Reading response-ably: Ethnography and prudential caring

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 161-164

  Lincoln, Yvonna S ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008843384     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095183997237241     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
2. Cronbach, L. J. (1980). Validity on parole: can we go straight? New Directions for Testingand Measurement, 5, 116-127.
3. Eisenhart, M. A., & Howe, K. R. (1992). Validity in educational research. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 643-680). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Firestone, W. (1987). Meaning in method: the rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 16, 16-21.
5. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Lather, P. (1986a). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: between a rock and a hard place. Interchange, 17 (4), 63-84.
7. Lather, P. (1986b, April). Issues of data trustworthinessin openly ideological research. Paper presented at the annual meeting, American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
8. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
9. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34 (4), 673-693.
10. Lather, P. (in press). Validity as an incitement to discourse. In V. Richards, (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 4th ed. Washington, American Educational Research Association.
11. LeCompte, M. D., Millroy, W. L., & Preissle, J. (Eds.). (1992). The handbook of qualitative research in education San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1 (3), 275-289.
13. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking ± and rejecting ± validity in qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: the continuing debate (pp. 121-151). New York: Teachers College Press.