Teachers’ emotions and test feedback

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 341-361

  Stough, Laura M ^a   Emmer, Edmund T ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008814946     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095183998236809     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A.,& Morgan, M. (1991). The instructionaleffect offeedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
2. Bender, T. A., & Standage, T. H. (1992, April). Influences onstudents’ uses of classroom examination feedback.Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
3. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
4. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review ofEducational Research, 58(4), 438-481.
5. Erber, R., Wegner, D. M., & Therriault, N. (1996). On being cool and collected: Mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. J ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 757-766.
6. Gagne, E. D., Cruttcher, R. J., Anzelc, J., Geisman, C., Hoffman, V. D., Schutz, P., & Lizcano, L. (1987). The role of student processing of feedback in classroom achievement. Cognition and Instruction, 4(3), 167-186.
7. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.Chicago: Aldine.
8. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, J., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. J ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 820-835.
9. Jacob, E. (1987). Qualitative research tradition: A review. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 1-50.
10. Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 279-308.
11. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79-97.
12. Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124-129.
13. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46(4), 352-367.
14. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: a history ofchanging outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1-21.
15. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping.New York: Springer.
16. McGinn, M. K., & Winne, P. H. (1994, April). Moving from products to processes: A review of feedback in mathematics education.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
17. Mory, E. H. (1992 April). T he use of response certitude on adaptive feedback: Effects of student performance, feedback study time, and efficiency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
18. Pridemore, D. R., & Klein, J. K. (1992 April). Response pattern analysis of computer-based instruction with learner control of feedback. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
19. Reisenzein, R., & Spielhofer, C. (1994). Subjectively salient dimensions of emotional appraisal. Motivation and Emotion, 18(1), 31-77.
20. Sarason, I. G. (1980). Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. J ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 929-938.
22. Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8-11.
23. Stough, L. M. (1993, January). T eachers’ emotions and test feedback. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX
24. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Webb, J. M., Stock, W. A.,& McCarthy, M. T. (1994). The effects of feedback timing on learning facts: The role of response confidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(3), 251-265.
26. Weinstein, C. E., Cubberly, W. E., & Richardson, F. C. (1982). The effects of test anxiety on learning at superficial and deep levels of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology,7 (1), 107-112.
27. Wine, J. (1980). Cognitive-attentional theory of test anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 349-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Wine, J. (1982). Evaluation anxiety: A cognitive-attentional construct. In H. W. Krohne & L. Laux (Eds.), Series in clinical and community psychology. Achievement, stress, and anxiety (pp. 207-219). Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.
29. You, L., & Schallert, D. L. (1992, April).T he role of affect in learning from classroom discourse.Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.