Modeling changes in salmon spawning and rearing habitat associated with river channel restoration

International Journal of River Basin Management

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 201-211

  Gard, Mark ^a  

^a U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

2D habitat modeling; Adaptive management; Fall run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha); Habitat enhancement; River restoration; Validation of habitat predictions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009563251     PISSN: 15715124     EISSN: 18142060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2006.9635289     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. California Department of Fish and Game (2001). 2000 Merced River Chinook Salmon Spawning Escapement Survey Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Fresno, CA, pp. 16.
2. California Department of Fish and Game (2003). 2002 Merced River Fall Chinook Salmon Escapement Survey. California Department of Fish and Game, Fresno, CA, pp. n.
3. Elliot, C.R.N., Willis, D.J. and Acreman, M.C. (1996). Application of the Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM) model as an assessment tool for riverine habitat restoration techniques, in M. Leclerc, H. Capra, S. Valentin, A. Boudreault and Y. Côté, (eds.), Ecohydraulics 2000.Proceedings of the Second IARH International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics,Quebec, Canada, Vol. 8, pp. 607-618.
4. Gallagher, S.P. (1999a). Experimental Comparison of Fish Habitat and Fish Use Between Channel Rehabilitation Sites and the Vegetation Encroached Channel of the Trinity River. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata, CA, pp. 69.
5. Gallagher, S.P. (1999b). Use of Two Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling to Evaluate Channel Rehabilitation in the Trinity River, California, U.S.A. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata, CA, pp. 37.
6. Gallagher, S.P. and Gard, M.F. (1999). “Relationship Between Chinook Salmon(Oncorhynchus tschawytscha)Redd Densities and PHABSIM-predicted Habitat in the Merced and Lower American Rivers, California,”Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,56, 570-577.
7. Gard, M. (1998). “Technique for Adjusting Spawning Depth Habitat Utilization Curves for Availability,”Rivers,6, 94-102.
8. Geist, D., Hunrahan, T.P., Arntzen, E.V., McMichael, G.A., Murray, C.J. and Chien, Y. (2002). “Physiochemi-cal Characteristics of the Hyporheic Zone Affect Redd Site Selection by Chum Salmon and Fall Chinook Salmon in the Columbia River,”North American Journal of Fisheries Management,22, 1077-1085.
9. Gore, J.A., Crawford, D.J. and Addison, D.S. (1996). An analysis of artificial riffles and enhancement of benthic community diversity by physical habitat simulation (PHAB-SIM) and direct observation, in M. Leclerc, H. Capra, S. Valentin, A. Boudreault and Y Côté, (eds.), Ecohydraulics 2000.Proceedings of the Second IARH International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics,Quebec, Canada, Vol. B, pp. 643-653.
10. Guay, J.C., Boisclair, D., Rioux, D., Leclerc, M., Lapointe, M. and Legendre, P. (2000). “Development and Validation of Numerical Habitat Models for Juveniles of Atlantic Salmon(Salmo salar),” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,57, 2065-2075.
11. Harby, A. and Arnekleiv, J.V. (1994). Biotope improvement analysis in the River Dalaa with the river system simulator, inProceeding's of the First International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics,Trondheim, Norway, pp. 12-30.
12. Huusko, A. and Yrjànà, T. (1996). Effects of instream enhancement structures on brown trout habitat availability in a channelized boreal river: A PHABSIM-approach, in: M. Leclerc, H. Capra, S. Valentin, A. Boudreault and Y Côté, (eds.), Ecohydraulics 2000.Proceeding's of the Second IARH International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics, Quebec, Canada, Vol. B, pp. 619-630.
13. Pasternack, G.B., Wang, C.L. and Merz, J.E. (2004). “Application of a 2D Hydrodynamic Model to Design of Reach-scale Spawning Gravel Replenishment on the Mokelumne River, California,” River Research and Applications, 20, 205-225.
14. Rubins, S.P., Bjornn, T.C. and Dennis, B. (1991). “Habitat Suitability Curves for Juvenile Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Development Using a Habitat-oriented Sampling Approach,”Rivers, 2, 12-29.
15. Shuler, S.W. and Nehring, R.B. (1993). “Using the Physical Habitat Simulation Model to Evaluate a Stream Habitat Enhancement Project,”Rivers,4, 175-193.
16. Steffler, P. and Blackburn, J. (2001). River2D: Twodimensional Depth Averaged Model of River Hydrodynamics and Fish Habitat.Introduction to Depth Averaged Modeling and User’s Manual.University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.http://bertram.civil.ualberta.ca/download. htm, pp. 120.
17. Thomas, J.A. and Bovee, K.D. (1993). “Application and Testing of a Procedure to Evaluate Transferability of Habitat Suitability Criteria,”Regulated Rivers: Research and Management,8, 285-294.
18. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2001). Merced River Salmon Habitat Enhancement Project and Robinson Reach Phase, Initial Study/environmental Assessment. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California, pp. 92.
19. Walters, C. (1986). Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources, MacMillan, New York, pp.
20. Wheaton, J.M., Pasternack, G.B. and Merz, J.E. (2004a). “Spawning Habitat Rehabilitation - I. Conceptual Approach and Methods,”International Journal of River Basin Management,2, 3-20.
21. Wheaton, J.M., Pasternack, G.B. and Merz, J.E. “Spawning Habitat Rehabilitation - II. Using Hypothesis Development and Testing in Design, Mokelumne River, California, U.S.A,”International Journal of River Basin Management,2, 21-37.
22. Wilkinson, L. (1990). SYSTAT: the System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL, pp.