Joint Acceptance and Scientific Change: A Case Study

Episteme

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 248-265

  Andersen, Hanne ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010124507     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/epi.2010.0206     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andersen H. 1996. “Categorization, Anomalies, and the Discovery of Nuclear Fission.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27: 463–92.
2. Andersen H. 2000. “Kuhn's Account of Family Resemblance: A Solution to the Problem of Wide-Open Texture.” Erkenntnis 52: 313–37.
3. Andersen H. 2009. “Unexpected Discoveries, Graded Structures, and the Difference between Acceptance and Neglect.” In Meheus J. and Nickles T. (eds.), Models of Discovery and Creativity, pp. 1–27. Dordrecht: Springer.
4. Andersen H., Barker P., and Chen X. 2006. The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Fermi E., Amaldi E., D'Agostino O., Rasetti F., and Segrè E. 1934. “Artificial Radioactivity Produced by Neutron Bombardment.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 146(857): 483–500.
6. Frisch O. 1967. Interview by Charles Weiner. May 3. Niels Bohr Library & Archives, American Institute of Physics. Retrieved May 30, 2010, from http://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4616.html
7. Giere R. N. 2007. “Distributed Cognition without Distributed Knowledge.” Social Epistemology 21(3): 313–20.
8. Giere R. N. and Moffat B. 2003. “Distributed Cognition: Where the Cognitive and the Social Merge.” Social Studies of Science 33: 301–10.
9. Gilbert M. 1987. “Modelling Collective Belief.” Synthese 73: 185–204.
10. Gilbert M. 1989. On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Gilbert M. 2000. “Collective Belief and Scientific Change.” In Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory, pp. 37–49. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
12. Gilbert M. 2003. “The Structure of the Social Atom: Joint Commitment as the Foundation of Human Social Behavior.” In Schmitt F. F. (ed.), Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality, pp. 39–64. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13. Hahn O. and Strassmann F. 1939. “Über den Nachweis und das Verhalten der bei der Bestrahlung des Urans mittels Neutronen entstehenden Erdalkalimetalle.” Naturwissenschaften 27: 11–5.
14. Hoyningen-Huene P. 1992. Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Hutchins E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Nersessian N. J. 1989. “Conceptual Change in Science and in Science Education.” Synthese 80: 163–83.
17. Nersessian N. J. 2005. “Interpreting Scientific and Engineering Practices: Integrating the Cognitive, Social and Cultural Dimension.” In Gorman M., Tweney R., Gooding D., and Kincannon A. (eds.), Scientific and Technological Thinking, pp. 17–56. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Nersessian N. J. 2006. “The Cognitive-Cultural Systems of the Research Laboratory.” Organization Studies 27(1): 125–45.
19. Nersessian N. J. and Resnick L. B. 1989. “Comparing Historical and Intuitive Explanations of Motion: Does ‘Naive Physics’ Have a Structure?” Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 11: 412–20.
20. Rolin K. 2008. “Science as Collective Knowledge.” Cognitive Systems Research 9: 115–24.
21. Rosenwein R. E. 1994. “Social Influence in Science: Agreement and Dissent in Achieving Scientific Consensus.” In Shadish W. R. and Fuller S. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Science, pp. 262–85. New York: Guilford.
22. Rossini F. A. and Porter A. L. 1979. “Frameworks for Integrating Interdisciplinary Research.” Research Policy 8: 70–9.
23. Segrè E. 1967. Interview by Charles Weiner and Barry Richman. February 13. Niels Bohr Library & Archives, American Institute of Physics. Retrieved May 23, 2010, from http://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4876.html
24. Segrè E. 1970. Enrico Fermi, Physicist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Sime R.L. 1989. “Lise Meitner and the Discovery of Fission.” Journal of Chemical Education 66(5): 373–76.
26. Sime R. L. 1996. Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Sime R. L. 2000. “The Search for Transuranium Elements and the Discovery of Nuclear Fission.” Physics in Perspective 2: 48–62.
28. Staley K. W. 2007. “Evidential Collaborations: Epistemic and Pragmatic Considerations in ‘Group Belief.’” Social Epistemology 21(3): 321–35.
29. Thagard P. 1992. Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30. Weart S. R. 1983. “The Discovery of Fission and a Nuclear Physics Paradigm.” In Shea W. R. (ed.), Otto Hahn and the Rise of Nuclear Physics, pp. 91–133. Dortrecht: Kluwer.
31. Wray K. B. 2001. “Collective Belief and Acceptance.” Synthese 129: 319–33.
32. Wray K. B. 2003. “Is Science Really a Young Man's Game?” Social Studies of Science 33(1): 137–49.
33. Wray K. B. 2007. “Who Has Scientific Knowledge?” Social Epistemology 21(3): 337–47.