Feature-based analysis of mouse prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in histological tissue sections

Journal of Pathology Informatics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Ruusuvuori, Pekka ^a,b   Valkonen, Mira ^a   Nykter, Matti ^a   Visakorpi, Tapio ^a,c   Latonen, Leena ^a,c  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^c TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Histopathological image analysis; machine learning; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009266679     PISSN: 22295089     EISSN: 21533539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.175378     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Stewart BW, Wild CP, editors. IACR World Cancer Report 2014. Lyon, France: WHO Press; 2014.
2. Tomlins SA, Rubin MA, Chinnaiyan AM. Integrative biology of prostate cancer progression. Annu Rev Pathol 2006;1:243-71.
3. Merrimen JL, Evans AJ, Srigley JR. Preneoplasia in the prostate gland with emphasis on high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Pathology 2013;45:251-63.
4. Shappell SB, Thomas GV, Roberts RL, Herbert R, Ittmann MM, Rubin MA, et al. Prostate pathology of genetically engineered mice: Definitions and classification. The consensus report from the Bar Harbor meeting of the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium Prostate Pathology Committee. Cancer Res 2004;64:2270-305.
5. Di Cristofano A, Pesce B, Cordon-Cardo C, Pandolfi PP. Pten is essential for embryonic development and tumour suppression. Nat Genet 1998;19:348-55.
6. Ghaznavi F, Evans A, Madabhushi A, Feldman M. Digital imaging in pathology: Whole-slide imaging and beyond. Annu Rev Pathol 2013;8:331-59.
7. Hamilton PW, Bankhead P, Wang Y, Hutchinson R, Kieran D, McArt DG, et al. Digital pathology and image analysis in tissue biomarker research. Methods 2014;70:59-73.
8. Veta M, Pluim JP, van Diest PJ, Viergever MA. Breast cancer histopathology image analysis: A review. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014;61:1400-11.
9. Tuominen VJ, Isola J. Linking whole-slide microscope images with DiCOM by using JPEG2000 interactive protocol. J Digit Imaging 2010;23:454-62.
10. Park JH, Walls JE, Galvez JJ, Kim M, Abate-Shen C, Shen MM, et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in genetically engineered mice. Am J Pathol 2002;161:727-35.
11. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to imagej: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9:671-5.
12. Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Mäenpää T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2002;24:971-87.
13. Pietikäinen M, Ojala T, Xu Z. Rotation-invariant texture classification using feature distributions. Pattern Recognit 2000;33:43-52.
14. Ludwig O, Delgado D, Goncalves V, Nunes U. Trainable Classifier-fusion Schemes: An Application to Pedestrian Detection. Vol. 1. In: 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2009. p. 432-7.
15. Dalal N, Triggs B. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Vol. 1. 2005. p. 886-93.
16. Matas J, Chum O, Urban M, Pajdla T. Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. Image Vis Comput Puting 2004;22:761-7.
17. Vedaldi A, Fulkerson B. VLFeat: An Open and Portable Library of Computer Vision Algorithms; 2008. Available from: http://www.vlfeat.org/. [Last accessed on 2016 Jan 16].
18. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc 1996;58:267-88.
19. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 2010;33:1-22.
20. Iczkowski KA, Lucia MS. Current perspectives on Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2011;12:216-22.
21. Ruusuvuori P, Lin J, Scott AC, Tan Z, Sorsa S, Kallio A, et al. Quantitative analysis of colony morphology in yeast. Biotechniques 2014;56:18-27.