Negative concord in the Old and New World: Evidence from Scotland

Language Variation and Change

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 109-134

  Smith, Jennifer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008540109     PISSN: 09543945     EISSN: 14698021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0954394501132011     Document Type: Article

References (121)

1. Adams, K. (1992). Accruing power on debate floors. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power (pp. 1-10). Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Adams, K., & Edelsky, E. (1988). Male and female styles in political debates. In Ferrara et al. (Eds.), Linguistic change and contact. Austin: University of Texas Press. 18-24.
3. Adams, K., (1990). Creating inequality: Breaking the rules in debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9: 171-190.
4. Atwood, M. (1979). Life before man. New York: Fawcett.
5. Atwood, M. (1983). Bluebeard's Egg. New York: Fawcett.
6. M. Atwood. Toronto: Random House. Language style as audience design.
7. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145-204.
8. Bell, A. (1991a). Audience of accommodation in the mass media. In H. Giles, N. Coupland, & J. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 69-102.
9. Bell, A. (1991b). Language in the news media. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Bell, A. (1992). Hit and miss: Referee design in the dialects of New Zealand television advertisements. Language and Communication 12: 327-342.
11. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Biber, D. (1994). An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Perspectives on register: Situating register variation within sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 31-56.
13. Bladon, A., Carlson, R., Granstrom, B., Hunnicutt, S., & Karlsson, I. (1987). A test-to-speech system for British English and issues of dialect and style. In J. Laver & M. Jack (Eds.), European conference on speech technology: Vol. 1. Edinburgh: CEP Consultants. 55-58.
14. Bolinger, D. (1978). Intonation across languages. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language: Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 471-524.
15. Brazil, D. (1984). The intonation of sentences read aloud. In D. Gibbon & H. Richter (Eds.), Intonation, accent and rhythm. Berlin: de Gruyter. 46-66.
16. Brazil, D. (1985). The communicative value of intonation in English. Birmingham: English Language Research.
17. Brown, G. (1983). Prosodic structures and the given/new distinction. In A. Cutler & R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 67-77.
18. Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 253-276.
19. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals of language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 256-289.
20. Bruce, G. (1992). On the analysis of prosody in spontaneous speech. Speech Communication 11: 453-458.
21. Brunei, G. (1970). Le frangais radiophonique à Montreal. Master's thesis, Università de Montreal.
22. Button, G. (1987). Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 160-171.
23. Cahn, J. (1990). The generation of affect in synthesized speech. J. American Voice I/O Soc 8: 1-19.
24. Carlson, L. (1984). Focus and dialogue games. In L. VaIn A & J. Hintikka (Eds.), Cognitive constraints on communication. Dordrecht: Reidel. 295-333.
25. Carlson, R., Granström, B., & Hunnicutt, S. (1990). Multilingual text-to-speech development and applications. In A. Ainsworth (Ed.), Advances in speech, hearing and language processing. London: JAI. 269-296.
26. Cheshire, J., Edwards, V., & Whittle, P. (1989). Urban British dialect grammar. English World Wide 10: 185-225.
27. Clayman, S. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems 35: 474-492.
28. Clayman, S. (1992). Footing in the achievement of reality. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 163-198.
29. Cleary, B. (1968). Ramona the pest. New York: Scholastic Books. [1990. Read by S. Channing. Listening Library.
30. Cleary, B. (1981). Ramona Quimby, age 8. New York: Dell.
31. Coker, C., & Umeda, N. (1971). Toward a theory of stress and prosody in American English. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Acoustics. Budapest. 137-140.
32. Coupland, N. (1980). Style shifting in a Cardiff work setting. Language and Society 9: 1-12.
33. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examIn Ation. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Engstrand, O. (1989). F0 correlates of tonal word accents in spontaneous speech: Range and sys-tematicityof variation. Phonetic Experimental Research, Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm (PERILUS) 10: 1-12.
35. Engstrand, O. (1992). Systematicity of phonetic variation in natural discourse. Speech Communication 11: 337-346.
36. Fant, G., & Kruckenberg, A. (1989). PrelimIn Aries to the study of Swedish prose reading and reading style. STL-QPSR 2.
37. Finegan, E. (1994). Language: Its structure and use. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
38. Finegan, E., & Biber, D. (1994). Parallel patterns in social dialect and register variation: Towards an integrated theory. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Perspectives on register: Situating register variation within sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 315-350.
39. Fonollosa, M.-O. (1995). The representation of spoken French in Quebec theater. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXIV, University of Pennsylvania.
40. Fowler, C. A. (1988). Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech 31: 307-319.
41. Fowler, C. A., 8c Housum, J. (1987). Talkers'signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26: 489-504.
42. Ghadessy, M. (Ed.). (1993). Register analysis: Theory and practice. London: Pinter.
43. Goffman, E. (1967). The presentation of self In everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
44. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
46. Goldberg, J. (1978). Amplitude shift: A mechanism for the affiliation of utterances in conversational interaction. In J. Schenkcin (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic.
47. Goodwin, M. (1992). He-said-she-said. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
48. Granström, B. (1992). Use of speech synthesis in exploring different speech styles. Speech Communication 11: 347-356.
49. Granström, B., & Nord, A. (1992). Neglected dimensions of speech synthesis. Speech Communication 11: 459-462.
50. Greatbatch, D. (1992). The management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 268-301.
51. Halliday, M. (1992). How do you mean? In L. Ravelli & M. Davies (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics. London: Pinter.
52. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
53. Halliday, M., (1989). Language, context and text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Hazen, K. (1995). Linguistic preference and prescriptive dictum: On the phonological and morphological justification of ain't. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXIII.
55. Hazen, K. (1996). Linguistic preference and prescriptine dictum. In J. Arnold et al. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis. Stanford: CSLI. 101-112.
56. Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 3. London: Academic. 95-117.
57. Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure. Cambridge: Polity. 47-98.
58. Hindle, D. (1979). The social and situational conditioning of phonetic variation. Doctoral thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
59. Hirschberg, J. (1990). Accent and discourse context: Assigning pitch accent in synthetic speech: The given/new distinction and deaccentability. Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 952-957.
60. Hirschberg, J. (1992). Prosodic variation for text-to-speech synthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94: 1841 (A).
61. Hirschberg, J., & Grosz, B. (1994). Intonation and discourse structure in spontaneous and read direction giving. In Proceedings of the international symposium on prosody. Yokohama. 103-109.
62. Hirschberg, J., & Litman, D. (1990). Disambiguating cue phrases in text and speech. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
63. Hirschbuhler, P., & Labelle, M. (1994). Changes in verb position in French negative infinitival clauses. Language Variation and Change 6: 149-178.
64. Hutchby, I. (1992a). The pursuit of controversy: Routine skepticism in talk on talk radio. Sociology 26: 673-694.
65. Hutchby, I. (1992b). Confrontation talk: Aspects of “interruption” in argument sequences on talk radio. Text 12: 343-371.
66. Jacobs, S. (1992). Argumentation without advocacy. In F. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. Blair, & C. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation illumIn Ated. Dordrecht: SICSAT. 270-280.
67. Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1992). Relevance and digression in argumentative discussion. Argumentation 6: 161-172.
68. Jones, K. (1994). Masked negotiation in a Japanese work setting. In A. Firth (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon.
69. Keillor, G. (1985). Lake Wobegon days. New York: Penguin. [1986. Read by G. Keillor. Minnesota Public Radio. J.
70. Koopmans-Van Beinum, F. (1992). The role of focus words in natural and synthetic continuous speech. Speech Communication 11: 439-452.
71. Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45: 715-762.
72. Keillor, G. (1985). Lake Wobegon days. New York: Penguin. [1986. Read by G. Keillor. Minnesota Public Radio.].
73. Koopmans-Van Beinum, F. (1992). The role of focus words in natural and synthetic continuous speech. Speech Communication 11: 439-452.
74. Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45: 715-762.
75. Labov, W. (1989). Exact description of the speech community. In R. Fasold & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Language change and variation. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 1-57.
76. Labov, W. (1994). Foundations of linguistic change. Oxford: Blackwell.
77. Leech, G. (1980). Exploration in semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
78. Lennig, M. (1978). Acoustic measurements of linguistic change: The modern Paris vowel system. Philadelphia: U. S. Regional Survey.
79. Levin, H., Schaffer, C., & Snow, C. (1982). The prosodic and paralinguistic features of reading and telling stories. Language and Speech 25: 43-54.
80. Liberman, M. (1992). Comments on various papers, IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech, IRCS Technical Report 92-97.
81. Mendoza-Denton, N. (1996). Multiple membership and stance taking in LatIn A adolescents'conversation. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXIII.
82. Mulkay, M. (1986). Agreement and disagreement in conversations and letters. Text 5: 201-227.
83. Nevalainen, T. (1987). Adverbial focusing and intonation. Lingua 73: 141-165.
84. Nevalainen, T. (1992). Intonation and discourse type. Text 12: 397-427.
85. Newell, S., & Stutman, L. (1988). The expression of dissatisfaction. Communication Monographs 55: 266-285.
86. Nooteboom, S. G., & Kruyt, J. G. (1987). Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: An experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82: 1512-1524.
87. Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. New York: Academic. 51-80.
88. O'Shaughnessy, D., & Allen, J. (1983). Linguistic modality effects on fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74: 1155-1171.
89. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Pomerantz, A. (1989). Constructing skepticism. Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 293-314.
91. Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic. 223-256.
92. Rickford, J., & McNair-Knox, F. (1994). Addressee and topic influenced style shift. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Perspectives on register: Situating register variation within sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 235-276.
93. Schegloff, E. (1989). From interview to confrontation: Observations of the Bush-Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 215-240.
94. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). Preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361-382.
95. Schiffrin, D. (1984). Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13: 311-335.
96. Schilling-Estes, N., & Wolfram, W. (1994). Convergent explanation and alternative regularization patterns: Were/weren't leveling in a vernacular English variety. Language Variation and Change 6: 273-302.
97. Selling, M. (1988). The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling in sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 293-322.
98. Selling, M. (1994). Emphatic speech style— With special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 375-408.
99. Selling, M. (1995). Prosody as an activity type distinctive cue in conversation: 'Astonished'questions in repair initiation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Shockey, L. (Ed.). (1995). University of Reading Speech Research Laboratory Work in Progress 8. Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading, Whiteknights.
101. Svartvik, J. (1990). (Ed.). The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English. Lund: Lund University Press.
102. Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
103. Tannen, D. (1985). Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In D. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 124-147.
104. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Tottie, G. (1983). Much about 'not'and 'nothing': A study about the variation between analytic and synthetic negation in contemporary American English. Lund: CWK Gleerup.
106. Tottie, G. (1987). Rejections, denials and explanatory statements. Studia Linguistica 4: 154-164.
107. Tottie, G. (1991). Negation in English speech and writing. San Diego: Academic.
108. Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
109. Tyler, A. (1988). Breathing lessons. [1990. Read by J. Eikenberry. New York: Random House.].
110. Ure, J. (Ed.). (1982). Issue on the Study of Register Range. International Journal of the Sociology of Linguistics 35.
111. Vincent, D., & Sankoff, G. (1977). L'cmploi productif du 'ne'dans le frangais montrdalais. Le Francois Moderne 45: 244-256.
112. Wharton, E. (1917 [1981]). Summer. New York: Berkley.
113. Yaeger, M. (1974). Speaking style: Some etic realizations and their significance. Pennsylvania Working Papers on Linguistic Change and Variation I.
114. Yaeger, M. (1979). Context-determined variation in Montreal French vowels. Doctoral thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
115. Yaeger-Dror, M. (1985). Intonational prominence on negatives in English. Language and Speech 28: 197-230.
116. Yaeger-Dror, M. (1988). The influence of changing group vitality on convergence toward a domIn Ant linguistic norm. Language and Communication 8: 285-306.
117. Yaeger-Dror, M. (1993). Linguistic analysis of dialect 'correction'and its interaction with cognitive salience. Language Variation and Change 5: 189-224.
118. Yaeger-Dror, M. (1996a). Register as a variable in prosodic analysis: The case of the English negative. Speech Communication 19 (in press).
119. Yaeger-Dror, M. (1996b). Intonation and register variation. Paper presented at NVVAVE-XXIII.
120. Yaeger-Dror, M., & Nunamaker, J. (1992). Negatives and Register. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: S3288(A).
121. Zwicky, A., & Pullum, G. (1982). Cliticization vs. inflection: English It. Bloomington: 1ULC.