Stream hydrology and geochemistry along a rural to urban land use gradient

Applied Geochemistry

Volumn 83, Issue , 2017, Pages 136-149

  Hasenmueller, Elizabeth A ^a   Criss, Robert E ^b   Winston, William E ^b   Shaughnessy, Andrew R ^a  

^a Saint Louis University   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Flooding; Hydrograph separations; Isotope hydrology; Land use land cover; Stream chemistry; Urban streams

Indexed keywords

DISSOLVED OXYGEN; FLOODS; GEOCHEMISTRY; HYDROLOGY; ISOTOPES; LAND USE; OIL WELL FLOODING; WATER QUALITY;

GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTIC; HIGH-FREQUENCY MONITORING; HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA; LAND USE/LAND COVER; STREAM CHEMISTRY; URBAN STREAM; WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS;

RURAL AREAS;

BASEFLOW; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; FLOODING; GEOCHEMISTRY; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGY; ISOTOPIC RATIO; LAND COVER; LAND USE; LAND USE CHANGE; PEAK DISCHARGE; PRECIPITATION (CHEMISTRY); RURAL-URBAN COMPARISON; STABLE ISOTOPE; STREAM; TRIBUTARY; WATER CHEMISTRY; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 85009275203     PISSN: 08832927     EISSN: 18729134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers, River des Peres Sewage and Drainage Works. American Society of Civil Engineers Web page, 2016 http://www.asce.org/.
2. Alley, W.M., Veenhuis, J.E., Effective impervious area in urban runoff modeling. J. Hydraulic Eng. 109 (1983), 313–319.
3. Arnold, C.L. Jr., Gibbons, C.J., Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 62 (1996), 243–258.
4. Borah, D.K., Bera, M., Shaw, S., Water, sediment, nutrient, and pesticide measurements in an agricultural watershed in Illinois during storm events. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 46 (2003), 657–674.
5. Brabec, E., Schulte, S., Richards, P.L., Impervious surfaces and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. J. Plan. Literature 16 (2002), 499–514.
6. Brown, V.A., McDonnell, J.J., Burns, D.A., Kendall, C., The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow. J. Hydrol. 217 (1999), 171–190.
7. Buda, A.R., DeWalle, D.R., Dynamics of stream nitrate sources and flow pathways during stormflows on urban, forest and agricultural watersheds in central Pennsylvania, USA. Hydrol. Process. 23 (2009), 3292–3305.
8. Burns, M.J., Fletcher, T.D., Walsh, C.J., Ladson, A.R., Hatt, B.E., Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105 (2012), 230–240.
9. Buttle, J.M., Sami, K., Testing the groundwater ridging hypothesis of streamflow generation during snowmelt in a forested catchment. J. Hydrol. 135 (1992), 53–72.
10. Buttle, J.M., Vonk, A.M., Taylor, C.H., Applicability of isotopic hydrograph separation in a suburban basin during snowmelt. Hydrol. Process. 9 (1995), 197–211.
11. Corbett, K.T., Draining the metropolis: the politics of sewers in nineteenth century Saint Louis. Hurley, A., (eds.) An Environmental History of Saint Louis, 1997, Missouri Historical Society, Saint Louis, 107–125.
12. Criss, R.E., Principles of Stable Isotope Distribution. 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 254.
13. Dingman, S.L., Physical Hydrology. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA. 2002, Prentice Hall, 633.
14. Endreny, T.A., Land use and land cover effects on runoff processes: urban and suburban development. Anderson, M.G., (eds.) Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, 2005, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 1775–1804.
15. Genereux, D.P., Hooper, R.P., Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in rainfall-runoff studies. Kendall, C., McDonnell, J.J., (eds.) Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology, 1998, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 319–346.
16. Gremillion, P., Gonyeau, A., Wanielista, M., Application of alternative hydrograph separation models to detect changes in flow paths in a watershed undergoing urban development. Hydrol. Process. 14 (2000), 1485–1501.
17. Hach, Method 8206: Chloride, Mercuric Nitrate, in Digital Titrator Model 16900 Manual. 2005, Hach Company, 67–68.
18. Hach, Method 8038: Nitrogen, Ammonia: Nessler Method. 2005, Hach Company, 1–6.
19. Hach, Method 10020: Nitrate: Chromotrophic Acid Method. 2005, Hach Company, 1–4.
20. Hach, Method 8048: Phosphorus: Reactive (Orthophosphate) Method. 2005, Hach Company, 1–6.
21. Hach, Method 8190, Phosphorus: Total Digestion. 2005, Hach Company, 1–4.
22. Hasenmueller, E.A., Criss, R.E., Geochemical techniques to discover open cave passage in karst spring systems. Appl. Geochem. 29 (2013), 126–134.
23. Hasenmueller, E.A., Robinson, H.K., Hyporheic zone flow disruption from channel linings: implications for the hydrology and geochemistry of an urban stream, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. J. Earth Sci. 27 (2016), 98–109.
24. Harrison, R.W., Bedrock Geologic Map of the Saint Louis 30’ × 60’ Quadrangle, Missouri and Illinois. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigation Series Map I-2533, scale 1, 1997, 100,000.
25. Heppell, C.M., Chapman, A.S., Analysis of a two-component hydrograph separation model to predict herbicide runoff in drained soils. Agric. Water Manag. 79 (2006), 177–207.
26. Jefferson, A.J., Bell, C.D., Clinton, S.M., McMillan, S.K., Application of isotope hydrograph separation to understand contributions of stormwater control measures to urban headwater streams. Hydrol. Process. 29 (2015), 5290–5306.
27. Jennings, D.B., Jarnagin, S.T., Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: a historical perspective in a Mid-Atlantic subwatershed. Landsc. Ecol. 17 (2002), 471–489.
28. Kaushal, S.S., Groffman, P.M., Likens, G.E., Belt, K.T., Stack, W.P., Kelly, V.R., Band, L.E., Fisher, G.T., Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 (2005), 13517–13520.
29. Kaushal, S.S., McDowell, W.H., Wollheim, W.M., Johnson, T.A.N., Mayar, P.M., Belt, K.T., Pennino, M.J., Urban evolution: the role of water. Water 7 (2015), 4063–4087.
30. Klaus, J., McDonnell, J.J., Hydrograph separation using stable isotopes: review and evaluation. J. Hydrol. 505 (2013), 47–64.
31. Konrad, C.P., Effects of Urban Development on Floods. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-076–03, 2003, 1–4.
32. Lee, J.G., Heaney, J.P., Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 129 (2003), 419–426.
33. Loperfido, J.V., Noe, G.B., Jarnagin, S.T., Hogan, D.M., Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale. J. Hydrol. 519 (2014), 2584–2595.
34. Lutzen, E.E., Rockaway, J.D. Jr., Engineering Geologic Map of Saint Louis County, Missouri. 1989, Missouri Department of Natural Resources Open File Mapp. 89–256-EG.
35. Marchi, L., Borga, M., Preciso, E., Gaume, E., Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management. J. Hydrol. 394 (2010), 118–133.
36. Metropolitan Saint Louis Sewer District MSD, Metropolitan Saint Louis Sewer District. Metropolitan Saint Louis Sewer District Web page, 2016 http://www.stlmsd.com/home.
37. Meriano, M., Howard, K.W., Eyles, N., The role of midsummer urban aquifer recharge in stormflow generation using isotopic and chemical hydrograph separation techniques. J. Hydrol. 396 (2011), 82–93.
38. Missouri Department of Conservation MDC, LaBarque Creek Watershed: Conservation Opportunity Area. Missouri Department of Conservation Web page, 2005 http://mdc.mo.gov/.
39. Missouri Department of Natural Resources MoDNR, Missouri Water Quality: Missouri's 303(d) Streams and Lakes. Missouri Department of Natural Resources Web page, 2016 http://dnr.mo.gov/env/wpp/waterquality/303d/303d.htm.
40. Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium MRLC, National Land Cover Database 2006 (NLCD2006). NLCD2006 Web page, 2016 http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd06_data.php.
41. Muñoz-Villers, L.E., McDonnell, J.J., Runoff generation in a steep, tropical montane cloud forest catchment on permeable volcanic substrate. Water Resour. Res., 48, 2012, W09528.
42. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA, National Weather Service (NWS) Weather. NWS Web page, 2016 http://www.weather.gov/.
43. O'Driscoll, M., Clinton, S., Jefferson, A., Manda, A., McMillan, S., Urbanization effects on watershed hydrology and in-stream processes in the southern United States. Water 2 (2010), 605–648.
44. Ogden, F.L., Sharif, H.O., Senarath, S.U.S., Smith, J.A., Baeck, M.L., Richardson, J.R., Hydrologic analysis of the Fort Collins, Colorado, flash flood of 1997. J. Hydrol. 228 (2000), 82–100.
45. Pellerin, B.A., Wollheim, W.M., Feng, X., Vörösmarty, C.J., The application of electrical conductivity as a tracer for hydrograph separation in urban catchments. Hydrol. Process. 22 (2008), 1810–1818.
46. Renshaw, C.E., Feng, X.H., Sinclair, K.J., Dums, R.H., The use of stream flow routing for direct channel precipitation with isotopically-based hydrograph separations: the role of new water in stormflow generation. J. Hydrol. 273 (2003), 205–216.
47. Shock, E.L., Carbery, K., Noblit, N., Schnall, B., Kogan, P., Rovito, S., Berg, A., Liang, J., Water and solute sources in an urban stream, River des Peres, Saint Louis, Missouri. Criss, R.E., Wilson, D.A., (eds.) At the Confluence: Rivers, Floods, and Water Quality in the Saint Louis Region, 2003, Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Saint Louis, 150–160.
48. Sklash, M.G., Farvolden, R.N., The role of groundwater in storm runoff. J. Hydrol. 43 (1979), 45–65.
49. Sklash, M.G., Stewart, M.K., Pearce, A.J., Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments: 2. A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response. Water Resour. Res. 22 (1986), 1273–1282.
50. Stueber, A.M., Criss, R.E., Origin and transport of dissolved chemicals in a karst watershed, southwestern Illinois. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 41 (2005), 267–290.
51. U.S. Geological Survey USGS, USGS Current Water Data for Missouri. National Water Information System. Web Interface Web page, 2016 http://waterdata.usgs.gov/mo/nwis/rt.
52. Vicars-Groening, J., Williams, H.F.L., Impact of urbanization on storm response of White Rock Creek, Dallas, TX. Environ. Geol. 51 (2007), 1,263–1,269.
53. Walsh, C.J., Roy, A.H., Feminella, J.W., Cottingham, P.D., Groffman, P.M., Morgan, R.P. II, The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 24 (2005), 706–723.
54. Winston, W.E., Dynamic Response of an Eastern Missouri Karst Spring to Seasonal and Storm Induced Perturbations. [Masters thesis], 2001, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, 225.
55. Winston, W.E., Criss, R.E., Dynamic hydrologic and geochemical response in a perennial karst spring. Water Resour. Res., 40, 2004, W05106.