Psychoanalytic theory and diverse populations: Reflections on old practices and new understandings

Psychoanalytic Social Work

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 61-70

  Bonner, Carol E ^a  

^a SIMMONS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross cultural work; Diverse populations; Graduate training in social work; Leadership; Psychoanalytic training

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008834179     PISSN: 15228878     EISSN: 15229033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J032v09n02_07     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Atwood, G., & Stolorow, R. D. (1984). Structures of subjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
2. Berzoff, J., Flanagan, L. M., & Hertz, P. (Eds.). (1996). Inside out and outside in. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
3. Bowles, D. (1999). Intersubjectivity: Expanding our understanding of the worker-cli-ent relationship. Smith College Studies in Social Work,69(2), 359-369.
4. Comas-Diaz, L., & Jacobson, F. M. (1991). Ethnocultural transference and countertransference in the therapeutic dyad. American Orthopsychiatric Association, Inc.,61(3), 392-402.
5. Goldberg, E. et al. (1974). Some observations on three interracial analyses. International Journal of Psychoanalysis,55(495-500).
6. Holmes, D. E. (1992). Race and transference in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 73(1), 1-11.
7. Leary, K. (2000). Racial enactments in dynamic treatment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 10(4), 639-653.
8. Perez-Foster, R. (1999). An intersubjective approach to cross-cultural clinical work. Smith College Studies in Social Work,69(2), 269-291.
9. Schachter, J., & Butts, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference in interracial analyses. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 16, 792-808.
10. Stolorow, R. D., Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, G. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach.Hillside, NJ: Analytic Press.