Cold gas efficiency enhancement in a chemical looping combustion system using staged H2 separation approach

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 4751-4763

  Nadgouda, Sourabh G ^a   Kathe, Mandar V ^a   Fan, Liang Shih ^a  

^a Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

ASPEN plus; Cold gas efficiency; H2 production; Iron oxide based chemical looping; Reactor separator configuration; Staged H2 separation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHEMICAL EQUIPMENT; COMBUSTION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; GASES; REFORMING REACTIONS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SMALL NUCLEAR REACTORS; STEAM REFORMING;

ASPEN PLUS; CHEMICAL LOOPING; CHEMICAL-LOOPING COMBUSTION; COLD GAS EFFICIENCY; OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY; REACTOR-SEPARATOR CONFIGURATION; SEPARATION EFFICIENCY; SEPARATION TECHNOLOGIES;

SEPARATION;

EID: 85009435783     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. [1] Turner, J.A., A realizable renewable energy future. Science 285 (1999), 687–689.
2. [2] Special issue: toward a hydrogen economy. Science, 305, 2004, 957.
3. [3] Barreto, L., Makihira, A., Riahi, K., The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario. Int J Hydrogen Energy 28 (2003), 267–284.
4. [4] Bockris, J.O.M., The origin of ideas on a hydrogen economy and its solution to the decay of the environment. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27 (2002), 731–740.
5. [5] Lattin, W.C., Utgikar, V.P., Transition to hydrogen economy in the United States: a 2006 status report. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007), 3230–3237.
6. [6] Marbán, G., Valdés-Solís, T., Towards the hydrogen economy?. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007), 1625–1637.
7. [7] Board on Energy and Environmental Systems National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences National Research Council, and Washington National Academy of Engineering, The hydrogen economy: opportunities, costs, barriers, and R&D needs. 2004, The National Academies Press.
8. [8] Ramachandran, R., An overview of industrial uses of hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 23 (1998), 593–598.
9. [9] Kalamaras, C.M., Efstathiou, A.M., Hydrogen production technologies: current state and future developments. Conf Pap Energy, 2013, 9.
10. [10] Soltani, R., Rosen, M.A., Dincer, I., Assessment of CO2 capture options from various points in steam methane reforming for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014), 20266–20275.
11. [11] Van Hook, J.P., Methane-steam reforming. Catal Rev 21 (1980), 1–51.
12. [12] Muradov, N.Z., Veziroǧlu, T.N., From hydrocarbon to hydrogen-carbon to hydrogen economy. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005), 225–237.
13. [13] Rath, L., Assessment of hydrogen production with CO2 capture – volume 1: baseline state-of-the-art plants. U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/NETL-2010/1434, 2010.
14. [14] Holladay, J.D., Hu, J., King, D.L., Wang, Y., An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catal Today 139 (2009), 244–260.
15. [15] Fan, L.S., Zeng, L., Luo, S., Chemical-looping technology platform. AIChE J 61 (2015), 2–22.
16. [16] Adánez, J., Abad, A., García-Labiano, F., Gayán, P., De Diego, L.F., Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38 (2012), 215–282.
17. [17] Fan, L.S., Zeng, L., Wang, W., Luo, S., Chemical looping processes for CO2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion- prospect and opportunity. Energy Environ Sci 5 (2012), 7254–7280.
18. [18] Rydén, M., Lyngfelt, A., Using steam reforming to produce hydrogen with carbon dioxide capture by chemical-looping combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006), 1271–1283.
19. [19] Ortiz, M., Abad, A., De Diego, L.F., García-Labiano, F., Gayán, Adánez J., Hydrogen production by auto-thermal chemical-looping reforming in a pressurized fluidized bed reactor using Ni-based oxygen carriers. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010), 151–160.
20. [20] Luo, S., Zeng, L., Xu, D., Kathe, M., Chung, E., Deshpande, N., et al. Shale gas-to-syngas chemical looping process for stable shale gas conversion to high purity syngas with a H2:CO ratio of 2:1. Energy Environ Sci 7 (2014), 4104–4117.
21. [21] Rydén, M., Lyngfelt, A., Mattisson, T., Two novel approaches for hydrogen production, chemical-looping reforming and steam reforming with carbon dioxide capture by chemical-looping combustion. Fuel 85 (2006), 1631–1641.
22. [22] Ishida, M., Zheng, D., Akehata, T., Evaluation of a chemical-looping- combustion power-generation system by graphic exergy analysis. Energy 12 (1987), 147–154.
23. [23] Hossain, M.M., de Lasa, H.I., Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations-a review. Chem Eng Sci 63 (2008), 4433–4451.
24. [24] Lane, H., Process for the production of hydrogen. U. S Pat 1,078,686, 1913.
25. [25] Li, F., Zeng, L., Velazquez-Vargas, L., Yoscovits, Z., Fan, L.S., Syngas chemical looping gasification process: bench scale studies and reactor simulations. AIChE J 56 (2010), 2186–2199.
26. [26] Li, F., Kim, R., Sridhar, D., Wang, F., Zeng, L., Chen, J., et al. Syngas chemical looping gasification process: oxygen carrier particle selection and performance. Energy Fuels 23 (2009), 4182–4189.
27. [27] Li, F., Zeng, L., Fan, L.S., Biomass direct chemical looping process: process simulation. Fuel 89 (2009), 3773–3784.
28. [28] Zeng, L., Feng, H., Li, F., Fan, L.S., Coal-direct chemical looping gasification for hydrogen production: reactor modelling and process simulation. Energy Fuels 26 (2012), 3680–3690.
29. [29] Kang, K.S., Kim, C.H., Bae, K.K., Cho, W.C., Kim, S.H., Park, C.S., Oxygen-carrier selection and thermal analysis of the chemical-looping process for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010), 12246–12254.
30. [30] Tong, A., Sridhar, D., Sun, Z., Kim, H.R., Zeng, L., Wang, F., et al. Continuous high purity hydrogen generation from a syngas chemical looping 25 kWth sub-pilot unit with 100% carbon capture. Fuel 103 (2012), 495–505.
31. [31] Kathe, M.V., Empfield, A., Na, J., Blair, E., Fan, L.S., Hydrogen production from natural gas using an iron-based chemical looping technology: thermodynamic simulations and process system analysis. Appl Energy 165 (2016), 183–201.
32. [32] Fan, L.S., Chemical looping systems for fossil energy conversions. 2010, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
33. [33] Ritter, J.A., Ebner, A.D., State-of-the-Art adsorption and membrane separation processes for hydrogen production in the chemical and petrochemical industries. Sep Sci Technol 42 (2007), 1123–1193.
34. [34] Barelli, L., Bidini, G., Gallorini, F., Servili, S., Hydrogen production through sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and membrane technology: a review. Energy 33 (2008), 554–570.
35. [35] Gallucci, F., Fernandez, E., Corengia, P., van Sint Annaland, M., Recent advances on membranes and membrane reactors for hydrogen production. Chem Eng Sci 92 (2013), 40–66.
36. [36] Lu, G.Q., Diniz da Costa, J.C., Duke, M., Giessler, S., Socolow, R., Williams, R.H., et al. Inorganic membranes for hydrogen production and purification: a critical review and perspective. J Colloid Interface Sci 314 (2007), 589–603.
37. [37] Hufton, J.R., Mayorga, S., Sircar, S., Sorption-enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production. AIChE J 45 (1999), 248–256.
38. [38] Adolfo, I., Liguori, S., Jennifer, W., Angelo, B., Advances on methane steam reforming to produce hydrogen through membrane reactors technology: a review. Catal Rev 58 (2016), 1–35.
39. [39] Ritter, J.A., Ebner, A.D., Wang, J., Zidan, R., Implementing a hydrogen economy. Mater Today 6 (2003), 18–23.
40. [40] Adhikari, S., Fernando, S., Hydrogen membrane separation techniques. Ind Eng Chem Res 45 (2006), 875–881.
41. [41] Gallucci, F., van Sint Annaland, M., Kuipers, J.A.M., Theoretical comparison of packed bed and fluidized bed membrane reactors for methane reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010), 7142–7150.
42. [42] Barba, D., Giacobbe, F., De Cesaris, A., Farace, A., Iaquaniello, G., Pipino, A., Membrane reforming in converting natural gas to hydrogen (part one). Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008), 3700–3709.
43. [43] Medrano, J.A., Spallina, V., van Sint Annaland, M., Gallucci, F., Thermodynamic analysis of a membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming reactor concept for combined H2 production and CO2 capture. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014), 4725–4738.
44. [44] Abbasi, M., Farniaei, M., Rahimpour, M.R., Shariati, A., Enhancement of hydrogen production and carbon dioxide capturing in a novel methane steam reformer coupled with chemical looping combustion and assisted by hydrogen perm- selective membranes. Energy Fuels 27 (2013), 5359–5372.
45. [45] Caravella, A., Di Maio, F.P., Di Renzo, A., Optimization of membrane area and catalyst distribution in a permeative-stage membrane reactor for methane steam reforming. J Memb Sci 321 (2008), 209–221.
46. [46] Falco, M.D., Marrelli, L., Iaquaniello, G., Membrane reactors for hydrogen production processes. 2011, Springer, New York.
47. [47] Falco, M.D., Iaquaniello, G., Salladini, A., Experimental tests on steam reforming of natural gas in a reformer and membrane modules (RMM) plant. J Memb Sci 368 (2011), 264–274.
48. [48] Grol, E., Integration of H2 separation membranes with CO2 capture and compression. U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/NETL-401/113009, 2009.
49. [49] Sea, B.K., Ando, K., Kusakabe, K., Morooka, S., Separation of hydrogen from steam using a SiC-based membrane formed by chemical vapor deposition of triisopropylsilane. J Memb Sci 146 (1998), 73–82.
50. [50] Kanezashi, M., Asaeda, M., Hydrogen permeation characteristics and stability of Ni-doped silica membranes in steam at high temperature. J Memb Sci 271 (2006), 86–93.