International relations: Divided by a common language?

Government and Opposition

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 271-279

  Clark, Ian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010165196     PISSN: 0017257X     EISSN: 14777053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1477-7053.00098     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. E. H. Carr, What is History?, London, Penguin Books, 2nd edn, 1990, p. 66.
2. C. Hill, ‘History and International Relations’, in S. Smith (ed.), International Relations: British and American Perspectives, Oxford, Blackwell, 1985, p. 130.
3. International Relations: British and American Perspectivesw, p. 133.
4. This finding is not really supported by the more recent survey of IR by Steve Smith in which he sees a continuing differentiation between US and British IR on the basis of the latter's greater historical sensitivity. See S. Smith, ‘The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2:3 (October 2000), p. 398.
5. 22:1 (Summer 1997).
6. See the selections in P. Finney (ed.), The Origins of the Second World War, London, Arnold, 1997, pp. 90–112.
7. As in Graham Allison, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston, Little, Brown, 1971.
8. See M. Hollis and S. Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1991.
9. ‘On Writing International History: Chaps, Maps and Much More’, International Affairs, 73:3 (July 1997).
10. S. Smith, ‘The Discipline of International Relations’, International Affairs, p. 378.
11. C. S. Maier, In Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical Political Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987
12. M. J. Hogan, The Marshall Plan: America, Britain and the Reconstruction of Western Europe 1947–1952, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987
13. A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
14. For example, C. Tilly, The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1975.
15. See, typically, I. Clark, ‘Beyond the Great Divide: Globalization and the Theory of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 24:4 (1998)
16. Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999
17. J. Caparoso, ‘Across the Great Divide: Integrating Comparative and International Politics’, International Studies Quarterly, 41:4 (1997).