Two analytical approaches for quantifying physical habitat as a limit to aquatic ecosystems

International Journal of River Basin Management

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 191-199

  Milhous, Robert T ^a   Bartholow, John M ^b  

^a FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA   (Canada)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fish production modeling; Habitat limits; Limiting factor; Physical habitat; SALMOD

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009594381     PISSN: 15715124     EISSN: 18142060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2006.9635288     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bartholow, J.M. (2005). “Modeling Chinook Salmon with Salmod on the Sacramento River, California,” Hydroecol. Appl., 14(1), 193-219.
2. Bartholow, J.M., Laake, J.L., Stalnaker, C.B. and Williamson, S.C. (1993). “A Salmonid Population Model with Emphasis on Habitat Limitations,” Rivers, 4(4), 265-279.
3. Bartholow, J., Heasley, J., Sandelin, J., Coughlan, B.A.K., Laake, J. and Moos, A. (2001). Salmod: A population model for Salmonids: User’s Manual. Version 2.0. USGS/FORT Internal Publication. 89 pp. Available on the Internet at http://www.fort.usgs.gov/products/Publications/4046/4046.asp.
4. Bovee, K.D., Newcomb, T.J. and Coon, T.J. (1994). Relations between habitat variability and population dynamics of bass in the Huron River, Michigan. National Biological Survey Biological Report 22. 79 pp.
5. Cade, B.S. and Noon, B.R. (2003). “A Gentle Introduction to Quantile Regression for Ecologists,” Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 1(8), 412-420.
6. Clarke, K.D. and Scruton, D.A. (1997). “The Benthic Community of Stream Riffles in Newfoundland, Canada and its Relation to Selected Physical and Chemical Parameters,” Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 12(1), 113-121.
7. Dunhan, J.B., Cade, B.S. and Terrell, J.W. (2002). “Influences of Spatial and Temporal Variation of Fish-Habitat Relationships Defined by Regression Quantiles,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 131(1), 86-98.
8. Gore, J.A. and Nestler, J.M. (1988). “Instream Flow Studies in Perspective,” Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 2(1), 93-101.
9. McBean, E.A. and Al-Nassri, S. (1988). “Uncertainty in Suspended Sediment Transport Curves,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ASCE, 114(1), 63-74.
10. Milhous, R.T., Updike, M.A. and Schneider, D.M. (1989). Physical Habitat Simulation System Reference Manual - Version II. Instream Flow Information Paper No. 26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Biological Report 89(16). Washington, D.C. v.p.
11. Minshall, G.W. (1984). Information package from P. Nelson, National Ecology Center, Fort Collins, CO. Category 2 utilization curves for total benthic biomass. Unpublished data. Idaho State University. Pocatello, ID. 10 pp.
12. Nordin, C.F. Jr. (1990). “Discussion of ‘McBean, E.A. and Al-Nassri, S. Uncertainty in Suspended Sediment Transport Curves’ in Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ASCE. Vol. 114, No. 1, January 1988,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ASCE, 116(1), 145-148.
13. Orth, D.J. and Maughan, O.E. (1982). “Evaluation of the Incremental Methodology for Recommending Instream Flows for Fishes,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 111(4), 413-445.
14. Orth, D.J. (1987). “Ecological Considerations in the Development and Application of Instream Flow-habitat Models,” Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 1, 171-181.
15. Terrell, J. Personal communication. Data collected in 2002 as part of a whirling disease study of Willow Creek, Colorado.