Constraint Analysis for Aircraft Landing in Distributed Crewing Contexts

Procedia Manufacturing

Volumn 3, Issue , 2015, Pages 2682-2689

  Varga, Judit ^a   Iacob, Claudia ^a   Grote, Matt ^a   Stanton, Neville ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive Work Analysis; Distributed crewing; Mixed methods integration; Single pilot operations; System redesign

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009919319     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23519789     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.658     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. [1] Harris, D., Stanton, N.A., Starr, A. (2014). Modelling and Analysis of Single Pilot Operations in Commercial Aviation. HCI-Aero, 2014.
2. [2] Wolter, C.A., Gore, B.F. (2015). A Validated Task Analysis of the Single Pilot Operations Concept. NASA Working Papers.
3. [3] Vicente, K.J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. CRC Press.
4. [4] Wilson, J., Harron, G., Lyall, B.,Hoffa, B., Jones, E. (2013). Understanding Single Pilot Operations (SPO) Certification Requirements. Prepared for NASA Langley Research Center.
5. [5] Schutte, P.C., Goodrich, K.H., Cox, D.E., Jackson, E.B., Palmer, M.T., Pope, A.T., Schlecht, R.W., Tedjojuwono, K.K., Trujillo, A.C., Williams, R.A., Kinney, J.B., Barry, Jr, J.S. (2007). The Naturalistic Flight Deck System: An Integrated System Concept for Improved Single-Pilot Operations. NASA.
6. [6] Lachter, J., Brandt, S.L., Battiste, V., Ligda, S.V., Matessa, M., Johnson, W.W. (2014). Toward Single Pilot Operations: Developing a Ground Station. Available online: http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/Lachter_etal_2014_2.pdf.
7. [7] Wilson, J.R., Fundamentals of systems ergonomics /human factors, Applied Ergonomics 45:1 (2014), 5–13.
8. [8] Stanton, N.A., McIllroy, R.C., Harvey, C., Blainey, S., Hickford, A., Preston, J.M., Ryan, B., Following the Cognitive Work Analysis train of thought: Exploring the constraints of modal shift to rail transport, Ergonomics 56:3 (2013), 522–540.
9. [9] Jenkins, D.P., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H. and Salmon, P.M. (2009) Cognitive Work Analysis: coping with complexity. Ashgate: Aldershot.
10. [10] Fiske, S.T. (2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. United States of America: Wiley.
11. [11] The Guardian (2015). Germanwings crash prompts airlines to introduce cockpit ‘rule of two’. Available online: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/26/germanwings-crash-prompts-airlines-to-introduce-cockpit-rule-of-two.
12. [12] Fitzpatrick, K.R. (2014). Points of Convergence in Music Education: The Use of Data Labels as a Strategy for Mixed Methods Integration. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1-19. DOI: 10.1177/1558689814560264.
13. [13] Mason, J. (2006). Six strategies for mixing methods and linking data in social science research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. NCRM Working Paper Series, 4/06.
14. [14] Tyers, R. (2015). Nudging the Jetset to offset: Voluntary carbon offsetting for flying, and the limits of ‘nudging’. Conference of the Political Studies Association, 2015.
15. [15] Bazeley, P. (2010). Computer Assisted Integration of Mixed Methods Data Sources and Analysis. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.) SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc.