Anonymous biomedical publications for security reason? An open letter to the ICJME

European Journal of Internal Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue , 2017, Pages e15-

  Charlier, P ^a,b,c   Deo, S ^a   Herve C ^b,c  

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^b CASH and IPES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANONYMISED DATA; IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION; LETTER; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLICY; PUBLISHING; WRITING; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS; HUMAN; PUBLICATION; PUNISHMENT;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUNISHMENT;

EID: 85009233022     PISSN: 09536205     EISSN: 18790828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.01.006     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobranszki, J., Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Sci Eng Ethics 22:5 (2016), 1457–1472.
2. ICJME, Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. 2015 [http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf].
3. Lennane, J., What happens to whistleblowers, and why?. Social Med 6:4 (2012), 249–258.
4. Charlier, P., Deo, S., Mamzer-Bruneel, M.F., Hervé, C., Ethical limits to biomedical publications?. Eur J Intern Med 33 (2016), e30–e31.