Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Moreno Mateos, David ^a,b,c   Barbier, Edward B ^d   Jones, Peter C ^e   Jones, Holly P ^e   Aronson, James ^f,g   López López, José A ^h   McCrackin, Michelle L ⁱ   Meli, Paula ^c,j   Montoya, Daniel ^k,l   Rey Benayas, José M ^c,m  

^a BASQUE CENTRE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE BC3   (Spain)

^b BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^c Fundación Internacional Para la Restauración de Ecosistemas   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^e NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^g CNRS   (France)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^j Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos AC   (Mexico)

^k Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Paul Sabatier University   (France)

^l CEMAGREF   (France)

^m UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; NITROGEN;

ABUNDANCE; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIODIVERSITY; CARBON CYCLE; DISTURBANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; NITROGEN CYCLE; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOME; CARBON CYCLING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; HURRICANE; NITROGEN CYCLING; NONHUMAN; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; AGRICULTURE; CARBON CYCLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST; GRASSLAND; META ANALYSIS; MINING; NITROGEN CYCLE; WETLAND;

AGRICULTURE; BIODIVERSITY; CARBON CYCLE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FORESTS; GRASSLAND; MINING; NITROGEN CYCLE; WETLANDS;

EID: 85009950402     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14163     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R., Boucher, T. Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316, 1866-1869 (2007).
2. Hansen, M. C., et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850-853 (2013).
3. Chapron, G., et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern humandominated landscapes. Science 346, 1517-1519 (2014).
4. Crowther, T. W., et al. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525, 201-205 (2015).
5. Copeland, C. Wetlands: An Overview Of Issues (Congressional Research Service, 2013).
6. OERI. Cross-cut Budget 2016 Working Document (2015). Available at http://www.evergladesrestoration.gov/content/cross-cut-budget.html.
7. Zhang, P., et al. China's forest policy for the 21st century. Science 288, 2135-2136 (2000).
8. Rey Benayas, J. M., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A., Bullock, J. M. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325, 1121-1124 (2009).
9. Jones, H. P., Schmitz, O. J. Rapid recovery of damaged ecosystems. PLoS ONE 4, e5653 (2009).
10. Moreno-Mateos, D., Power, M. E., Comn, F. A., Yockteng, R. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001247 (2012).
11. Newbold, T., et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45-50 (2015).
12. Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L., Nowak, M. A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65-67 (1994).
13. Dullinger, S., et al. Europe's other debt crisis caused by the long legacy of future extinctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7342-7347 (2013).
14. Vellend, M., et al. Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19456-19459 (2013).
15. Dornelas, M., et al. Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344, 296-299 (2014).
16. Gonzalez, A., et al. Estimating local biodiversity change: a critique of papers claiming no net loss of local diversity. Ecology 97, 1949-1960 (2016).
17. Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D. Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 81, 88-98 (2000).
18. Poorter, L., et al. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530, 211-214 (2016).
19. Davidson, E. A., et al. Recuperation of nitrogen cycling in Amazonian forests following agricultural abandonment. Nature 447, 995-998 (2007).
20. Gamez-Virues, S., et al. Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Nat. Commun. 6, 8568 (2015).
21. Foley, J. A. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570-574 (2005).
22. Curran, M., Hellweg, S., Beck, J. Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy Ecol. Appl. 24, 617-632 (2014).
23. Cole, L. E. S., Bhagwat, S. A., Willis, K. J. Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance. Nat. Commun. 5, 3906 (2014).
24. Convention on Biological Diversity. COP 11 Decision X1/16. Ecosystem Restoration 2012. Available at http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/id=12268.
25. Minnemeyer, S., Laestadius, L., Sizer, N., Saint-Laurent, C., Potapov, P. A World of Opportunity for Forest and Landscape Restoration (2011). Available at http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/world-of-opportunity-brochure-2011-09.pdf.
26. European Parliament. Our life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: an EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (2011/2307(INI)). Vol. 2020 (2012). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/pdf/EP-resolution-april2012.pdf.
27. Possingham, H. P., Bode, M., Klein, C. J. Optimal conservation outcomes require both restoration and protection. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002052 (2015).
28. Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Kandy, D., Bennett, G. Update: State of Biodiversity Markets. Forest Trends. Washington, DC (2011). Available at http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc-2848.pdf.
29. Maron, M., Gordon, A., Mackey, B. G., Possingham, H. P., Watson, J. E. M. Conservation: stop misuse of biodiversity offsets. Nature 523, 401-403 (2015).
30. Zedler, J., Kercher, S. Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30, 39-74 (2005).
31. Meli, P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Balvanera, P., Martnez Ramos, M. Restoration enhances wetland biodiversity and ecosystem service supply, but results are context-dependent: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e93507 (2014).
32. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Grp, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (reprinted from annals of internal medicine). Phys. Ther. 89, 873-880 (2009).
33. Tummers, B. DataThief III. (2006). Available at http://datathief.org/.
34. Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., Rubel, F. World Map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Zeitschrift 15, 259-263 (2006).
35. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. The Ramsar Convention Manual: A Guide to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), 4th edn (Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2006).
36. Moreno-Mateos, D., et al. Ecosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 1528-1537 (2015).
37. Mergensen, K., Schmid, C. H., Jennions, M. D., Gurevitch, J. in: Handbook of Meta-Analyisis in Ecology and Evolution, 89-107 (Princeton University Press, 2013).
38. Crouzeilles, R., et al. A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success. Nat. Commun. 7, 1-8 (2016).
39. Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P. S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150-1156 (1999).
40. Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P. S., Jones, M. H. Meta-analysis in ecology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 32, 199-247 (2001).
41. Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat. Med. 21, 1539-1558 (2002).
42. Bullock, J. M., Aronson, J., Newton, A. C., Pywell, R. F., Rey-Benayas, J. M. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 541-549 (2011).
43. Rosenberg, M. S., Hannah, R. R., Gurevitch, J., Rothstein, H. R., Jurevitch, J. in: Handbook of Meta-analyisis in Ecology and Evolution (eds Koricheva, J., Gurevitch, J., Mengersen, K.) 61-71 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2013).
44. Viechtbauer, W. Conductiing meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1-48 (2010).
45. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2014). Available at https://www.r-project.org/about.html.