The effects of pre-existing inappropriate highlighting onreading comprehension

Reading Research and Instruction

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 217-223

  Silvers, Vicki L ^a   Kreiner, David S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009628892     PISSN: 08860246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388079709558240     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Brennan, S., Winograd, P. N., Bridge, C. A., & Hiebert, E. H. (1986). A comparison of observer reports and self-reports of study practices used by college students. National Reading Conference Year Book, 35, 353-58.
2. Brown, J. I., Fischo, M. S. & Hanna, G. (1993). Neison-Denny Reading Test, Form H. Riverside Publishing Co. Chicago, IL.
3. Feldmann, M. L. & Thomas, S. (1994). The effect of highlighting on recall. Poster Presentation at Midwestern Psychological Association in Chicago, Illnois.
4. Fisher, L., Coury, B. G., Tengs, T. O. & Duffey, S. A. (1989). Minimizing the time to search visual displays: the role of highlighting. Human Factors, 31 (2), 167-82.
5. Hogrebe, M. C. & Nist, S. L. (1987). The underlining and annotating in remembering textual information. Reading Research and Instruction, 27 (1), 12-25.
6. Johnson, D. D. & Von Hoff Johnson, B. (1986). Highlighting vocabulary in inferential comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading, 29 (7), 622-25.
7. Johnson, L. (1988). Effects of underlining textbook sentences on passage and sentence retention. Reading Research and Instruction, 28 (1), 18-32.
8. Peterson, S. E. (1992). The cognitive functions of underlining as a study technique. Reading Research and Instruction, 31 (2), 49-56.
9. Wade, S. E. & Trathen, W. (1989). Effect of self-selected study methods on learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81.