Considering (irreconcilable?) contradictions in cross-group feminist research

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 629-660

  Young, Michelle D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008794293     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390050211556     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 19, 5-32.
2. Anderson, M. (1993). Studying across difference: Race, class and gender in qualitative research. In J. Stanfield & R. Dennis (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 39-52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Anzaldua, G. (Ed.). (1990). Making face, making soul/Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
4. Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248-261). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Austin, R. (1989). Sapphire bound! Wisconsin Law Review, 3, 539-578.
6. Banks, J.A. (1995). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational Researcher, 22(5), 4-14.
7. Barkan, E. (1992). The retreat of scientific racism: Changing concepts of race in Britain and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Behar, R. (1993). Translated woman: Crossing the border with Esperanza’s story. Boston, MA: Beacon.
9. Blauner, R., & Wellman, D. (1973). Toward the decolonization of social research. In J. Ladner (Ed.), The death of white sociology (pp. 310-330). New York: Vintage.
10. Butler, S., & Rosenblum, B. (1991). Cancer in two voices. San Francisco: Spinsters.
11. Cannon, L., Higginbotham, E., & Leung, M. (1991). Race and class bias in qualitative research on women. In M. M. Fonow & J.A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 107-118). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12. Caraway, N. (1991). Segregated sisterhood. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
13. Caulfield, M. (1984). Imperialism, the family and cultures of resistance. In A. Jagger & P. Rosenthal (Eds.), Feminist frameworks (pp. 374-379). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Chase, S.(1995). Ambiguous empowerment: The work narratives of women school superintendents. Amherst: University ofMassachusetts Press.
15. Chow, E. (1987). The development of feminist consciousness among Asian American women. Gender & Society, 1, 284-299.
16. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Clough, P. T. (1992). The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
19. Connolly, P. (1998). Introduction. In P. Connolly & B. Troyna (Eds.), Researching racism in education: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 1-11). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
20. Connolly, P., & Troyna, B. (1998). Researching racism in education: Politics, theory and practice. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
21. Crenshaw, K. (1992). Intersectionality of race and sex. Unpublished manuscript.
22. Davis, A. Y. (1978). Rape, racism and the capitalist setting. Black Scholar, 9, 24-30.
23. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Dill, B. (1979). The dialectics of black womanhood. Signs, 4, 543-555.
25. Dwyer, K. (1982). Moroccan dialogues: Anthropology in question. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Eisner, E. (1992). Objectivity in educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 22, 9-15.
27. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (1992). Telling and performing personal stories. In C. Ellis & M. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 79-101). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Flexner, E. (1975). Century of struggle. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
31. Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Back to the future: A look at the second wave offeminist epistemology and methodology. In M. M. Fonow &J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 1-15). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
32. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
33. Gebhardt, E.(1982). Introduction to Part III, A critique of methodology. In A. Arato & E. Gebhardt (Eds.), The essential Frankfurt School reader (pp. 371-406). New York: Continuum.
34. Gitlin, A., Siegel, M. & Boru, K. (1989). The politics of method: From leftist ethnography to educative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 2, 237-253.
35. Goldman, A. (1993). Is that what she said? The politics of collaborative autobiography. Cultural Critique, 177-204.
36. Gordon, E. W., Miller, F., & Rollock, D. (1990). Coping with communicentric bias in knowledge production in the social sciences. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 14-19.
37. Gorelick, S. (1991). Contradictions of feminist methodology. Gender & Society, 5, 459-477.
38. Green, R. (1980). Native American women. Signs, 6, 248-267.
39. Group for Collaborative Inquiry. (1993). The democratization ofknowledge. Adult Education Quarterly, 43(4), 1-8.
40. Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
41. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women' lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
42. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. NewYork: Free Press.
43. Herskovitz, M. (1967). Dahomey (Vol. 2). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
44. Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory from margin to center. Boston: South End.
45. Hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End.
46. Hooks, B. (1990). The politics of radical black subjectivity. In b. hooks (Ed.), Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics (pp. 15-22). Boston: South End.
47. Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color. Signs, 14, 833-855.
48. Kelly-Gadol, J. (1987). The social relation of the sexes: Methodological implications ofwomen’s history. In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 15-28). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
49. Kreiger, S. (1983). The mirror dance: Identity in a woman's community. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
50. Kreiger, S. (1991). Social science and the self: Personal essays on an art form. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
51. Ladner, J. (1971). Tomorrow's tomorrow: The black woman. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
52. Ladner, J. (1987). Tomorrow’s tomorrow: The black woman. In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 74-83). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
53. Laible, J. (1995, April). Crossing borders: The use of self-reexivity and collaboration by a Gringaas she speaks for others in Texas]Mexico border schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
54. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
55. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673-693.
56. Lather, P. (1994, February). A curriculum of angels: On (not) writing about the lives of women with HIV/ AIDS. Presentation conducted at the University of Texas, Austin.
57. Lesco, N. (1988). The curriculum of the body: Lessons from a Catholic high school. In L. Roman, L. Christian-Smith, & E. Ellsworth (Eds.), Becoming feminine: The politics of popular culture (pp. 123-142). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
58. Lewis, C., & Ketter, J. (1999, April). The construction of whiteness in readings of multicultural young adult literature. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
59. Light, L., & Kleiber, N. (1981). Interactive research in a feminist setting. In D. A. Messerschmidt (Ed.), Anthropologists at home in North America: Methods and issues in the study of one's own society (pp. 167-14). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Linden, R. (1993). Making stories, making selves: Feminist re ections on the Holocaust. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
61. Lorde, A. (1984). Scratching the surface: Some notes on barriers to women and loving. In A. Jagger & P. Rosenthal (Eds.), Feminist frameworks (pp. 432-436). New York: McGraw-Hill.
62. Matsuda, M. (1993). Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim's story. In M. Matsuda, C. Lawrence, R. Delgado, K. Crenshaug (Eds.), Words that wound (pp. 17-52). Boulder: Westview Press.
63. Mead, M. (1950). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: Mentor.
64. Merton, R. (1972) Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 44-47.
65. Middleton, S. (1984). On being a feminist educationist doing research on being a feminist educationist: Life history analysis as consciousness raising. New Zealand Cultural Studies Working Group Journal, 8, 29-37.
66. Miller, J.B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
67. Millman, M. (1986). Such a pretty face: Being fat in America. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Publishing.
68. Mirza, M. (1998). Same voices, same lives? Revisiting blackfeminist standpoint epistemology. In P. Connolly & B. Troyna (Eds.), Researching racism in education: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 79-94). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
69. Mohanty, C. (1991). Cartographies of struggle: Third world women and the politics of feminism. In C. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 1-47). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
70. Moreno, R. (1999, April). Predictors of parental involvement among Latina mothers and its relation to their children's school outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
71. Morrison, T. (1971, August). What the black woman thinks about women’s lib. New York Times Magazine, 14-15, 63-64, 66.
72. Moss, Z. (1984). It hurts to be alive and obsolete: The ageing woman. In A. Jagger & P. Rosenthal (Eds.), Feminist frameworks (pp. 66-69). New York: McGraw-Hill.
73. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
74. Olesen, V. (1994). Feminisms and models of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 158-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75. Patai, D. (1988). Constructing self: A Brazilian life story. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 143-166.
76. Piantanida, M., & Garmen, N. (1999). The qualitative dissertation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
77. Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78. Rebolledo, D. (1990). The politics of poetics: Or, what am I, a critic doing in this text anyhow? In G. Anzaldua (Ed.), Makingface, making soul haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color (pp. 346-355). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
79. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
80. Rhodes, P. (1994). Race of interviewer effects in qualitative research: A brief comment. Sociology, 28(2), 547-548.
81. Richardson, L. (1992). The consequences of poetic representation: Writing the other, rewriting the self. In C. Ellis & M. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 125-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
82. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
83. Rollins, J. (1985). Between women: Domestics and their employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
84. Romero, M. (1992). Maid in the USA. London: Routledge.
85. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
86. Said, E. (1985). In the shadow of the West. Wedge, 7/8, 4-5.
87. Said, E. (1989). Representing the colonized: Anthropology’s interlocutors. Critical Inquiry, 15, 205-225.
88. Sawicki, J. (1991). Foucault and feminism: Toward a politics of difference. In M. Shanley & C. Pateman (Eds.), Feminist interpretations and political theory (pp. 217-231). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
89. Sawicki, J. (1994). Foucault, feminism and questions ofidentity. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
91. Scheurich, J. J., & Young, M. D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased? Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4-16.
92. Scheurich, J. J., & Young, M. D. (1998). In the United States of America, in both our souls and our sciences we are avoiding white racism. Educational Researcher, 27(9), 27-32.
93. Schneider, J. (1991). Troubles with textual authority in sociology. Symbolic Interaction, 14, 295-320.
94. Shostak, M. (1981). Nisa: The life and words of a ! Kung woman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95. Smith, D. (1989). Sociological theory: Methods of writing patriarchy. In R. Wallace (Ed.), Feminism and sociological theory (pp. 34-64). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
96. Smith, D. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
97. Smith, D. (1992). Sociology from women’s experience: A reaffirmation. Sociological Theory, 10, 88-98.
98. Smith, D. (1993). High noon in Textland: A critique of Clough. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 183-192.
99. Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 280-316). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
100. Stanfield, J. (1985). The ethnocentric basis of social science knowledge production. Review of Research in Education, 12, 387-415.
101. Stanfield, J. (1993a). Epistemological considerations. In J. Stanfield & R. Dennis (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 16-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
102. Stanfield, J. (1993b). Methodological reflections: An introduction. In J. Stanfield & R. Dennis (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 3-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
103. Stanfield, J. (1994). Ethnic modeling in qualitative research. N Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 175-188). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
104. Standing, K. (1998). Writing the voices of the less powerful: Research on lone mothers. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: Public knowledge and private lives (pp. 186-202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
105. Stoller, E., & Oakes, C. (1987). In sorcery's shadow: A memoir of apprenticeship among the Songhay of Niger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
106. Tandon, R. (1982). A critique of monopolistic research. In B. Hall, A. Gillette, & R. Tandon (Eds.), Creating knowledge: A monopoly? Participatory research in development (pp. 79-84). New Dehli: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.
107. Tierny, W. (1995). Representation and voice. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(4), 379-390.
108. Tixier yVigil, Y., & Elasser, N. (1976). The effects of the ethnicity of the interviewer on conversation: A study of Chicana women. In B. DuBois & I. Crouch (Eds.), Sociology of the language of American women (pp. 161-169). San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press.
109. Trebilcot, J. (1988, Summer). Dyke methods, or principles for the discovery/creation of the withstanding. Hypatia, 3, 1-14.
110. Tuana, N. (1993). With many voices: Feminism and theoretical pluralism. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender/feminism on theory (pp. 122-140). Berkeley: University of California Press.
111. Tyler, S. (1986). Post-modern ethnography: From document ofthe occult to occult document. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 122-140). Berkeley: University of California Press.
112. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
113. West, C. (1993). Keeping faith: Philosophy and race in America. New York: Routledge.
114. Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
115. Wolf, D. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1-55). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
116. Wolf, M. (1992). A thrice-told tale: Feminism, post-modernism and ethnographic responsibility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
117. Young, M. D. (1997, April). Homeless mothers and their children's education Paper presented at the Annual Conference ofthe American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
118. Young, M. D. (in press). Multifocal educational policy research: Toward a method for enhancing traditional educational policy studies. American Educational Research Journal.
119. Young, M. D., & Moore, E. (1999, April). Pretty in print: The failure of Iowa's MC NS policy in addressing the educational needs of Black adolescent females. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
120. Zinn, M. (1982). Mexican-American women in the social sciences. Signs, 8, 259-272.