Economic assessment of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a marine fuel for CO2 carriers compared to marine gas oil (MGO)

Energy

Volumn 121, Issue , 2017, Pages 772-780

  Yoo, Byeong Yong ^a  

^a Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co Ltd   (South Korea)

Author keywords

CCS; CO2carrier; CO2transport; LNG; LNG fueled ship; Marine fuel

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; CARBON CAPTURE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; CRUDE OIL; EMISSION CONTROL; FUEL STORAGE; FUEL SYSTEMS; SHIPS; SULFUR;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); CO2CARRIER; CO2TRANSPORT; ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG); MARINE FUELS; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT;

LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPETITIVENESS; CRUDE OIL; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY MARKET; HEAVY OIL; INFRASTRUCTURE; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; MARINE ENVIRONMENT;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; NORTH SEA;

EID: 85009909991     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.061     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. [1] Thomson, H., Cobette, J.J., Winebrake, J.J., Natural gas as a marine fuel. Energy Policy 87 (2015), 153–167.
2. 2 storage resource potential. 2016.
3. 2 transport by ship. 2010 A case study for the Netherlands.
4. 2 liquid logistics shipping concept (LLSC): overall supply chain optimization. 2011.
5. [5] DNV-GL, News: China introduces sulphur requirements for marine fuels (REV). 2016 Available from: https://www.dnvgl.com/news/china-introduces-sulphur-requirements-for-marine-fuels-rev–58014.
6. 2 carrier for ship-based CCS. 2011.
7. [7] Yoo, B.Y., Choi, D.K., Huh, C., Kang, S.G., Kim, I.S., A feasibility study on CO2marine transport in South Korea. Energy Procedia 37 (2013), 3199–3211.
8. [8] Skagestad, R., Eldrup, N., Hansen, H.R., Stefan, B., Mathisen, A., Lach, A., et al. Ship transport of CO2. Status and technology gaps. Tel-Tek Report No. 2214090 Report prepared for Gassnove by Tel-Tek, 2014, 1–52.
9. [9] Roussanaly, S., Brunsvold, A.L., Hognes, E.S., Benchmarking of CO2transport technologies: Part II – offshore pipeline and shipping to offshore site. Int J Greenh Gas Control 28C (2014), 283–299.
10. 2 transport. 2011.
11. [11] DNV-GL, LNG as ship fuel: the future –Today. 2014.
12. 2., 2004.
13. [13] Ansell, D.V., Dicks, B., et al. A review of the problems posed by spills of Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO). Proceedings of 2001 international oil Spill conference, 2001 Tampa, Florida, USA.
14. [14] The International Group of Liquefied Natural Gas Importers (GIIGNL), The LNG industry: GIIGNL annual report 2016 edition., 2016.
15. [15] Knoope, M.M.J., Ramirez, A., Faaij, A.P.C., Investing in CO2infrastructure under uncertainty: a comparison between ships and pipelines. Int J Greenh Gas Control 41 (2015), 174–193.
16. [16] Buurma, C., Bloomberg article: why shippers are turning to LNG-Powered vessels. 2015 Available from: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-23/lng-powered-ships-gain-as-rising-output-answers-oil-price-tumult.
17. [17] Shinas, O., Butler, M., Feasibility and commercial considerations of LNG-fueled ships. Ocean Eng 122 (2016), 84–96.
18. [18] Germanisher Lloyd(GL), Costs and benefits of LNG as ship fuel for container vessels., 2013 Report on GL and MAN joint study.
19. [19] Loeve, D., Neele, F., Hendriks, C., Koornneef, J., Transport and storage economics of CCS networks in The Netherlands: analysis of CCS business cases in The Netherlands (Phase 1). CATO2, CATO2-WP2.4-D05, 2013, 1–59.
20. [20] Ship & Bunker, MGO price in Rotterdam. 2016 Available from: http://shipandbunker.com/prices/emea/nwe/nl-rtm-rotterdam#MGO.
21. [21] Quandl, Natural gas price, Europe. 2016 Available from: https://www.quandl.com/data/WORLDBANK/WLD_NGAS_EUR-Natural-gas-Price-Europe-mmbtu.
22. [22] Semolinos, P., Olsen, G., Giacosa, A., LNG as marine fuel: challenges to be overcome, LNG17. 2013.
23. 2 emission indexing for use in trials”. 2008.
24. [24] Villar, J.A., Joutz, F.L., The Relationship between crude oil and natural gas prices. Technical Report, 2006, Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas, Washington, DC. USA.
25. [25] Ship & Bunker, HFO price in Rotterdam. 2016 Available from: http://shipandbunker.com/prices/emea/nwe/nl-rtm-rotterdam#IFO380.
26. [26] Danish Maritime Authority, North European LNG infrastructure project full report., 2012.
27. [27] Anttun, J., Hanninen, O., Jalkanen, J., Johansson, L., Prank, M., Sofiev, M., et al. Costs and benefits of low-sulphur fuel standard for Baltic Sea shipping. J Environ Manag 184 (2016), 431–440.