A comparison of woodcock–johnson psycho-educational battery-revised and qualitative reading inventory-ii instructional reading levels

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 279-289

  McCabe, Patrick P ^a   Margolis, Howard ^b   Barenbaum, Edna ^c  

^a ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c Cabrini University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008776313     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/105735601317095034     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Daub, D., & Colarusso, R. (1996). The validity of the WJ-R and DAB-2 reading subtests with students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11 (2), 90-95.
2. Donnellan, A. M. (1984). The criterion of least dangerous assumption. Behavior Disorders, 9, 141-150.
3. Falk, B. (1998). Testing the way children learn: Principles for valid literacy assessments. Language Arts, 76 (1), 57-66.
4. Howell, K. W., Fox, S. L., & Morehead, M. K. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation (Second ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
5. Kress, R. (1988). Some caveats when applying two trends in diagnosis: Remedial reading. ERIC' Digest Number 6 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 297 303; http: //erieae.net/edo/ED297303.htm).
6. Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (1995). Qualitative Reading Inventory-II. New York: Harper Collins.
7. Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1997). Assessment and instruction of reading disability: An interactive approach (Second ed.). NY: Longman.
8. Manzo, A. V., & Manzo, U. C. (1995). Teaching children to be literate. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovieh.
9. McCormick, S. (1999). Instructing students who have literacy problems (Third ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
10. Newcomer, P. L. (1986). Standardized reading inventory (manual). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
11. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1995). Assessment (Sixth ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Shanker, J. L., & Ekwall, E. E. (2000). Ekwall/Shanker Reading Inventory (Fourth ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Slate, J. R. (1996). Interrelations of frequently administered achievement measures in the determination of specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11 (2), 86-89.
14. Taylor, B., Harris, L. A., Pearson, P. D., & Garcia, G. (1995). Reading difficulties: Instruction and assessment (Second ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.
15. Tierney, R. J., Readence, J. E., & Dishner, E. K. (1995). Reading strategies and practices: A compendium. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Webster, R., & Braswell, L. (1991). Curriculum bias and reading achievement test performance. Psychology in the Schools, 28 (3), 193-198.
17. Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., Daly, E. D., Gresham, F. M., & Kramer, J. J. (1998). Assessment of at-risk and special needs children (Second ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
18. Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., Kramer, J. J., & Gresham, F. M. (1994). Assessment of children: Fundamental methods and practices. Madison, WI: WCB Brown & Benchmark.
19. Woodcock, R. W, & Johnson, M. B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Bat- tery-Revised, Examiner's manual. Chicago: Riverside.
20. Woodcock, R. W, & Mather, N. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery- Revised, Tests of Achievement, examiner's manual. Chicago: Riverside.