Approximate 2D inversion of AEM data

Exploration Geophysics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 29-33

  Wolfgram, Peter ^a   Sattel, Daniel ^a   Christensen, Niels B ^b  

^a Fugro Geoteam Limited   (United States)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

2D inversion; Airborne electromagnetics; Conductivity section; Imaging

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009372725     PISSN: 08123985     EISSN: 18347533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/EG03029     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Annetts, D., Sugeng, F., and Raiche, A., 2003, Modelling and matching the airborne EM response of Harmony and Maggie Hays: 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts.
2. Christensen N.B., 1995, Imaging of central loop transient electromagnetic soundings: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, vol. 1, 53-66.
3. Christensen, N.B., 1997, Electromagnetic subsurface imaging. A case for an adaptive Born approximation: Surveys in Geophysics, 18, 477-510.
4. Christensen N.B., 2002, A generic 1-D imaging method for transient electromagnetic data: Geophysics, 67, 438-447.
5. Christiansen A.V., and Christensen N.B., 2003, A quantitative appraisal of airborne and ground-based transient electromagnetic (TEM) measurements in Denmark: Geophysics, 68, 523-534.
6. Lane, R., Green, A., Golding, C., Owers, M., Pik, P., Plunkett, C., Sattel, D., and Thorn, B., 2000, An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST AEM system: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 162-172.
7. Liu, G., and Asten, M., 1993, Conductance-depth imaging of airborne TEM data: Exploration Geophysics, 24, 655-662.
8. McGillivray, P.R., Oldenburg, D.W., Ellis, R.G., and Habashy, T.M., 1994, Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency-domain electromagnetic problem, Geophysical Journal International, 116, 1-4.
9. Macnae, J., King, A., Stolz, N., Osmakoff, A., and Blaha, A., 1998, Fast AEM processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 163-169.
10. Raiche, A., 1998, Modelling the time-domain response of AEM systems: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 103-106.
11. Sattel, D., 1998, Conductivity information in three dimensions: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 157-162.
12. Sattel D., 2002, Modelling AEM data with Zohdy's method: 72nd Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts.
13. Sattel, D., and Kgotlhang, L., 2003, Groundwater exploration with AEM in the Boteti area, Botswana: 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts.
14. Spichak, V., Menvielle, M., and Roussignol, M., 1999, Three-dimensional inversion of MT fields using Bayesian statistics: In Oristaglio, M., and Spies, B., (eds.), Three-dimensional electromagnetics: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 406-417.
15. Spies, B.R., and Eggers, D.E., 1986, The use and misuse of apparent resistivity in electromagnetic methods: Geophysics, 51, 1462-1471. (Errata in Geophysics, 53, 1637)
16. Stolz, E., 2000, Electromagnetic methods applied to exploration for deep nickel sulphides in the Leinster area, Western Australia: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 222-228.
17. Tartaras, E., Zhdanov, M., and Balch, S., 2001, Fast 3-D inversion of multi-source array electromagnetic data collected for mineral exploration: 71st Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 1439-1442.
18. Wolfgram, P., and Golden, H., 2001, Airborne EM applied to sulphide nickel - examples and analysis: Exploration Geophysics, 32, 136-140.
19. Wolfgram, P., and Karlik, G., 1995, Conductivity-depth transform of GEOTEM data: Exploration Geophysics, 26, 179-185.(discussion by Peter Wolfgram: Exploration Geophysics, 26, 549).
20. Zhdanov, M.S., and Fang, S., 1999, Three-dimensional quasi-linear electromagnetic modelling and inversion: In Oristaglio, M., and Spies, B., (ed.), Three- dimensional electromagnetics: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 233-255.