Work attitudes among israeli heroin addicts: A status model perspective

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Volumn 24, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 141-154

  Isralowttz, Richard E ^a   Abu Saad, Ismael ^a   Telias, Darwin ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008771841     PISSN: 10509674     EISSN: 15408558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J076v24n01_10     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ausubel, D. (1980). An interactionist approach to narcotic addiction. In D. Lettieri, M, Sayers, and H. Pearson (eds.), Theories on drug abuse: Selected contemporary perspectives. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 4-7.
2. Bachman, J., O’Malley, P. and Johnston, J. (1978). Adolescence to adulthood: Change and stability in the lives of young men. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center.
3. Bagozzi, R.P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 41, 607-627.
4. Baron, R. (1985). Understanding human relations. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Bentler, P.M., and Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychological Review, 86,452-464.
6. Bentler, P.M. and Speckart, G. (1981). Attitudes “cause” behaviors: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 226-238.
7. Best, F. (1973). The future of work, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
8. Bonito, A., Nurco, D., and Shaffer, J. (1976). Veridicality of the addicts’ self-reports in social research. International Journal of the Addictions, 11, 719-724.
9. Bumkrant, R.E. and Page, Jr., T.J. (1982). An examination of the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of Fishbein’s behavioral intention model. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 550-561.
10. Dube, K. (1981). The question of onymity and anonymity of a questionnaire in a drug use survey. Bulletin on Narcotics, 33(2):45-48.
11. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Flay, B. and Petraitis, J. (1991). Methodological issues in drug use prevention research: Theoretical foundations. In C. Lenkefeld and W. Bukoski, (1991) Drug abuse prevention intervention research; Methodological issues. Washington, DC: NIDA.
13. Fredricks, A.J. and Dossett, D.L. (1983). Attitude-behavior relations: A comparison of the Fishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 501-512.
14. Goldenberg, I. (1972). Employment and addiction: Perspective on existing business and treatment practices. Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Labor.
15. Goldstein, B. and Oldham, J. (1979). Children and work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
16. Goode, E. (1989). Drugs in American society (Third Edition), New York: Knopf.
17. Greenberg, S. and Stanger, T. (1991). Israel’s drug bomb: Heroin, cocaine and other narcotics take a toll in a country that was once thought to be immune. Newsweek. September 9, 29-30.
18. Hubbard, R., Henrick, H. and Monte, M. (1981). Vocational Services in NIDA-Funded Drug Treatment Programs. In A. Schecter (ed.) Drug Dependence and Alcoholism. New York: Plenum, 485-495.
19. Isralowitz, R., Telias, D. and Zighelbaum, Y. (1992). Heroin addiction in Israel: A comparison of addicts in prison, community-based facilities, and non-drug users based on selected psychological factors, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 36(1), 63-73.
20. Jessor, R and Jessor, S. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.
21. Jessor, R and Jessor, S. (1978). “Theory-testing in longitudinal research on marihua-na use.” In D. Kandel (ed.), Longitudinal research on drug use: Empirical findings and methodogical issues. New York: Halstead-Wiley, 1978.
22. Jessor, R and Jessor, S. (1980). A social-psychological framework from studying drug use. In D. Lettieri, M. Sayers, and H. Pearson (eds.), Theories on drug abuse: Selected contemporary perspectives. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 102-109.
23. Johnston, L., Bachman, J. and O’malley O (1979). Drugs and the class of 78: Behaviors, attitudes, and recent national Trends. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
24. Jurich, A. and Poison, C. (1984). Reasons for drug use: Comparison of drug users and abusers. Psychological Reports, 55:371-378.
25. Kandel, D. (1973). Adolescent marijuana use: Role of parents and peers, Science, 181 (4104): 1067-1070.
26. Kaplan, H. (1980). “Self-esteem and self-derogation theory of drug abuse.” In D. Lettieri, M. Sayers, and H. Pearson (eds.), Theories on drug abuse: Selected contemporary perspectives, Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 128-131.
27. Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research, 2d ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
28. Liska, A.E. (1974). Emergent issues in the attitude-behavior consistence controversy. American Sociological Review, 39, 261-272.
29. Luetguert, M. and Armstrong, A. (1973). Methodological issues in drug surveys: Anonymity, recency and frequency. International Journal of the Addictions. 8, 683-689.
30. Lukoff, I. (1974). Issues in the evaluation of heroin treatment. In E. Josephson et al. (eds.), Drug use: Epidemiological and sociological approaches. New York: Wiley, 129-157.
31. Manfredo, M. and Shelby, B. (1988). The effect of using self-report measures in tests of attitude-behavior relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 731-743.
32. Mandardt, P. (1972). Job orientation of male and female college graduates in business, Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 361-368.
33. Mills, C.W. (1973). The meanings of work throughout history. In F. Best (ed.). The future of work. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 6-16.
34. Maslow, A.H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.
35. Mercer, G. and Kohn, P. (1977). Values associated with marihuana use among college students. British Journal of Addiction, 72, 151-158.
36. Neff, W. (1968). Work and human behavior. New York: Atherton.
37. Robins, L. (1980). The natural history of drug abuse. In D. Lettieri, M. Sayers, and H. Pearson (eds.), Theories on drug abuse: Selected contemporary perspectives. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 215-224.
38. Samuel, Y. and Epstein, N. (1979). The occupational sites as a predictor of work values. American Journal of Sociology, 85,625-639.
39. Scher, J. (1970). Patterns and profiles of addiction and drug abuse. In J. McGrath et al. (eds.), Youth and drugs. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
40. Scher, J. (1991). A long-term answer to drag abuse. Jerusalem Post, September 5, 6.
41. Shore, M. (1985). Correlates and concepts: Are we chasing our tails? In Jones, C. and Bsattjes, R. (ed.). Etiology of drug abuse: Implications for prevention, Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse Research, Monograph 56, 127-135.
42. Smart, R. and Whitehead, P. (1974). The uses of an epidemiology of drug use: The Canadian scene. International Journal of the Addictions, 9:373-388.
43. Stephens, R. (1972). The truthfulness of addict respondents in research projects. International Journal of the Addictions, 7, 549-558.
44. Warshaw, P.R., Calantone, R. and Joyce, M. (1986). A field application of the Fishbein and Ajzen intention model. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 137-139.
45. Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant ethic and spirit of capitalism, T, Parsons (Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner.
46. Wurmser, L. (1980). Drug use as a protective system. In D. Lettieri, M. Sayers, and H. Pearson (eds.), Theories on drug abuse: Selected contemporary perspectives. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 71-74.