Mann, J.; Cariou, J.-P.; Courtney, M.S.; Parmentier, R.; Mikkelsen, T.;Wagner, R.; Lindelöw, P.; Sjöholm, M.; Enevoldsen, K. Comparison of 3D turbulence measurements using three staring wind lidars and a sonic anemometer. Meteorol. Z. 2009, 18, 135-140.
15. Vasiljevic, N. A Time-Space Synchronization of Coherent Doppler Scanning Lidars for 3D Measurements of Wind Fields. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark, 2014.
16. Fuertes, F.C.; Iungo, G.V.; Porté-Agel, F. 3D turbulence measurements using three synchronous wind lidars: Validation against Sonic Anemometry. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2014, 31, 1549-1556.
17. Berg, J.; Vasiljevíc, N.; Kelly, M.; Lea, G.; Courtney, M. Addressing spatial variability of surface-layer wind with long-range WindScanners. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2015, 32, 518-527.
18. Mann, J. The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 1994, 273, 141-168.
19. Newman, J.F.; Bonin, T.A.; Klein, P.M.; Wharton, S.; Newsom, R.K. Testing and validation of multi-lidar scanning strategies for wind energy applications. Wind Energy 2016.
20. Mann, J.; Angelou, N.; Arnqvist, J.; Callies, D.; Cantero, E.; Chávez Arroyo, R.; Courtney, M.; Cuxart, J.; Dellwik, E.; Gottschall, J.; et al. Complex terrain experiments in the New European Wind Atlas. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2016, in review.
21. Tatarskii, V.I.; Muschinski, A. The difference between Doppler velocity and real wind velocity in single scattering from refractive index fluctuations. Radio Sci. 2001, 36, 1405-1423.
22. Huffaker, R.M.; Hardesty, R.M. Remote sensing of atmospheric wind velocities using solid-state and CO2 coherent laser systems. Proc. IEEE 1996, 84, 181-204.
23. Frehlich, R. Effects of wind turbulence on coherent Doppler lidar performance. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 1997, 14, 54-75.
24. Lindelöw, P.J.P.; Mohr, J.J.; Peucheret, C.; Feuchter, T.; Christensen, E.L. Fiber Based Coherent Lidars for Remote Wind Sensing; Technical University of Denmark, DTU: Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, 2008.
25. Banakh, V.A.; Smalikho, I.N. Estimation of the turbulence energy dissipation rate from the pulsed Doppler lidar data. Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 1997, 10, 957-965.
26. Kaimal, J.C.; Wyngaard, J.C.; Haugen, D.A. Deriving power spectra from a three-component sonic anemometer. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1968, 7, 827-837.
27. Cariou, J.-P.; Leopshere, Paris, France. Personal communication, 2016.
28. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61400-1 Wind Turbines-Part 1: Design Requirements; International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
29. Veers, P.S. Three-Dimensional Wind Simulation; Sandia National Laboratories: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1988.
30. Mann, J.Wind field simulation. Probab. Eng. Mech. 1998, 13, 269-282.
31. Farr, T.G.; Rosen, P.A.; Caro, E.; Crippen, R.; Duren, R.; Hensley, S.; Kobrick, M.; Paller, M.; Rodriguez, E.; Roth, L.; et al. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys. 2007, 45.
32. Vasiljevic, N.; Lea, G.; Hansen, P.; Jensen, H.M. Mobile Network Architecture of the Long-Range WindScanner System; DTUWind Energy: Roskilde, Denmark, 2016.
33. Kaimal, J.C.; Finnigan, J.J. Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994.
34. Foken, T.; Leuning, R.; Oncley, S.R.; Mauder, M.; Aubinet, M. Corrections and data quality control. In Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis; Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., Papale, D., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 85-131.
35. Mauder, M.; Oncley, S.P.; Vogt, R.; Weidinger, T.; Ribeiro, L.; Bernhofer, C.; Foken, T.; Kohsiek, W.; de Bruin, H.; Liu, H. The energy balance experiment EBEX-2000. Part II: Intercomparison of eddy-covariance sensors and post-field data processing methods. Bound. Lay Meteorol. 2007, 123, 29-54.
36. Angelou, N.; Mann, J.; Sjöholm, M.; Courtney, M. Direct measurement of the spectral transfer function of a laser based anemometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2012, 83, 033111.
37. Sjöholm, M.; Mikkelsen, T.; Mann, J.; Enevoldsen, K.; Courtney, M. Spatial averaging-effects on turbulence measured by a continuous-wave coherent lidar. Meteorol. Z. 2009, 18, 281-287.
38. Stawiarski, C.; Träumner, K.; Knigge, C.; Calhoun, R. Scopes and challenges of dual-Doppler lidar wind measurements - an error analysis. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2013, 30, 2044-2062.
39. Bradley, S.; Perrott, Y.; Behrens, P.; Oldroyd, A. Corrections for wind-speed errors from sodar and lidar in complex terrain. Bound. Lay. Meteorol. 2012, 143, 37-48.
40. Newsom, R.K.; Berg, L.K.; Shaw, W.J.; Fischer, M.L. Turbine-scale wind field measurements using dual-Doppler lidar. Wind Energy 2015, 18, 219-235.
41. Canadillas, B.; Bégué, A.; Neumann, T. Comparison of turbulence spectra derived from Lidar and sonic measurements at the offshore platform FINO1. In Proceedings of the 10th German Wind Energy Conference (DEWEK 2010), Bremen, Germany, 17-18 November 2010.
42. Moore, C.J. Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems. Bound. Lay. Meteorol. 1986, 37, 17-35.
43. Hogan, R.J.; Grant, A.L.M.; Illingworth, A.J.; Pearson, G.N.; O'Connor, E.J. Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud-topped boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2009, 135, 635-643.
44. Barlow, J.F.; Halios, C.H.; Lane, S.E.;Wood, C.R. Observations of urban boundary layer structure during a strong urban heat island event. Environ. Fluid Mech. 2015, 15, 373-398.
45. Smalikho, I.; Köpp, F.; Rahm, S. Measurement of atmospheric turbulence by 2-μm Doppler lidar. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2005, 22, 1733-1747.
46. Mann, J.; Peña, A.; Bingöl, F.; Wagner, R.; Courtney, M.S. Lidar scanning of momentum flux in and above the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2010, 27, 959-976.