Signal and feature compensation methods for robust speech recognition

Noise Reduction in Speech Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 219-244

  Singh, Rita ^a   Stern, Richard M ^b   Raj, Bhiksha ^c  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009217371     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G., Pattern Classification, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
2. Jelinek, F., Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
3. Juang, B.H., Levinson, S.E., and Sondhi, M.M., Maximum likelihood estimation for multivariate mixture observations of Markov chains, IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, IT-32(2), 1986, 307–309.
4. Davis, S.B. and Mermelstein, P., Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Proc., ASSP-28, 4, 357–366, 1980.
5. Raj, B., Reconstruction of Incomplete Spectrograms for Robust Speech Recognition, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2000.
6. Boll, S.F., Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Proc., ASSP-27, 2, 113–120, 1979.
7. Lockwood, P. and Boudy, J., Experiments with a nonlinear spectral subtractor (NSS), hidden Markov models and the projection, for robust speech recognition in cars, Speech Commun., 11, 215–228, 1992.
8. Lim, J.S. and Oppenheim, A.V., All-pole modeling of degraded speech, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Proc., ASSP-26, 3, 197–210, 1978.
9. Acero, A., Acoustic and Environmental Robustness in Automatic Speech Recognition, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990.
10. Berouti, M., Schwartz, R., and Makhoul, J., Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise, Proc. ICASSP79, 1979, 215–228.
11. Moreno, P.J., Speech Recognition in Noisy Environments, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
12. Neumeyer, L. and Weintraub, M., Probabilistic optimum filtering for robust speech recognition, Proc. ICASSP94, 1994, 417–420.
13. Kim, N.S., IMM-based estimation for slowly evolving environments, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 5(6), 146–149, 1998.
14. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B., Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion), J. Royal Stat. Soc., Series B, 39, 1–38, 1977.
15. Hermansky, H. and Morgan, N., RASTA processing of speech, IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing, 2, 578–589, 1994.
16. Morgan, N. and Hermansky, H., RASTA extensions: robustness to additive and convolutional noise, Proc. ESCA Workshop on Speech Processing in Adverse Conditions, 1992, 115–118.
17. Ephraim, Y., A minimum mean square error approach for speech enhancement, Proc. IEEE Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1990, 829–832.
18. Beattie, V.L., Hidden Markov Model State-Based Noise Compensation, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, U.K., 1992.
19. Ephraim, Y. and Van Trees, H.L., A signal subspace approach for speech enhancement, IEEE Trans. Speech, Audio Processing, 3, 251–266, 1995.
20. Mansour, D. and Juang, B.H., A family of distortion measures based upon projection operation for robust speech recognition, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Proc., ASSP-37, 1989, 1659–1671.
21. Gong, Y., Speech recognition in noisy environments: a survey, Speech Commun., 16, 261–291, 1995.
22. Huang, X., Acero, A., and Hon, H.W., Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2001.
23. Junqua, J., Robustness in Automatic Speech Recognition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1995.