Educator attitudes toward electronic grading software

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 193-212

  Migliorino, Nicholas J ^a   Maiden, Jeffrey ^b  

^a Division of Pulmonary Medicine Department of Medicine Tahlequah City Hospital   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Electronic grading

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008828867     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782412     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Applebaum, S. H. (1990) Computer phobia: Training manager to reduce fears & love the machines. Industrial & Commercial Training, 22(6), 9-16.
2. Baack, S., Brown, T., & Brown, J. (1991). Attitudes toward computers: Views of older adults compared with those of younger adults. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(3), 422-433.
3. Brush, T. A., Armstrong, J., Barbrow, D., & Ulintz, L. (1999). Design and delivery of integrated learning systems: Their impact on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service No. EJ 606 782)
4. Carey, D. M. (1985). An investigation of factors that affect elementary school teachers’ educational use of computers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
5. Condit, D. G. (1985). A comparison of school counselors attitudes toward computers in general and toward computers used in the counseling profession. Doctoral dissertation, East Texas State University.
6. Cote, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (2000). Attitude versus aptitude: Is intelligence or motivation more important for positive higher-education outcomes? Journal of Adolescent Research. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service No. EJ 599 988)
7. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, New York: SAGE Publications.
8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P, & Warasaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 983-1003.
9. Donoho, R. (1994). Terminal illness. Successful Meetings, 43(3), 46-51.
10. Friedman, S. J., Valde, G. A., Obermeyer, B. J. (1998). Computerized report card comment menus: Teacher use and teacher parent perceptions. ERS Spectrum. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service No. EJ 567 340)
11. George, G., & Sleeth, R. G. (1996). Technology assisted instruction and instructor cyberphobia: Recognizing the ways to effect change. Education, 116(A), 604.
12. Gettys, C. M., & Fowler, F. (1996). The relationship of academic and recreational reading attitudes school wide: A beginning study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402 568)
13. Ghomita, V. (1997). The adoption of microcomputers for instructors: Implications for emergency instructional media in implementation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 2.
14. Gressard, C., & Loyd, B. H. (1984). The effects of sex, age, and computer experience on computer attitudes. AEDS Journal, 18(2), 61-11.
15. Gressard, C., & Loyd, B. H. (1985). Validation studies of a new computer attitude scale. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 264 297)
16. Hall, R. W., Butler, L. G., Kestner, N. R., & Limbach, P. A. (1999). Combining feedback and assessment via web-based homework. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 16(1), 24-26.
17. Harris, P. H. (1985). Future work II. Personnel Journal, 64(J), 52-57.
18. Hayes, B. G., & Robinson, E. H. (2000). Assessing counselor education students’ attitudes toward computers and multimedia instruction. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service No. EJ 607 760).
19. Henry, J. W., & Stone, R. W. (1997). The development and validation of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales in a non-volitional context. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(4), 519-527.
20. Hogan, K. (1994). Technophobia [Magazine supplement]. Forbes, February 28,116.
21. Jorde, P. (1985). Microcomputers in early childhood education: Factors influencing administrators innovation-adoption decisions. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 255 324)
22. Kim, J. S. (2000). Students’ attitudes and perceptions toward technology. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.
23. Koohang, A. A. (1987). Computerphobia: An empirical study. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service, EJ 306 948)
24. Koohang, A. A. (1989). Effects of age, gender college status, and computer experience on attitudes toward library computer systems (LCS). Library and Information Science Research, 8(4), 349-353. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service, EJ 349 581)
25. Li, P. (1998). Grading the electronic way. Technology & Learning 19(2), 62.
26. Liaw, S. S. (2000). Information technology and education: Student perceptions of computer and web-based environments. Doctoral dissertation, Seattle Pacific University.
27. Maher, T. M. (1994). Secondary principals computer experience, training, and attitudes. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.
28. McFarlane, T. A. (1997, March). Teacher’s attitudes toward technology:psychometric evaluation of the technology attitude survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 411 279).
29. McKinnon, D. H, Nolan, C. J., & Sinclair, K. E. (2000). A longitudinal study of student attitudes toward computers: Resolving an attitude decay paradox. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3), 325-335. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service No. EJ 605 312)
30. Migliorino, N. J. (2000). Computer generated grading: Is it more effective-efficient. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oklahoma.
31. Pina, A. A., & Harris, B. R. (1993). Increasing teachers’ confidence in using computers for education. _(ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 365 648).
32. Reece, M. J., & Gable, R. K. (1982). The development and validation of measure of general attitudes towards computers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(3), 913-916.
33. Reed, D. E. (1996). High school teachers’ grading practices: A description of methods for collection and aggregation of grade information in three schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of California Riverside
34. Roblyer, M. D., Edwards, J., & Havrileck, M. A. (1999). Integrating Educational Technology into teaching (pp. 163-164). Upper Saddle River, NJ & Columbus, OH: Merrill, an imprint of Prentice Hall.
35. Rowntree, D. (1987). Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Kogan Page. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.
36. Ruggiero, V. R. (1998). Changing attitudes: A strategy for motivating students to learn. (Report No. 0-205-26972-9). New Jersey (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 422 336).
37. Spring, J. (2001). American Education 1 ff” Ed. McGraw-Hill Online Learning Center. Retrieved November 24, 2001, from: http://highered.mcgrawhill.com/sites/0072397810/student_view0/chapter1/chapter_outline.html.
38. Steward, H. R. (1990). A study of the attitudes of southeast Texas elementary principals and teachers toward the microcomputer. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
39. Terwilliger, J. S. (1971). Assigning grades to students. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
40. Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Bantam Books.