‘Antecedentless’ anaphors: Deixis, anaphora, or what? Some evidence from English and French

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 19-41

  Cornish, Francis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010096866     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226700000748     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Apotheloz, D. (1995). Pragmatique des operations de pointage et des expressions referentielles surdeterminees. Ms., l'Universite de Neuchatel.
2. Apotheloz, D. & Reichler-Beguelin, M.-J. (forthcoming). Demonstrative NPs and associativity. Journal of Pragmatics.
3. Blanche-Benveniste, C, Deulofeu, J., Stefanini, J. & van den Eynden, K. (1987). Pronom et syntaxe: I'approchepronominale et son application aufrancais. Paris: Selaf.
4. Bosch, P. (1983). Agreement and anaphora: a study of the role of pronouns in discourse. London: Academic Press.
5. Bosch, P. (1987). Pronouns under control? A reply to Liliane Tasmowski and Paul Verluyten. Journal of Semantics 5. 65-78.
6. Bosch, P. (1988). Representing and accessing focussed referents. Language and Cognitive Processes 3. 207-231.
7. Bosch, P. (1989). Coherence and cohesion: comments on Roger van de Velde's paper ‘Man, verbal text, inferencing and coherence’. In Heydrich, W., Neubauer, F., Petofi, J. S. & Sozer, E. (eds.) Connexity and coherence: analysis of text and discourse. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 218-227.
8. Conte, M.-E. (1992). Deixis textuelle et deixis am Phantasma. In Anschiitz, S. R. (ed.) Texte, Satze, Worter und Moneme: Festschrift fur Klaus Heger zum 65. Geburtstag. Heidelberg: Heidelberger Orientverlag. 153-161.
9. Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Cornish, F. (1986). Anaphoric relations in English and French: a discourse perspective. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.
11. Cornish, F. (1987). Anaphoric pronouns: under linguistic control, or signalling particular discourse representations? Journal of Semantics 5. 233-260.
12. Cornish, F. (1991). Non-discrete reference, discourse construction, and the French neuter clitic pronouns. Journal of French Language Studies 1. 123-138.
13. Cornish, F. (1992). So be it: the discourse-semantic roles of so and it. Journal of Semantics 9. 163-178.
14. Cornish, F. (1995). Reference anaphorique, reference deictique, et contexte predicatif et enonciatif. In Coquet, J.-C. (ed.) Special issue of Semiotiques 8: Anaphores: marqueurs et interpretations. 31-55.
15. Ehlich, K. (1982). Anaphora and deixis: same, similar, or different? In Jarvella & Klein (eds.). 3I5-338.
16. Greene, S. B., Gerrig, R. J., McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language 33. 511-526.
17. Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69. 274-307.
18. Hankamer, J. & Sag, I. (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 391-428.
19. Jarvella, R. J. & Klein, W. (eds.) (1982). Speech, place and action: studies in deixis and related topics. Chichester: John Wiley.
20. Kleiber, G. (1990a). Quand il n'a pas d'antecedent. Langages 97. 24-50.
21. Kleiber, G. (1990b). La se'mantique du prototype. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
22. Kleiber, G. (1992a). Y a-t-il un il ostensif? In Lorenzo, R. (ed.) Actos del XIX Congreso Internacional de Linguistica y Filoloxia Romdnicas. (La Corona, 1989.) Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. 485-504.
23. Kleiber, G. (1992b). Anaphore-deixis: deux approches concurrentes. In Morel & Danon-Boileau (eds.). 613-626.
24. Kleiber, G. (1994). Reference pronominale: comment analyser le pronom ill In Lallot, J. (ed.) LALIES: Actes des sessions de Linguistique et de Litte'rature 13. (Aussois, 31 August-5 September 1992). Paris: Presses de l'Ecole Normale Superieure. 79-141.
25. Levinson, S. C. (1987). Minimization and conversational inference. In Verschueren, J. & Bertuccelli-Papi, M. (eds.) The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 61-129.
26. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. (Vol. 2.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marslen-Wilson, W., Levy, E. & Tyler, L. K. (1982). Producing interpretable discourse: the establishment and maintenance of reference. In Jarvella & Klein (eds.). 339-378.
27. Milner, J.-C. (1982). Ordres el raisons de Langue. Paris: Seuil.
28. Morel, M.-A. & Danon-Boileau, L. (eds.) (1992). La deixis. (Colloque en Sorbonne, 8-9 June 1990.) Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
29. Muhlhausler, P. &Harre, R. (1990). Pronouns and people: the linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Nunberg, G. (1993). Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 16. 1-43.
31. Oakhill, J. & Garnham, A. (1992). Linguistic prescriptions and anaphoric reality. Text 12. 161-182.
32. Peirce, C. S. (1955). Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs. In Biichler, J. (ed.) Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.
33. Reboul, A. (1994). L'anaphore pronominale: le probleme de l'attribution des referents. In Moeschler, J., Reboul, A., Luscher, J.-M. & Jayez, J. (eds.) Langage el pertinence. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy. 105-173.
34. Reichler-Beguelin, M.-J. (1989). Anaphores,connecteurset processusinferentiels. In Rubattel, C. (ed.) Modeles du discours. Recherches actuelles en Suisse Romande. Berne: Peter Lang. 27-48.
35. Reichler-Beguelin, M.-J. (1993). Anaphores associatives non-lexicales: incompletude macrosyntaxique? In Karolak, S. & Muryn, T. (eds.) Comple'tude et Incompletude dans les Langues Romanes et Slaves: actes du Vie Colloque International de Linguistique Romane et Slave. (Krakow, 29 September-3 October 1991.) 327-379.
36. Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
37. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. B. (eds.) Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 27-48.
38. Rosenberg, S. (1970). Modern French ce: the neuter pronoun in adjectival predication. The Hague: Mouton.
39. Schiffrin, D. (1990). Between text and context: deixis, anaphora, and the meaning of then. Text 10. 245-270.
40. Tasmowski-de Ryck, L. & Verluyten, P. (1982). Linguistic control of pronouns. Journal of Semantics 1. 323-346.
41. Tasmowski-de Ryck, L. & Verluyten, P. (1985). Control mechanisms of anaphora. Journal of Semantics 5. 341-370.
42. Tesniere, L. (1969). Elements de syntaxe structurale. (2e edition revue et corrigee.) Paris: Klincksieck.
43. Yule, G. (1979). Pragmatically controlled anaphora. Lingua 49. 127-135.
44. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1992). De la deixis a l'anaphore: quelques jalons. In Morel & Danon-Boileau (eds.). 603-612.