The CRISP colorectal cancer risk prediction tool: an exploratory study using simulated consultations in Australian primary care

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-11

  Walker, Jennifer G ^a   Bickerstaffe, Adrian ^b   Hewabandu, Nadira ^b   Maddumarachchi, Sanjay ^b   Dowty, James G ^b   Jenkins, Mark ^b   Pirotta, Marie ^a   Walter, Fiona M ^a,c,d   Emery, Jon D ^a,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bowel cancer screening; Cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer risk assessment; Colorectal cancer risk prediction; General practitioners; Primary care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 85009986150     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0407-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C. al e: GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [online]. In. Lyon, France; 2013.
2. Burton H, Chowdhury S, Dent T, Hall A, Pashayan N, Pharoah P. Public health implications from COGS and potential for risk stratification and screening. Nat Genet. 2013;45(4):349-51.
3. Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee: Guidelines for the Prevention, Early Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer. In: The Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network,. Sydney Australia; 2005.
4. Ait Ouakrim D, Lockett T, Boussioutas A, Keogh L, Flander LB, Winship I, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA. Screening practices of Australian men and women categorized as “at or slightly above average risk” of colorectal cancer. CCC. 2012;23(11):1853-64.
5. Ait Ouakrim D, Boussioutas A, Lockett T, Winship I, Giles GG, Flander LB, Keogh L, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA. Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res. 2012;5(2):240-7.
6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: monitoring report 2012-2013. In., vol. 2014, Cancer series 84. Cat. no. CAN 81. edn. Canberra, Australia; 2014.
7. Usher-Smith J, Emery J, Hamilton W, Griffin S, Walter F. Risk prediction tools for cancer in primary care. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:1645-50.
8. Walker J, Licqurish S, Chiang P, Pirotta M, Emery J. Cancer risk assessment tools in primary care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(5):480-9.
9. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008, 337(a1655).
10. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321(7262):694-6.
11. Zuiderent-Jerak T, Forland F, Macbeth F. Guidelines should reflect all knowledge, not just clinical trials. BMJ. 2012;345(e6702).
12. Win A, MacInnis R, Hopper J, Jenkins M. Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(3):398-410.
13. Freedman A, Slattery M, Ballard-Barbash R, Willis G, Cann B, Pee D, Gail M, Pfeiffer R. Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(5):686-93.
14. Emery J, Morris H, Goodchild R, Fanshawe T, Prevost A, Bobrow M, Kinmonth A-L. The GRAIDS trial: a cluster randomised controlled trial of computer decision support for the management of familial cancer risk in primary care. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(4):486-93.
15. Trevena L, Zikmund-Fisher B, Edwards A, Gaissmaier W, Galesic M, Han P, King J, Lawson M, Linder S, Lipkus I. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S7.
16. Spiegelhalter D, Pearson M, Short I. Visualizing uncertainty about the future. Science. 2011;333(6048):1393-400.
17. Gigerenzer G, Edwards A. Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. BMJ. 2003;741-744.
18. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535-54.
19. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Finch T, Kennedy A, Mair F, O’Donnell C. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):63.
20. Sociocultural Research Consultants ('SCRC') 2014: dedoose: Great Research Made Easy. Available from: http://www.dedoose.com [Accessed 10 Sept 2014].
21. Australian Government Department of Health. Health assessment for people aged 45 to 49 years who are at risk of developing chronic disease. In: Note A27,. Edited by Medical Benefits Schedule. Australia; 2014.
22. Holloway R, Wilkinson C, Peters T, Russell I, Cohen D, Hale J, Rogers C H. Cluster-randomised trial of risk communication to enhance informed uptake of cervical screening. Br J Cancer. 2003;53(493):620-5.
23. Emery J, Morris H, Goodchild R, Fanshawe T, Prevost A, Bobrow M, Kinmonth A-L: The GRAIDS Trial: a cluster randomised controlled trial of computer decision support for the management of familial cancer risk in primary care. Br J Cancer 2007, 97(4):486-493
24. Ruffin M, Nease D, Sen A, Pace W, Wang C, Acheson L, Rubinstein W, O’Neill S, Gramling R. Effect of preventive messages tailored to family history on health behaviors: the family healthware impact trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(1):3-11.
25. Chiang PP, Glance D, Walker J, Walter F, Emery J. Implementing a risk tool into general practice consultations: an exploratory study using simulated consultations with Australian general practitioners. B J Cancer. 2015;112:S77-83.
26. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(2):104-12.
27. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2013. Nursing and midwifery workforce 2012. National Health Workforce Series no. 6. Cat. no. HWL 52. Canberra: AIHW, Australia
28. O’Hagan J, Davies L, Pears R. The use of simulated patients in the assessment of actual clinical performance in general practice. N Z Med J. 1986;99(815):948-51.