Empirical advances in technology-assisted instruction for students with mild and moderate disabilities

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 526-553

  Fitzgerald, Gail E ^a   Koury, Kevin A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009626986     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1996.10782181     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bahr, C., Kinzer, C., & Rieth, H. (1991). An analysis of the effects of teacher training and student grouping on reading comprehension skills among mildly handicapped high school students using computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11(3), 136-154.
2. Bing, J., Swicsgood, R, Delaney, E., & Hallum, D. (1993). Technology and whole language for students with learning disabilities. LD Forum, 79(1), 6-12.
3. Boone, R., & Higgins, K. (1993). Hypermedia basal readers: Three years of school-based research. Journal of Special Education Technology, 72(2), 86-106.
4. Bottge, B., & Hasselbring, T. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59(6), 556-566.
5. Brown, A.L. (1994). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
6. Camine, D. (1989). Teaching complex content to learning disabled students: The role of technology. Exceptional Children, 55(6), 524-533.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65-80.
8. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Integrated media: Toward a theoretical framework for utilizing their potential. Journal of Special Education, 12(2), 1-10.
9. Cohen, A., Torgesen, J.K., & Torgesen, J.L. (1988). Improving speed and accuracy of word recognition in reading disabled children: An evaluation of two computer program variations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 333-340.
10. Cosden, M., Goldman, S., & Hine, M. (1990). Learning handicapped students’ interactions during a microcomputer-based group writing activity. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10(4), 220-232.
11. Daiute, C., & Morse, F. (1994). Access to knowledge and expression: Multimedia writing tools for students with diverse needs and strengths. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 221-256.
12. Dalton, B., Winbury, N., & Morocco, C. (1990). “If you could just push a button”: Two fourth grade boys with learning disabilities learn to use a computer spelling checker. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10(4), 177-191.
13. Edwards, B., Blackhurst, A., & Koorland, M. (1995). Computer-assisted constant time delay prompting to teach abbreviation spelling to adolescents with mild learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(4), 301-311.
14. Edyburn, D. (1991). Fact retrieval by students with and without learning handicaps using print and electronic encyclopedias. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11(2), 75-90.
15. Fuchs, L., Bahr, C., & Rieth, H. (1989). Effects of goal structures and performance contingencies on the math performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(9), 554-560.
16. Gleason, M., Camine, D., & Vala, N. (1991). Cumulative versus rapid introduction of new information. Exceptional Children, 57(4). 353-358.
17. Hasselbring, T., Goin, L., & Bransford, J. (1988). Developing math automa-ticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(6), 1-7.
18. Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (1991). Hypermedia CAI: A supplement to an elementary school basal reader program. Journal of Special Education Technology, 77(1), 1-56.
19. Hine, M., Goldman, S., & Cosden, M. (1990). Error monitoring by learning handicapped students engaged in collaborative microcomputer-based writing. The Journal of Special Education, 23(4), 407-422.
20. Hofmeister, A., Engelmann, S., & Camine, D. (1989). Developing and validating science education videodiscs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(8), 665-677.
21. Hollingsworth, M., & Woodward, J. (1993). Integrated learning: Explicit strategies and their role in problem-solving instmction for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59(5), 444-455.
22. Horton, S., Lovitt, T., Givens, A., & Nelson, R. (1989). Teaching social studies to high school students with academic handicaps in a mainstreaming setting: Effects of a computerized study guide. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22, 102-107.
23. Horton, S., Lovitt, T., & Slocum, T. (1988). Teaching geography to high school students with academic deficits: Effects of a computerized map tutorial. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 371-379.
24. Kinney, R, Stevens, K., & Schuster, J. (1988). The effects of CAI and time delay: a systematic program for teaching spelling. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9(2), 61-72.
25. Kulik, C., & Kulik, J. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1-2), 75-94.
26. Landeen, J., & Adams, D. (1988). Computer-assisted drill and practice for behaviorally handicapped learners: Proceed with caution. Education and Treatment of Children, 77(3), 218-229.
27. Learning Technology Center. (1992). The Adventures of Jasper Woodbury [Computer software and laser videodisc], Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Learning Technology Center.
28. Lin, A., Podell, D., & Toumaki-Rein, N. (1994). CAI and the development of automaticity in mathematics skills in students with and without mild mental handicaps. Computers in the Schools, 77(1), 43-58.
29. Lin, A., Podell, D., & Rein, N. (1991). The effects of CAI on word recognition in mildly mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11(1), 16-25.
30. Lundberg, I., & Olofsson, A. (1993). Can computer speech support reading comprehension? Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 283-293.
31. Lundberg, I., & Olofsson, A. (1993). Can computer speech support reading comprehension? Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 283-293.
32. MacArthur, C., Haynes, J., Malouf, D., Harris, K., & Owings, M. (1990). Computer-assisted instruction with learning disabled students: Achievement, engagement, and other factors that influence achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 311-328.
33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
34. Office of Special Education Programs. (1994). Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
35. Okolo, C. (1992a). The effect of computer-assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the arithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality: A Research Journal, 3(4), 195-211.
36. Okolo, C. (1992b). The effects of computer-based attribution retraining on the attributions, persistence, and mathematics computation of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(5), 327-334.
37. Okolo, C. (1992b). The effects of computer-based attribution retraining on the attributions, persistence, and mathematics computation of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(5), 327-334.
38. Pellegrino, J., Hickey, D., Heath, A., Rewey, K., Vye, N., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991). Assessing the outcomes of an innovative instructional program: The 1990-1991 implementation of the “Adventures of Jasper Woodbury” (Tech. Rep. No. 91-111). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Learning Technology Center.
39. Podell, D., Toumaki-Rein, N., & Lin, A. (1992). Automatization of mathematics skills via computer-assisted instruction among students with mild-moderate handicaps. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27(3), 200-206.
40. Robinson, S., DePascale, C., & Roberts, F. (1989). Computer-delivered feedback in group-based instruction: Effects for learning disabled students in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5(1), 28-35.
41. Roblyer, M.D., Castine, W.H., & King, F.J. (1988). Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction: A review of recent research. New York: The Haworth Press.
42. Stevens, K., Blackhurst, A.E., & Slaton, D. (1991). Teaching memorized spelling with a microcomputer: Time delay and computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(1), 153-160.
43. Sunburst. (1983). The Factory [Computer program]. Pleasantville, NY: Author.
44. Thorkildsen, R. (1989). An investigation of the reinforcing effects of feedback on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9(3), 125-135.
45. Torgesen, J. (1986). Computer-assisted instruction with learning disabled children. In J. Torgesen & B. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 417-435). New York: Academic Press.
46. Torgesen, J., Waters, M., Cohen, A., & Torgesen, J. (1988). Improving sight-word recognition skills in LD children: An evaluation of three computer program variations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(2), 125-132.
47. Van Daal, V., & Van der Leij, A. (1992). Computer-based reading and spelling practice for children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(3), 186-195.
48. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., & Gordon, J. (1992). Early spelling acquisition: Does writing really beat the computer? Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 223-228.
49. Wetzel, K. (1993). Speaking to write: Can students with learning disabilities learn to use speech recognition technology to enhance written communication. LD Forum, 19, 38-16.
50. Wise, B., & Olson, R. (1994). Computer speech and the remediation of reading and spelling problems. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(3), 201-220.
51. Wizer, D. (1995). Small group instruction using microcomputers Focus on group behaviors. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(1), 121-132.
52. Woodward, J., Carnine, D., & Collins, M. (1988). Closing the performance gap: CAI and secondary education for the mildly handicapped. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(3), 265-286.
53. Woodward, J., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). Teaching problem solving through computer simulations. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 72-86.
54. Zimmerman, S. (1988). Problem-solving tasks on the microcomputer: A look at the performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2 (10), 637-641