Retinotopic to spatiotopic mapping in blind patients implanted with the argus II retinal prosthesis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 119-127

  Caspi, Avi ^a,b   Roy, Arup ^b   Dorn, Jessy D ^b   Greenberg, Robert J ^b  

^a JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b Second Sight Medical Products Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Retinal prosthesis; Visual implants

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROCATHETER; OPTICAL TOPOGRAPHY DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PUPIL; RETINAL IMPLANT; RETINOTOPIC MAPPING; SPATIOTOPIC MAPPING; TOPOGRAPHY; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; WAVEFORM; ATTENTION; BLINDNESS; EYE FIXATION; ORIENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TIME FACTOR; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PROSTHESIS;

ATTENTION; BLINDNESS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; SACCADES; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VISUAL PROSTHESIS;

EID: 85009470008     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-20398     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Tassicker GE. Preliminary report on a retinal stimulator. Br J Physiol Opt. 1956;13:102-105.
2. Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res. 2003;43:2573-2581.
3. Lei X, Kane S, Cogan S, et al. SiC protective coating for photovoltaic retinal prosthesis. J Neural Eng. 2016;13:046016.
4. Greenemeier L. FDA Approves First Retinal Implant. Nature News. February 15 2013. Available at:http://www.nature.com/news/fda-approves-first-retinal-implant-1.12439.
5. Sabbah N, Authié CN, Sanda N, Mohand-Said S, Sahel JA, Safran AB. Importance of eye position on spatial localization in blind subjects wearing an Argus II retinal prosthesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:8259-8266.
6. Humayun MS, Dorn JD, da Cruz L, et al. Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight’s visual prosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:779-788.
7. Zrenner E, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Benav H, et al. Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words. Proc Biol Sci. 2011;278:1489-1497.
8. Hafed ZM, Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Gekeler F, Zrenner E. Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant. Vision Res. 2016;118:119-131.
9. Lorach H, Goetz G, Smith R, et al. Photovoltaic restoration of sight with high visual acuity. Nat Med. 2015;21:476-482.
10. Pezaris JS, Reid RC. Demonstration of artificial visual percepts generated through thalamic microstimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:7670-7675.
11. Normann RA, Greger B, House P, Romero SF, Pelayo F, Fernandez E. Toward the development of a cortically based visual neuroprosthesis. J Neural Eng. 2009;6:035001.
12. Wandell BA, Dumoulin SO, Brewer AA. Visual field maps in human cortex. Neuron. 2007;56:366-383.
13. Andersen RA, Essick GK, Siegel RM. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science. 1985;230:456-458.
14. Luo G, Vargas-Martin F, Peli E. The role of peripheral vision in saccade planning: learning from people with tunnel vision. J Vis. 2008;8(14):25.
15. Ahuja AK, Behrend MR. The Argus II retinal prosthesis: factors affecting patient selection for implantation. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;36:1-23.
16. Lagarias JC, Reeds JA, Wright MH, Wright PE. Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in low dimensions. SIAM J on Optimization. 1998;9:112-147.
17. Davies DL, Bouldin DW. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1979;1:224-227.
18. Lee JW, Heo H, Park KR. A novel gaze tracking method based on the generation of virtual calibration points. Sensors (Basel). 2013;13:10802-10822.
19. Oyster CW. The Human Eye: Structure and Function. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.: 1999.
20. Bock O. Contribution of retinal versus extraretinal signals towards visual localization in goal-directed movements. Exp Brain Res. 1986;64:476-482.
21. Enright JT. The non-visual impact of eye orientation on eyehand coordination. Vision Res. 1995;35:1611-1618.
22. Henriques DYP, Klier EM, Smith MA, Lowy D, Crawford JD. Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci. 1998;18:1583-1594.
23. Nanduri D, Fine I, Horsager A, et al. Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:205-214.
24. Drasdo N, Fowler CW. Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974; 58:709-714.
25. Lewis RF, Zee DS, Hayman MR, Tamargo RJ. Oculomotor function in the rhesus monkey after deafferentation of the extraocular muscles. Exp Brain Res. 2001;141:349-358.
26. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH. Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex. Nature. 2006;444:374-377.
27. Poletti M, Listorti C, Rucci M. Stability of the visual world during eye drift. J Neurosci. 2010;30:11143-11150.
28. Peli E, Garcia-Perez MA. Motion perception during involuntary eye vibration. Exp Brain Res. 2003;149:431-438.
29. Wurtz RH, Joiner WM, Berman RA. Neuronal mechanisms for visual stability: progress and problems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:492-503.
30. Duhamel JR, Colby CL, Goldberg ME. The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science. 1992;255:90-92.
31. Poletti M, Burr DC, Rucci M. Optimal multimodal integration in spatial localization. J Neurosci. 2013;33:14259-14268.
32. Steinbach MJ. Proprioceptive knowledge of eye position. Vision Res. 1987;2:1737-1744.
33. Gauthier GM, Nommay D, Vercher JL. The role of ocular muscle proprioception in visual localization of targets. Science. 1990;249:58-61.
34. Rine RM, Skavenski AA. Extraretinal eye position signals determine perceived target location when they conflict with visual cues. Vision Res. 1997;37:775-787.
35. Balslev D, Miall RC. Eye position representation in human anterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 2008;28:8968-8972.
36. Barry MP, Dagnelie G. Hand-camera coordination varies over time in users of the Argust II retinal prosthesis system. Front Syst Neurosci. 2016;10:41.
37. Greenstein VC, Santos RA, Tsang SH, Smith RT, Barile GR, Seiple W. Preferred retinal locus in macular disease: characteristics and clinical implications. Retina. 2008;28:1234-1240.
38. Wang L, Yang L, Dagnelie G. Initiation and stability of pursuit eye movements in simulated retinal prosthesis at different implant locations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3933-3939.
39. Luo YH, Zhong JJ, Clemo M, da Cruz L. Long-term repeatability and reproducibility of phosphene characteristics in chronically implanted Argus II retinal prosthesis subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;170:100-109.
40. Ahuja AK, Yeoh J, Dorn JD, et al. Factors affecting perceptual threshold in Argus II retinal prosthesis subjects. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2013;2(4):1.
41. Wang X, Zhang M, Cohen IS, Goldberg ME. The proprioceptive representation of eye position in monkey primary somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:640-646.
42. Wurtz RH. Neuronal mechanisms of visual stability. Vision Res. 2008;48:2070-2089.
43. Burr DC, Morrone MC, Ross J. Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature. 1994;371:511-513.