Potential property. Intellectual rights and property in persons

Social Anthropology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 17-32

  Strathern, Marilyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010186111     PISSN: 09640282     EISSN: 14698676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.1996.tb00311.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barraud, C., De Coppet, D., Iteanu, A. and Jamous, R. 1994. Of relations and the dead: four societies viewed from the angle of their exchanges (translated by S. Suffern). Oxford: Berg.
2. Born, G. 1995. Rationalizing culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the institutionalization of the musical avant-garde. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
3. Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo academicus (translated by P. Collier). Oxford: Polity Press.
4. Brennan, T. 1993. History after Lacan. London: Routledge.
5. Brush, S. B. 1993. ‘Indigenous knowledge of biological resources and intellectual property rights: the role of anthropology’, American Anthropologist, 95: 653-86.
6. Brush, S. B. 1994. ‘A non-market approach to protecting biological resources’, in T. C. Greaves, (ed), Intellectual property rights for indigenous peoples: a sourcebook.
7. Campbell, C. 1992. ‘The desire for the new: its nature and social location as presented in theories of fashion and modern consumerism’, in R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch, (eds), Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge.
8. Coombe, R. J. 1993. ‘Tactics of appropriation and the politics of recognition in late modern democracies’, Political Theory, 21: 411-33.
9. Coombe, R. J. 1994. ‘Challenging paternity: histories of copyright’ [Review article], Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 6: 397-422.
10. Cussins, C., in press. ‘Ontological choregraphy. Agency for women patients in an infertility clinic’, in M. Berg and A. Mol, (eds), Differences in medicine: unraveling practices, techniques and bodies.
11. Dolgin, J. 1994. ‘The “intent” of reproduction: reproductive technology and the parent-child bond’, University of Connecticut Law Review, 26: 1261-314.
12. Escobar, A. 1994. ‘Welcome to cyberia: notes on the anthropology of cyberculture’, Current Anthropology, 35: 211-31.
13. European Federation of Biotechnology (Task group on public perceptions of biotechnology). 1993. Patenting life, Briefing paper 1, London.
14. European Parliament. 1995. The Week (1 March 1995) [in English].
15. Foster, R. J. 1990. ‘Nurture and force-feeding: mortuary feasting and the construction of collective individuals in a New Ireland society’, American Ethnologist, 17: 431-48.
16. Foster, R. J. 1995. Social reproduction and history in Melanesia. Mortuary ritual, gift exchange and custom in the Tanga Islands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Franklin, S. 1993. ‘Making represcntations: the parliamentary debate on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act’, in J. Edwards et al., Technologies of procreation: kinship in the age of assisted reproduction. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18. Franklin, S. 1995. ‘Science of culture, cultures of science’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24.
19. Gibbons, M. et al. 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
20. Greaves, T. C. 1995. ‘Cultural rights and ethnography’, Bulletin of the General Anthropology Division (American Anthropological Association), 1(2): 1-6.
21. Greaves, T. C., (ed). 1994. Intellectual property rights for indigenous peoples: a sourcebook. Oklahoma City: Society for Applied Anthropology.
22. Handler, R. 1988. Nationalism and the politics of culture in Quebec. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
23. Harrison, S. 1992. Ritual as intellectual property, Man (NS), 27: 225-44.
24. Harvey, D. 1990. The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origin of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Harvey, P., in press. Hybrids of modernity: anthropology, the nation state and the universal exhibition. London: Routledge.
26. Hill, S. and Turpin, T. 1995, ‘The new localism’, in M. Strathern (ed.). Shifting contexts. Transformations in anthropological knowledge. London: Routledge.
27. Law, John. 1994. Organizing modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Marcus, G. 1994. ‘Ethnography in/of the world system: the mergence of multi-sited ethnography’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 23.
29. Morgan, D. 1994. ‘A surrogacy issue: Who is the other mother? International Journal of Law and Family, 8: 386-412.
30. Nielson, L. 1993. ‘The right to a child versus the rights of a child’, in J. Eekelaar and P. Sarcevic, (eds), Parenthood in modern society: Legal and social issues. for the twenty-first century. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
31. National Academies Policy Advisory Group. 1995. Intellectual property and the academic community. London: NAPAG/Royal Society.
32. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 1995. Human tissue: ethical and legal issues. London: Nuffield Foundation.
33. Oyama, S. 1985. The ontogeny of information: developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Patent Concern N. D. Patenting of plants and animals. London: The Genetics Forum.
35. Patent Office N. D. (1995 printing). What is intellectual property? Newport: Department of Trade and Industry.
36. Posey, D. 1990. ‘Intellectual property rights and just compensation for indigenous knowledge’, Anthropology Today, 6(4): 13-16.
37. Posey, D. 1994. ‘International agreements and intellectual property right protection for indigenous peoples’, in T. C. Greaves, (ed), Intellectual property rights for indigenous peoples: a sourcebook.
38. Schwimmer, E. 1979. ‘The self and the product: concepts of work in comparative perspective’, in S. Wallman (ed.), Social anthropology of work. London: Academic Press.
39. Singleton, V. and Michael, M. 1993. ‘Actor-networks and ambivalence: general practitioners in the UK cervical screening programme’, Social Studies of Science, 23: 227-64.
40. Soleri, D. and Cleveland, D. and D. Eriacho and F. Bowannie Jun, A. Laahty and Zuni Community Members. 1994. ‘Gifts from the creator: intellectual property rights and folk crop varieties’, in T. C. Greaves, (ed), Intellectual property rights for indigenous peoples: a sourcebook.
41. Stephenson, D. J. 1994. ‘A legal paradigm for protecting traditional knowledge’, in T. C. Greaves, (ed), Intellectual property rights for indigenous peoples: a sourcebook.
42. Strathern, M. 1992. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Strathern, M. 1995. The relation: issues in complexity and scale. Cambridge: Prickly Pear Pamphlet no. 6 Forthcoming. ‘The new modernities’, in J. Wassmann and V. Keck, (eds), Common worlds and single lives: constituting knowledge in Pacific societies.
44. Suagee, D. B. 1994. ‘Human rights and cultural heritage: developments in the United Nations working group on indigenous populations’, in T. C. Greaves, (ed), Intellectual property rights for indigenous peoples: a sourcebook.