Monitoring dynamic processes with alphanumeric and graphic displays

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 368-389

  Oron Gilad, Tal ^a,b   Meyer, Joachim ^b   Gopher, Daniel ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Dynamic information displays; Graphs; Monitoring; Tables

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008796737     PISSN: 1463922X     EISSN: 1464536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14639220110110315     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. CARSWELL, C. M. 1992, Choosing specifiers: an evaluation of the basic task models of gra-phical perception, Human Factors, 34, 535-554.
2. DESANCTIs, G. 1984, Computer graphics as decision aids: direction for research, Decision Sciences, 15, 463-487.
3. EFFKEN, J. A., KIM, N.-G. and SHAW, R. E. 1997, Making the constraints visible: testing the ecological approach to interface design, Ergonomics, 40, 1-27.
4. GOETTL, B. P., Wickens, c. D. and Kramer, a. F. 1991, Integrated displays and the perception of graphical data, Ergonomics, 34, 1047-1063.
5. Hansen, j. p. 1995, Representation of system invariants by optical invariants in configural displays for process control, in P. A. Hancock, J. M. Flach, J. Caird and K. J. Vicente (eds), Local Applications of the Ecological Approach to Human-Machine Systems, Vol. 2 (Hillsdale: Erlbaum), 208-233.
6. Hwang, m. L h. and Wu, b. j. p. 1990, The effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a meta-analytical integration of research findings, Data Base, 21, 11-20.
7. Jones, P. m., WICKENS, C. d. and DEUtsch, S. j. 1990, The display of multivariate information: an experimental study of an information integration task, Human Performance, 3, 1-17.
8. KUSKIN-SHAM°, m., Meyer, j. and Gopher, D. 1996, Predicting values and trends from tables and graphs, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society), 1151-1154.
9. Lohse, G. l. 1993, A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception, Human- Computer Interaction, 8, 353-388.
10. Meyer, j. 2000, Performance with tables and graphs: effects of training and a Visual Search Model, Ergonomics, 43, 1840-1865.
11. MEYER GOPHER d. and LEVY, J. 1997a, Discrimination between functions in tables and graphs, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society), 1348-1351.
12. MEYER, J., KUSKIN-SHAMO, M. and GOPHER, D. 1999, Information structure and the relative efficacy of tables and graphs, Human Factors, 41, 570-587.
13. MEYER J., SHINAR, d. and LEISER D. 1997b, Multiple factors that determine performance with tables and graphs, Human Factors, 39, 266-286.
14. MontazEMI, A. r. and WANG, S. 1989, The effects of modes of information presentation on decision making: a review and meta-analysis, Journal of Management Information Systems, 5, 101-126.
15. MORAY, N., LEE, J., VICENTE, K. J., JONES, B. G. and RASMUSSEN, J. 1994, A direct perception interface for nuclear power plants, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (Santa Monica: Human Factors Society).
16. NUGENT, w.A. and BROYLES j. w. 1992, Assessment of graphics and text formats for system status display, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (Santa Monica: Human Factors Society), 1464-1468.
17. NUTTEr, E. h. and CONVERSE S. 1992, Analog and digital displays for detect, diagnose and correct phases in fault management, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (Santa Monica: Human Factors Society), 1460-1463.
18. PAYNE, W., BETTMAN, J. R. and JOHNSON, E. J. 1988, Adaptive strategy selection in decision making, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, I4, 534-552.
19. RASMUSSEN, J. 1986, Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering (New York: North Holland).
20. Schaubroeck j. and Muralidhar, K. 1991, A meta-analysis of the relative effects of tabular and graphic display formats on decision making performance, Human Performance, 4, 127-145.
21. SCHWARZ, D. R. and HOWELL, W. C. 1985, Optional stopping performance under graphic and numeric CRT formatting, Human Factors, 27, 433-444.
22. VICENTE, K. J., MORAY, N., LEE, J. D., RASMUSSEN, J., JONES, B. G., BROCK, R. and DJEMIL, T. 1996, Evaluation of a Rankine Cycle Display for nuclear power plant monitoring and diagnostics, Human Factors, 38, 506-521.
23. Vicente, k. j. and RASMUSSEN, J. 1992, Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22, 589-605.
24. WICKENS c. d. and ANDRE A. d. 1990, Proximity compatibility and information display: effects of color, space and objectness on information integration, Human Factors, 32, 61-78.
25. WICKENS c. d. and CARSWELL c. M. 1995, The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design, Human Factors, 37, 473-494