Measuring the readability of automatic speech-to-text transcripts

EUROSPEECH 2003 - 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1585-1588

  Jones, Douglas ^b   Wolf, Florian ^a   Gibson, Edward ^a   Williams, Elliott ^a   Fedorenko, Evelina ^a   Reynolds, Douglas ^b   Zissman, Marc ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION;

AUTOMATIC SPEECH-TO-TEXT TRANSCRIPTS; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; FIGURE OF MERITS; NOCV1; QUESTION ANSWERING; SPEECH TRANSCRIPTS; SUBJECTIVE RATING;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 85009168601     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Wayne, C., Effective, Affordable, Reusable Speech-to- Text (EARS). Official web site for DARPA/EARS Program. http://www.darpa.mil/iao/EARS.htm. 2003.
2. Strassel, S., Guidelines for RT-03 Transcription - Version 2.2. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania. Manuscript. February 23, 2003
3. Martin, A, and M. Przybocki. "The NIST 1999 Speaker Recognition Evaluation - An Overview". Digital Signal Processing, 10, 1-18. 2000.
4. Fiscus, J., Speech Recognition Scoring Toolkit (SCTK) Version 1.2c http://www.nist.gov/speech/tools. 2000.
5. Kintsch, W., Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1998.
6. Garofolo, J., Rich Transcript Spring 2003 BenchmarkTests. http://www.nist.gov/speech/tests/rt/rt2003