For whom is the library an anchor? Observations on library portals

Journal of Library Administration

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 5-17

  Michalko, James ^a  

^a Research Libraries Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008756665     PISSN: 01930826     EISSN: 15403564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J111v39n04_02     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Scott Carlson, “The Deserted Library, ”The Chronicle of Higher Education, 16 November 2001, http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i12/12a03501.htm (27 February2003).
2. Mark Young, Martha Kyrillidou, and Julia Blixrud, “ARL SupplementaryStatistics 2000-01, ” press release, ARL Webpage, 7 July 2002, http://www.arl.org/stats/announce/sup01pr.html (27 February 2003).
3. Sue Roppel, “Simon Fraser University Library Faculty Survey Results, ”Simon Fraser University Webpage, 7 June 2001, http://www.lib.sfu.ca/about/reports/survey2001/faculty_report.pdf (27 February 2003).
4. Neil Swidey, “A Nation of Voyeurs, ”The Boston Globe Magazine, 2 February2003, http://www.boston.com/globe/magazine/2003/0202/coverstory_entire.htm (27February 2003).
5. Scott Carlson, “Do Libraries Really Need Books, ”The Chronicle of HigherEducation, 12 July 2002, http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i44/44a03101.htm (27 February 2003).
6. Lynn Dagar and Leigh Watson Healy, “TrendAlert: What The Dot.Com Survivors Can Teach Us, ”Outsell Information Briefing, Outsell 60 Company Monitorvol. 2, no. 1, 17 January 2003.
7. Amy Friedlander, Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environment: Introduction to a Data Set Assembled by the Digital Library Federation andOutsell, Inc., (Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation Council on Library and Information Resources, 2002).
8. Scott Carlson, “Students and Faculty Turn to Online Library Materials Before Printed Ones, Study Finds, ”The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3 October 2003, http://chronicle.com/free/2002/10/2002100301t.htm (27 February 2003).
9. Debra Rundle, Princeton University Homepage, December 1999, http://www.princeton.edu/rundle/PrincetonPortal.htm (27 February 2003).
10. Amos Lakos, “Personalized Library Portals and Organisational Change, ”Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of European University Information Systems, Berlin Humboldt-University, March, 2001 (EUNIS 2001).http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/abstract.php3?id=3000600lang=eng (27 February 2003).
11. Association of Research Libraries (ARL), “Portal Functionality Provided byARL Libraries: Preliminary Results of an ARL Survey, April 11, 2002, ”ARL Webpage, http://www.arl.org/access/scholarsportal/prelim.html#fn (27 February 2003).
12. Richard N. Katz, “It’s a Bird. It’s a Plane. It’s a Portal?”EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 38:3 (2000), 10-11. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eq/a003/eqm0038.pdf (27February 2003).
13. Florence Olsen, “U. of Michigan Cancels a Closely Watched Portal Project, ”The Chronicle of Higher Education, 11 April 2002. http://chronicle.com/free/2002/04/2002041101t.htm (27 February 2003).
14. Paula Kaufman, “Whose Good Old Days Are These? A Dozen Predictionsfor the Digital Age, ”Journal of Library Administration, vol. 35, no. 3, 2001, 5-19.
15. Lee Rainie, Max Kalehoff and Dan Hess, “College Students and the Web, ”PewInternet & American Life Project Data Memo, September 2002.http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=73.
16. Steve Jones, “The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future with Today’s Technology, ”Pew Internet & American Life Project, 15September 2002. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=71 (27 February 2003).
17. Amanda Lenhart, Maya Simon, Mike Graziano, “The Internetand Education: Findings of the Pew Internet & American Life Project, ”Pew Internet &American Life Project, 1 September 2001.
18. Douglas Levin and Sousan Arafeh, “The Digital Disconnect: The WideningGap Between Internet-Savvy Students and Their Schools, ”Pew Internet & AmericanLife Project, 14 August 2002.