Delivering the promise of academic success through late intervention

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 101-117

  Neal, Judith C ^a   Kelly, Patricia R ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008857612     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10573560252808503     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allington, R, L. (1995). Literacy lessons in the elementary schools: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, hr R. L. Allington & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
2. Allington, R. L., & Walmsley, S. A. (1995). No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
3. Askew, B. J., & Frasier, D. F. (1994). Sustained effects of Reading Recovery inteivention on the cognitive behaviors of second grade children and the perceptions of their teachers. Literacy, Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 1, 87-108.
4. Brown, W, Denton, E., Kelly, R R., & Neal, J. C. (1999). Reading Recovery effectiveness: A five-year success story in San Luis Coastal Unified School District. ERS Spectrum, Journal of School Research and Information, 17, 3-12.
5. California Department of Education. (1995). Every child a reader: The report of the California Reading Task Force. Sacramento, CA: CDE.
6. Clay, M. M. (1991a). Becoming litera te: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Clay, M. M. (1991b). Reading Recovery surprises, hi D. E. DeFord, C. A. Lyons, &G. S. Pinnell (Eds.), Bridges to literacy: Learning from Reading Recovery (pp. 55-74). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. Clay, M. M. (1993a). Introduction In Lyons, C. A., Pinnell, G. S., & DeFord, D. E. (Eds.), Partners in learning: Teachers and children in Reading Recovery (pp. xiii-xiv). New York, NY: Teacher College Press, Columbia University.
9. Clay, M. M. (1993b). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Cunningham, P. M. (1995). Phonics they use: Words for reading and writing. New' York, NY: HarperCollins.
11. Dyer, P. C., & Binkney, R. (1995). Estimating cost-effect ivness and educational outcomes: Retention, remediation, special education, and early intervention. In R. L. Allington & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp. 61-77). New York, NY: Columbia University Teachers College Press.
12. Heckleman, R. G. (1969). A neurological impress method of remedial-leading instruction. Academic Therapy, 4, 277-281.
13. Hiebert, E. H., & Taylor, B. M. (1994). Getting reading right from the start: Effective early literacy interventions. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Keene, E. O., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Kelly, P. R. (1995). Round robin reading: Considering alternative instructional practices that make more sense. Reading Horizons, 36 (2), 99-115.
16. Kelly, P. R., & Neal, J. C. (1996). The efficacy of Reading Recovery as an early intervention for at-risk English language learners and Spanish-speaking children. Paper presented to the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.
17. Koskinen, P., & Blum, I. (1986). Paired repeated reading: A classroom strategy for developing fluent reading. The Reading Teacher, 40, 70-75.
18. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 191-218.
19. Lee, N. G., & Neal, J. C. (1992-1993). Reading Rescue: Case study of intensive intervention for an "at promise" middle school student. Journal of Reading, 36, 227-230.
20. Nathan, R. G., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). The causes and consequences of differences in reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30, 176-184.
21. Neal, J. C. (1995). Interventions to accelerate early literacy development: State-of-the art report on school-based programs. Paper presented to the California Reading Association, Anaheim, CA.
22. Neal, J. C., & Kelly, P. R, (1999). The success of Reading Recovery for English language learners and Descubriendo La Lectura for bilingual students in California. Literacy Teach ing and Learning: An Interna tional Journal of Early Read ing and Writing, 4, 81-108.
23. Ohlhausen, M. M., & Jepsen, M. (1992). Lessons for Goldilocks: Somebody's been choosing my books but I can make my own choices now. The New Advocate, 5, 31-46.
24. Pikulski, J. J. (1994). Preventing reading failure: A review of five effective programs. The Reading Teacher, 48, 30-38.
25. Rasinski, T. V. (1988). Making repeated readings a functional part of classroom reading instruction. Reading Horizons, 28, 250-254.
26. Rhodes, L. (1981). I can read! Predictable books as resources for reading and writing instruction. The Reading Teacher, 34, 511-518.
27. Roller, C. M., & Fielding, L. G. (1996). Choice makes reading instruction child centered. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Variability not disability (pp. 43-55). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
28. Roller, C., Beed, P. L., & Forsyth, S. (1996). Direct instruction occurs in context. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Variability, not disability (pp. 69-83). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
29. Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 107-121.
30. Scieszka, J. (1989). The true story of the three little pigs. New York NY: Viking Penguin.
31. Slavin, R. E., & Wasik, B. A. (1993). Preventing early school failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 178-200.
32. Southern Regional Education Board. (1994). Getting schools ready for children: The other side of the readiness goal. Atlanta, GA: SREB.
33. Spiegel, D. L. (1995). A comparison of traditional remedial programs and Reading Recovery: Guidelines for success for all programs. The Reading Teacher, 49, 86-96.
34. Stanovic-h, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
35. Stanovic-h, K. E. (1993-1994). Romance and reality. The Read ing Teacher, 47, 280-291.
36. Tharpe, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Wood, D., Burner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry; 17, 89-100.