The gate-trait/contextual approach to assessment: A person-environment interactional model

Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 51-65

  Scandell, Donald J ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Gate Trait; Measurement; Self presentation; Self report

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009568097     PISSN: 10911359     EISSN: 15403556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J137v02n04_04     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Corcoran, K., & Fischer, J. (1987). Measures for clinical practice. New York: Free Press.
2. Council J.R. (1993). Context effects in personality research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 31-34.
3. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press: NY.
4. Davies, M. F. (1985). The Influence of Impression-Management Set on Measures of Self-Consciousness. Current Psychological Research and Review, 4(1), 40-45.
5. Davies, M. F. (1994). Private self-consciousness and the perceived accuracy of true and false personality feedback. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 697-701.
6. Doherty, K. & Schlenker, B. R. (1991). Self-consciousness and strategic self-presentation. Journal of Personality, 59, 1-18.
7. Fenigstein, A. (1987). On the nature of public and private self-consciousness. Journal of Personality, 55, 543-553.
8. Franzoi, S. L., Davis, M. H., & Markwiese, B. (1990). A motivational explanation for the existence of private self-consciousness differences. Journal of Personality, 58, 641-659.
9. Franklin, C. & Streeter, C. L. (1993). Validity of the 3-D circumplex model for family assessment. Research on Social Work Practice, 3, 258-275.
10. Froming, W. J., & Carver, C. S. (1981). Divergent influences of private and public self-consciousness in a compliance paradigm. Journal ofResearch in Personality, 15, 159-171.
11. Greene, G., J. Jensen, C., & Jones, D. H. (1996). A constructivist perspective on clinical social work practice with ethnically diverse clients. Social Work, 41, 172-179.
12. Hamilton, J. C., & Shuminsky, T. R. (1990). Self-awareness mediates the relationship between serial position and item reliability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1301-1307.
13. Helms J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standard cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083-1101.
14. Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51, 469-477.
15. Hudson, W. W., & Faul, A. C. (1998). Measurement issues in human behavior theory. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1, 23-32.
16. Julia, M. (1993). Developing an instrument to measure the Spanish-Speaking client’s perception of social work intervention in prenatal care. Research on Social Work Practice, 3, 329-342.
17. Knowles, E. S. (1988). Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 312-320.
18. Kroger, R. O., & Wood, L. A. (1993). Reification, “faking” and the big five. American Psychologist, 48, 1297-1298.
19. Miller, L. C., & Cox, C. L. (1982). For appearances’ sake: Public self-consciousness and makeup use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 748-751.
20. Mills, C., & Hogan, R. (1978). A role theoretical interpretation of personality scale item responses. Journal of Personality, 46, 778-785.
21. Nesler, M. S., Tedeschi, J. T., & Storr, D. M. (1995). Context effects, self-presentation and the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 273-284.
22. Osberg, T. M. (1985). Order effects in the administration of personality measures: The case of the self-consciousness scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 536-540.
23. Reichertz, D., & Frankel, H. (1993). Integrating family assessment into social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 3, 243-257.
24. Richman, J. M., Rosenfeld, L. B., & Hardy, C. J. (1993). The social support survey: A validation study of a clinical measure of the social support process. Research on Social Work Practice, 3, 288-311.
25. Scandell, D. J. & Wlazelek, B. (1996). The effects of self-presentational strategies on the NEO: Implications for detecting faking. Psychological Reports, 79, 1115-1121.
26. Scandell, D. J., & Wlazelek, B. (in press). The relationship between self-perceived personality and impression management on the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences.
27. Scheirer, M. F., Buss, A. H., & Buss, D. M. (1978). Self-consciousness, self-report of aggressiveness, and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 133-140.
28. Shrum, L. J., & McCarty, J. A. (1992). Individual differences in differentiation in the ratings of personal values: The role of private self-consciousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 223-230.
29. Steinberg, L. (1994). Context and serial order effects in personality measurement: Limits on the generality of measuring changes the measure. Journal ofPersonali-ty and Social Psychology, 66, 341-349.
30. Turner, R. G. (1978). Consistency, self-consciousness, and the predictive validity of typical and maximal personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 117-132.
31. Turner, R. G. , Gilliland, L., & Klien, H. M. (1981). Self-consciousness, evaluation of physical characteristics, and physical attractiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 182-190.