Psychoanalytic perspectives concerning the impact of managed care on psychotherapy

Psychoanalytic Social Work

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 61-77

  Waska, Robert T ^a  

^a San Francisco   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008770431     PISSN: 15228878     EISSN: 15229033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J032v06n02_04     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Earle, J. (1979). An approach to the study of analyzability and analyses: The course of forty consecutive cases selected for supervised analysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 48: 198.
2. Freud, A. (1954). The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis. Discussion. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2: 4: 607-620.
3. Gabbard, G. (1991). A psychodynamic perspective on the clinical fact of insurance review. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148: 3: 318-323.
4. Glover, E. (1955). The Technique of Psychoanalysis. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
5. Gray, S. (1973). Does insurance affect psychoanalytic practice? Bulletin of the Philadelphia Association for Psychoanalysis, 23: 101-110.
6. Halpert, E. (1972). The effects of insurance on psychoanalytic treatment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 20: 122.
7. Halpert, E. (1973). A meaning of insurance in psychotherapy. International Journal ofPsychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 1: 62-68.
8. Halpert, E. (1985). Insurance. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 33: 937.
9. Herron, W. & Welt, S. (1992). Money matters: The fee in psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10. Jackel, J (1981). (Unpublished manuscript).
11. Joseph, B. (1985). Transference: The total situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66: 447-54.
12. Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 21: 99-110.
13. Klein, M. (1935). A contribution to the psychogenisis of manic-depressive states. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 16: 145-74.
14. Novick, J. (1988). The Timing of Termination. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 15: 307.
15. Rotmann, J. (1994). Third party payment: Can its transference significance be analyzed? Annual of Psychoanalysis, 22: 145-172.
16. Rudominer, H. (1984). Peer review, third-party payment, and the analytic situation: A case report. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 32: 773.
17. Stone, L. (1954). The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2: 4: 567-594.