Informing Strategic Efforts to Expand and Connect Protected Areas Using a Model of Ecological Flow, with Application to the Western United States

Conservation Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 564-571

  Dickson, Brett G ^a,b   Albano, Christine M ^a,c   McRae, Brad H ^d   Anderson, Jesse J ^a   Theobald, David M ^a   Zachmann, Luke J ^a,b   Sisk, Thomas D ^b   Dombeck, Michael P ^e  

^a Conservation Science Partners Inc ^*  (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

Author keywords

Bureau of Land Management; Centrality; connectivity; conservation planning; ecological flow; effective resistance; protected areas

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010214396     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1755263X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12322     Document Type: Letter

References (39)

1. Beckmann, J.P., Murray, K., Seidler, R.G. & Berger, J. (2012). Human-mediated shifts in animal habitat use: sequential changes in pronghorn use of a natural gas field in Greater Yellowstone. Biol. Conserv., 147, 222-233.
2. Berger, J., Cain, S.L., Cheng, E. et al. (2014). Optimism and challenge for science-based conservation of migratory species in and out of U.S. national parks. Conserv. Biol., 28, 4-12.
3. Breckheimer, I., Haddad, N.M., Morris, W.F. et al. (2014). Defining and evaluating the umbrella species concept for conserving and restoring landscape connectivity. Conserv. Biol., 28, 1584-1593.
4. Brudvig, L., Damschen, E., Tewksbury, J., Haddad, N.M. & Levey, D. (2009). Landscape connectivity promotes plant biodiversity spillover into non-target habitats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106, 9328-9332.
5. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (2008). Pinedale Resource Management Plan [WWW Document]. http://www.blm.gov/wy/st/en/programs/Planning/rmps/pinedale/rod_armp.html. Accessed 13 May 2016.
6. Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164-1168.
7. Clement, J., Belin, A., Bean, M., Boling, T. & Lyons, J. (2014). A strategy for improving the mitigation policies and practices of the department of the interior. A report to the Secretary of the Interior from the Energy and Climate Change Task Force, Washington, D.C.
8. Collins, G.H. (2016). Seasonal distribution and routes of pronghorn in the northern Great Basin. West. North Am. Nat., 76, 101-112.
9. Cumming, G., Allen, C., Ban, N. et al. (2015). Understanding protected area resilience: a multi-scale, social-ecological approach. Ecol. Appl., 25, 299-319.
10. Dawson, T.P., Jackson, S.T., House, J.I., Prentice, I.C. & Mace, G.M. (2011). Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science, 332, 53-58.
11. Defries, R., Hansen, A.J., Turner, B., Redi, R. & Liu, J. (2007). Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecol. Appl., 17, 1031-1038.
12. Dickson, B.G., Zachmann, L.J. & Albano, C.M. (2014). Systematic identification of potential conservation priority areas on roadless Bureau of Land Management lands in the western United States. Biol. Conserv., 178, 117-127.
13. Foley, M.M., Halpern, B.S., Micheli, F. et al. (2010). Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Mar. Pol., 34, 955-966.
14. Goetz, S.J., Jantz, P. & Jantz, C.A. (2009). Connectivity of core habitat in the Northeastern United States: parks and protected areas in a landscape context. Rem. Sens. Environ., 113, 1421–1429.
15. Hansen, A.J. & Defries, R. (2007). Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecol. Appl., 17, 974-988.
16. Jones, N.F., Pejchar, L. & Kiesecker, J.M. (2015). The energy footprint: how oil, natural gas, and wind energy affect land for biodiversity and the flow of ecosystem services. Bioscience, 65, 290-301.
17. Knick, S.T., Hanser, S.E. & Preston, K.L. (2013). Modeling ecological minimum requirements for distribution of greater sage-grouse leks: implications for population connectivity across their western range, U.S.A. Ecol. Evol., 3, 1539-1551.
18. Krosby, M., Breckheimer, I., Pierce, J. et al. (2015). Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning. Landsc. Ecol., 30, 2121-2132.
19. Krosby, M., Tewksbury, J., Haddad, N.M. & Hoekstra, J. (2010). Ecological connectivity for a changing climate. Conserv. Biol., 24, 1686-1689.
20. Lendrum, P.E., Anderson Jr, C.R., Monteith, K.L., Jenks, J.A. & Bowyer, R.T. (2013). Migrating mule deer: effects of anthropogenically altered landscapes. PLoS One, 8, e64548.
21. Margules, C.R. & Pressey, R.L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405, 243-253.
22. McClure, M.L., Hansen, A.J. & Inman, R.M. (2016). Connecting models to movements: testing connectivity model predictions against empirical migration and dispersal data. Landsc. Ecol., 31, 1419–1432.
23. McRae, B., Shah, V. & Mohapatra, T. (2013). Circuitscape 4 User Guide.
24. McRae, B.H. & Beier, P. (2007). Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States Am., 104, 19885-19890.
25. McRae, B.H., Dickson, B.G., Keitt, T. & Shah, V. (2008). Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 89, 2712-2724.
26. National Fish, Wildlife, and Plants Climate Adaptation Partnership. (2012). National fish, wildlife and plants climate adaptation strategy. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Council on Environmental Quality, Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
27. Newman, M. (2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc. Networks, 27, 39-54.
28. Northrup, J.M. & Wittemyer, G. (2013). Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. Ecol. Lett., 16, 112-125.
29. Olds, A.D., Connolly, R.M., Pitt, K.A. & Maxwell, P.S. (2012). Habitat connectivity improves reserve performance. Conserv. Lett., 5, 56-63.
30. Pressey, R.L. (1994). Ad hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems? Conserv. Biol., 8, 662-668.
31. Sawyer, H., Kauffman, M.J., Middleton, A.D., Morrison, T.A., Nielson, M. & Wyckoff, T.B. (2012). A framework for understanding semi-permeable barrier effects on migratory ungulates. J. Appl. Ecol., 50, 68-78.
32. Seidler, R.G., Long, R.A., Berger, J., Bergen, S. & Beckmann, J.P. (2014). Identifying impediments to long-distance mammal migrations. Conserv. Biol., 29, 99-109.
33. Theobald, D.M. (2013). A general model to quantify ecological integrity for landscape assessments and US application. Landsc. Ecol., 28, 1859-1874.
34. Theobald, D.M., Reed, S.E., Fields, K. & Soulé, M. (2012). Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conserv. Lett., 5, 123-133.
35. Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B. et al. (2001). Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science, 292, 281-284.
36. U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) (2011). Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2011-2016. [WWW Document]. https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/migrated/bpp/upload/DOI_FY2011-FY2016_StrategicPlan.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2015.
37. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2008). National Hydrography Dataset [WWW Document]. http://nhd.usgs.gov/. Accessed 1 June 2014.
38. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (2012). Protected Areas Database of the United States (PADUS) version 1.3 [WWW Document]. http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/PADUS. Accessed 10 June 2015.
39. Watson, J., Darling, E., Venter, O. et al. (2016). Bolder science needed now for protected areas. Conserv. Biol., 30, 243-248.