Sales technology applications: Exploring group support systems in sales management applications

Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 65-77

  Dishman, Paul ^a   Aytes, Kregg ^a  

^a IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009592776     PISSN: 08853134     EISSN: 15577813     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08853134.1996.10754045     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Albanese, R. and D.D. Van Fleet (1985), “Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free Riding Tendency,” Academy of Management Review, 10, 244-255.
2. Barr, Steven H. and Edward J. Conlon (1994), “Effects of Distribution of Feedback in Work Groups,” Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3)., 641-655.
3. Connolly, T., L. M. Jessup, and J. Valacich (1990), “Idea generation using a GDSS: Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone,” Management Science, 36 (6), 689-703.
4. Curren, Mary T., Valerie S. Folkes, and Joel H. Steckel (1992), “Explanations of Successful and Unsuccessful Marketing Decisions: The Decision Maker’s Perspective,” The Journal of Marketing, 56 (April), 18-31.
5. Dennis, A. R., C.K. Tyran, D.R. Vogel, and J.F. Nunamaker (1990), “An Evaluation of Electronic Meeting Support for Strategic Management,” Proceedings ofICIS, 37-52.
6. Dennis, A. R., C.K. Tyran, D.R. Vogel, J.S. Valacich, and J.F. Nunamaker (1990), “An Experimental Investigation of Group Size in an Electronic Meeting System Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20 (5), 1049-1057.
7. Deshpande, Rohit and Gerald Zaltman (1987), “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Use of Marketing Information in Customer and Industrial Firms,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (February) 114-118.
8. Diehl, M. and W. Stroebe (1987), “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (3), 497-509.
9. Ellis, C.A., S. J. Gibbs, and G. L. Rein (1991), “Groupware: Some Issues and Experiences,” Communications of the ACM, 34 (1), 39-58.
10. Finley, Michael (1991), “Welcome to the Electronic Meeting,” Training, (July), 29-32.
11. Gallupe, R. B., W. Cooper, and L. Bastianutti (1990), “Why is Electronic Brainstorming More Productive than Traditional Brainstorming,” Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference Proceedings, Information Systems Division (Whistler, Canada), 82-92.
12. Glazer, Rashi, Joel H. Steckel and Russell S. Winer (1987), “Group Process and Decision Performance in a Simulated Marketing Environment,” Journal of Business Research, 15, 545-557.
13. Hackman, J.R. and R.E. Kaplan (1974), “Interventions into Group Process: An Approach to Improving the Effectiveness of Groups,” Decision Sciences, 5, 459-480.
14. Hill, G.W. (1982), “Group versus individual performance Are N + 1 heads better than one?” Psychological Bulletin, 91 (3), 517-539.
15. Jablin, F.M. and D.R. Siebold (1978), “Implications for Problem Solving Groups of Empirical Research on ‘Brainstorming’: A Critical Review of the Literature,” The Southern States Speech Communication Journal, 43, 327-356.
16. Jessup, L. M., T. Connolly, and J. Galegher (1990), “The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task,” MIS Quarterly, 14 (3), 312-321.
17. Lam, H. and G. Trommsdorff (1973), “Group Versus Individual Performance on Tasks Requiring Ideational Proficiency (Brainstorming): A review,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 361-387.
18. Lee, Hanjoon, Frank Acito, and Ralph L. Day (1987), “Evaluations and Use of Market Research by Decision Makers: A Behavioral Simulation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (May) 187-196.
19. Malone, T.W. and J.F. Rockart (1994), “Computers, Networks, and the Corporation,” in Management of Information Systems, (Paul Gray, William King, Ephraim McLean, and Hugh Watson, eds.), New York: Dryden.
20. McLeod, Poppy L. (1992). “An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis,” Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 257-280.
21. Nagasundaram, M. and A.R. Dennis (1993), “When a Group is Not a Group: The Cognitive Foundation of Group Idea Generation,” Small Group Research, 24(4), 463-489.
22. Nunamaker, J. F., L.M. Applegate, and B.R. Konsynski (1988), “Computer-aided Deliberation: Model Management and Group Decision Support,” Journal of Operations Research, 36 (6), 826-848.
23. Nunamaker, J. F., L.M. Applegate, A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D.R. Vogel, and J.F. George (1991), “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work,” Communications of the ACM, 34 (7), 40-61.
24. Pinsonneault, A. and K.L. Kraemar (1989), “The Impact of Technological Support on Groups: An Assessment of the Empirical Research,” Decision Support Systems, 5 (2), 197-216.
25. Selznick, P. (1957), Leadership in Administration: A sociological interpretation, New York: Harper and Row.
26. Shaw, M. (1981), Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, 3rd edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Siegel, J., V. Dubrovsky, S. Kiesler, and T.W. McGuire (1986), “Group Processes in Computer Mediated Communication,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
28. Tjosvold, Dean, Valerie Dunn, and Choy Wong (1992). “Managing Conflict Between Departments to Service Customers,” Human Relations, 45 (10), 1035-1054.
29. Tryan, Craig K., Alan R. Dennis, Douglas R. Vogel, and J.F. Nunamaker, Jr. (1992), “The Application of Electronic Meeting Technology to Support Strategic Management,” MIS Quarterly, 16 (September), 316-334.
30. Whyte, Glen (1991), “Decision Failures: Why They Occur and How to Prevent Them,” Academy of Management Executive, 5 (3), 23-31.
31. Zinkhan, George M., Erich A. Joachimsthaler, and Thomas C. Kinnear (1987), “Individual Differences and Marketing Decision Support System Usage and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (May) 208-214.