The relative impact of brief treatment versus brief intervention in primary health-care screening programs for substance use disorders

Addiction

Volumn 112, Issue , 2017, Pages 54-64

  Aldridge, Arnie ^a   Dowd, William ^a   Bray, Jeremy ^b  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Brief intervention; brief therapy; brief treatment; illicit drugs; propensity score; quasi experimental; SBI; SBIRT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL INTOXICATION; CANNABIS USE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PROPENSITY SCORE; SHORT TERM PSYCHOTHERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARIJUANA USE; MASS SCREENING; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROPENSITY SCORE; PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85008978612     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/add.13653     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Moyer A., Finney J. W., Swearingen C. E., Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction 2002; 97: 279–292.
2. Krupski A., Sears J. M., Joesch J. M., Estee S., He L., Dunn C. et al. Impact of brief interventions and brief treatment on admissions to chemical dependency treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010; 110: 126–136.
3. Stephens R. S., Roffman R. A., Curtin L. Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68: 898.
4. Madras B. K., Compton W. M., Avula D., Stegbauer T., Stein J. B., Clark H. W. Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: comparison at intake and 6 months later. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 99: 280–295.
5. Bernstein E., Bernstein J. A., Stein J. B., Saitz R. SBIRT in emergency care settings: are we ready to take it to scale. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16: 1072–1077.
6. Kaner, E. F., Beyer, F., Dickinson, H. O., Pienaar E., Campbell F., Schlesinger C. et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004148. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub3.
7. Dehejia R. H., Wahba S. Causal effects in non-experimental studies: re-evaluating the evaluation of training programs. J Am Assoc 1998; 94: 1.053–1.062.
8. Johnson M. L., Crown W., Martin B. C., Dormuth C. R., Siebert U. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: analytic methods to improve causal inference from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part III. Value Health 2009; 12: 1062.
9. Miller W. R. Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behav Psychother 1983; 11: 147–172.
10. Miller W. R., Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 1991.
11. Bien T. H., Miller W. R., Tonigan J. S. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction 1993; 88: 315.
12. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Helping patients who drink too much: a clinician's guide. Updated 2005 edn. NIH Publication no. 07-3769. Rockville, MD: Author; 2007.
13. Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C. Toward a comprehensive model of change. In: R. M. W., N. H., editors. Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change. New York: Plenum Press; 1986, pp. 3–27.
14. Rosenbaum, P. R., Rubin, D. B. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 1984; 79: 516–524.
15. Rubin D. B. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 1974; 66: 688.
16. Caliendo M., Kopeinig S. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv 2008; 22: 31–72.
17. Ho D. E., Imai K., King G., Stuart E. A. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit Anal 2007; 15: 199–236.
18. Austin P. C. Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research. Commun Stat Stim Comput 2009; 38: 1228–1234.
19. Baser O. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health 2006; 9: 377–385.
20. Heckman J. J., Ichimura H., Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud 1998; 65: 261–294.
21. A. S. J., Todd P. E. Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? J Econometr 2005; 125: 305–353.
22. Leuven, E., Sianesi, B. PSMATCH2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing. Boston College of Econonmetrics; Statistical Software Components: 2003.
23. Babor T. F. Brief treatments for cannabis dependence: findings from a randomized multisite trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72: 455.