The participation of a student identified as learning disabled in a regular education book club: The case of stark

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 195-214

  Goatley, Virginia J ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008814583     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1057356960120206     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allington, R. L. (1991). The legacy of “slow it down and make it more concrete.” In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors I teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction. Fortieth yearbook of the National Read-ing Conference (pp. 19-29). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
2. Babbitt, N. (1975). Tuck everlasting. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
3. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bruffee, K. (1984). Peer tutoring and the “conversation of mankind.” College English, 46, 635-652.
5. Cullinan, B. E. (1987). Children's literature in the reading program. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
6. Cullinan, D., Sabomie, E. J., & Crossland, C. L. (1992). Social mainstreaming for mildly handicapped students. Elementary School Journal, 92, 339-352.
7. Dahl, R. (1961). James and the giant peach. New York: Puffin Books.
8. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., & Mariage, T. (1994). Developing a school-based discourse for literacy learning: A principled search for understanding. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 2-32.
9. Gilles, C. (1990). Collaborative literacy strategies: “We don’t need a circle to have a group.” In K. G. Short & K. M. Pierce (Eds.), Talking about books: Creating literature communities (pp. 55-68). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Goatley, V J., & Raphael, T. E. (1992). Non-traditional learners’ written and dialogic response to literature. In C. K. Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory and practice: Views from many perspectives. Forty-First yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 312-322). Chicago: Na-tional Reading Conference.
11. Goatley, V. J., Brock, C., & Raphael, T. E. (1995). Diverse learners participat-ing in regular education book clubs. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 352-380.
12. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York: Tavistock Publications.
13. Johnston, P., & Allington, R. (1991). Remediation. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 984-1012). New York: Longman.
14. McMahon, S. I. (1992). A group of five students as they participate in their student-led book club. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
15. McMahon, S. I., & Raphael, T. E. (1993). Literature and the reading program: Why and how? Michigan Reading Journal, 26(3), 28-39.
16. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative ap-proach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17. O’Dell, S. (1960). Island of the blue dolphins. New York: Dell.
18. Paterson, K. (1977). Bridge to Terabithia. New York: Avon Books.
19. Paterson, K. (1988). Park's quest. New York: Avon Books.
20. Paulsen, G. (1987). Hatchet. New York: Puffin Books.
21. Pearson, P. D. (1994). Integrated language arts: Sources of controversy and seeds of consensus. In L. M. Morrow, J. K. Smith, & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Integrated language arts: Controversy to consensus (pp. 11-31). Boston: Al-lyn & Bacon.
22. Raphael, T. E., & Goatley, V. J. (1994). The teacher as “more knowledgeable other”: Changing roles for teachers in alternative reading instruction pro-grams. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice. Forty-Third Yearbook of the National Read-ing Conference (pp. 527-536). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
23. Raphael, T. E., & McMahon, S. I. (1994). “Book Club”: An alternative frame-work for reading instruction. Reading Teacher, 48, 102-116.
24. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1991). Literature-S.O.S.! Language Arts, 68, 444-448.
25. Roser, N., & Martinez, M. (1995). Book talk and beyond: Children and teachers respond to literature. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
26. Schloss, P. J. (1992). Mainstreaming revisited. Elementary School Journal, 92, 233-244.
27. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Effective mainstreaming strategies for mildly handicapped students. Elementary School Journal, 92, 389-409.
28. Short, K. G., & Pierce, K. M. (1990). Talking about books: Creating literate communities. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
29. Straw, S. B. (1990). Reading and response to literature: Transactionalizing instruction. In S. Hynds & D. L. Rubin (Eds.), Perspectives on talk & learn-ing (pp. 129-148). Urbana, II: National Council of Teachers of English.
30. Throne, M. J. (1992). A special needs student in a reading/writing workshop. In J. W. Irwin & M. A. Doyle (Eds.), Reading/writing connections: Learning from research (pp. 223-244). Newark, DE: International Reading Associa-tion.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psycholog-ical processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.