Paternal power in late antiquity

Journal of Roman Studies

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 147-165

  Arjava, Antti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008536921     PISSN: 00754358     EISSN: 1753528X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0075435800044154     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. J. F. Gardner, Being a Roman Citizen (1993), 32-84.
2. R. P. Sailer, ‘Patria potestas and the stereotype of the Roman family’, Continuity and Change 1 (1986), 7-22.
3. idem, Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family (1994), 71-153.
4. E. Sachers, ‘Potestas patria’, RE xxn (1953), 1046-1175.
5. D. Dalla, ‘Aspetti della patrià potesta e dei rapporti tra genitori e figli nell'epoca postclassica’, Atti dell'Accademia Romanistica Costantiniana: VII Convegno intemazionale (1988), 89-109.
6. L. Mitteis, Reichsrecht und Volksrecht in den östlichen Provinzen des römischen Kaiserreichs (1891, repr. 1935. 1963). 209-212.
7. R. Taubenschlag, ‘Die Patria potestas im Recht der Papyri’, ZRG 37 (1916), 177-230, esp. 207-230.
8. D. Daube, Roman Law: Linguistic, Social and Philosophical Aspects (1969), 75-91.
9. A. Watson, Society and Legal Change (1977), 23-30.
10. Y. Thomas, ‘The division of the sexes in Roman law’, in P. S. Pantel (ed.), A History of Women in the West, I. From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints (1992), 83-137, at 90-111.
11. ‘Men's age at marriage and its consequences in the Roman family’, CPh 82 (1987), 21-34.
12. T. G. Parkin, Demography and Roman Society (1992), esp. 70-85;.
13. R. S. Bagnall and B. W. Frier, The Demography of Roman Egypt (1994), esp. 75-110.
14. Y. Thomas, ‘Droit domestique et droit politique à Rome: Remarques sur le pecule et les honores des fils de famille’, MEFRA 94 (1982), 527-80;.
15. A. Kirschenbaum, Sons, Slaves and Freedmen in Roman Commerce (1987).
16. M. Kaser, Das römische Privatrecht, I: Das altrömis-che, das vorklassische und klassische Recht (2nd edn, t-ITt), 344;.
17. R. P. Sailer, ‘Pietas, obligation and authority in the Roman family’, in P. Kneissel and V. Losemann (eds), Alte Geschichte und Wissenschaftsges-chichte: Festschrift für K. Christ (1988), 393-410, at 396-7, 407-8.
18. P. Garnsey and R. P. Sailer, The Roman Empire: Economy, Society and Culture (1987), 47-8.
19. P. Garnsey (ed.), Non-Slave Labour in the Greco-Roman World (1980).
20. F. La Rosa, Ipeculii speciali in diritto romano (1953).
21. B. Lehmann, ‘Das Eigenvermögen der römischen Sold-aten unter väterlicher Gewalt’, ANRW 11.14 (1982), 183-284.
22. E. Stein, Untersuchungen über das Officium der Prätorianerpräfektur seit Diokletian (1922), 14-16.
23. A. Boak, ‘Officium’, RE xvii (1936), 2045-2056.
24. A. H. M. Jones, ‘The Roman civil service (clerical and subclerical grades)’, in idem, Studies in Roman Government and Law (1960), 153-175;.
25. K. L. Noetlichs, Beamtentum und Dienstvergehen: Zur Staatsverwaltung in der Spatantike (1981), 20-34.
26. B. Lehmann, ‘Das “peculium castrense” der “palatini”’, Labeo 23 (1977), 49-54.
27. W. Ensslin, ‘Palatini’, RExvm.i (1942), 2529-60, esp. 2536-40.
28. C. Schott, ‘Der Stand der Leges-Forschung’, Frühmittelalterliche Studien 13 (1979), 29-55.
29. E. Levy, West Roman Vulgar Lato: The Law of Property (1951), 210-19.
30. M. Humbert, Le Remariage à Rome (1972), 207-63;.
31. J. F. Gardner, ‘Another family and an inheritance: Claudius Brasidas and his ex-wife's will’, LCM 12 (1987), 52-54;.
32. E. Champlin, Final Judgments: Duty and Emotion in Roman Wills 200 B.C.-A.D. 250 (1991), 125-6;.
33. P. Fuenteseca, ‘Maternum patrimonium (Revision de CTh. 8,18,1 y 8,18,2)’, Atti dell'Accademia Romanistica Costantini-ana: IX Convegno intemazionale (1993), 331-47.
34. Humbert, Atti dell'Accademia Romanistica Costantini-ana: IX Convegno intemazionale. (n. 23), 246-52.
35. P. E. Corbett, The Roman Law of Marriage (1930), 53-67, 122-5.
36. J. F. Gardner, Women in Roman Law and Society (1986), 10-11, 41-4.
37. S. Treggiari, ‘Consent to Roman marriage: some aspects of law and reality’, EMC/CV 26 (1982), 34-44.
38. eadem, Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian (1991), 459-461, 476-482.
39. Arjava, WLL, 29-41, 44-46.
40. Kaser, Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. (n. 7), 341-342.
41. idem, Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. (n. 17), 204.
42. Voci, Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian (n. 2, 1980), 60-61, 66-74.
43. Y. Thomas, ‘Vitae necisque potestas. Le père, la cite, la mort‘, in Du chatiment dans la cité: Supplices corporels et peine de mort dans le monde antique (Coll. EFR 79, 1984), 499-548;.
44. W. V. Harris, ‘The Roman father‘s power of life and death’, in R. S. Bagnall and W. V. Harris (eds), Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. A. Schiller (1986), 81-95.
45. Sailer, Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. A. Schiller (n. 7, 1988), 395-6.
46. Sailer, Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. A. Schiller. (n. 1, 1994), 115-17.
47. J. Goody, The Oriental, the Ancient, and the Primitive: Systems of Marriage and the Family in the Pre-Industrial Societies of Eurasia (1990), 405.
48. B. Rawson (ed.), Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome (1991), 144-65.
49. E. Eyben, ‘Fathers and sons’, Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome. 114-43;.
50. Sailer, Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome. (n. 1, 1994), 142-53.
51. B. D. Shaw, ‘The family in Late Antiquity: the experience of Augustine’, Past and Present 115 (1987), 3-51, at 19-26.
52. S. Poque, Le Langage symbolique dans la prédication d'Augustin d'Hippone: Images heroiques (1984), 193-224.
53. P. Gamsey, ‘Sons, slaves-and Christians’, in B. Rawson and P. Weaver (eds), The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space (1997).
54. Gardner, The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space (n. 32), 183-90.
55. Kaser, The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space. (n. 17), 14-21.
56. W. Selb, Zur Bedeutung des syrisch-rSmischen Rechtsbuchs (1964), 72-86.
57. K. Zeumer, ‘Geschichte der westgotischen Gesetzgebung IV’, Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde 26 (1901), 91-149, at 138-46.
58. P. D. King, Law and Society in the Visigothic Kingdom (1972), 246-7.
59. Arjava, WLL, 72, 97-98.
60. J. Gonzàlez, ‘The Lex Irnitana: a new copy of the Flavian municipal law’, JRS 76 (1986), 147-243.
61. T. Honoré, Emperors and Lawyers (2nd edn, 1994).
62. L. Huchthausen, ‘Herkunft und okonomische Stellung weiblicher Adressaten von Reskripten des Codex Iustinianus (2. und 3. Jh. u.Z.)’, Klio 56 (1974), 199-228;.
63. E. Volterra, ‘II senatoconsulto Orfiziano e la sua applicazione in documenti egiziani del III secolo d.C.’, in Atti dell‘XI congresso intern, di papirologia (1966), 551-585, at 576-585.
64. H. Chantraine, Freigelassene und Sklaven int Dienst der römischen Kaiser, Studien zu ihrer Nomenklatur (1967), 35-41;.
65. J. Rowlandson, Landowners and Tenants in Roman Egypt: The Social Relations of Agriculture in the Oxyrhynchite Nome (1996), 194.
66. Taubenschlag, Landowners and Tenants in Roman Egypt: The Social Relations of Agriculture in the Oxyrhynchite Nome (n. 3, 1916), 207-214, 223-230.
67. Kaser, Landowners and Tenants in Roman Egypt: The Social Relations of Agriculture in the Oxyrhynchite Nome (n. 7) 352-372.
68. idem, Landowners and Tenants in Roman Egypt: The Social Relations of Agriculture in the Oxyrhynchite Nome (n. 17), 222-37.
69. D. Hagedorn, ‘Noch einmal zum Volljäh-rigkeitsalter in Ägypten nach der Constitutio Antoniniana’, ZPE 113 (1996), 224-6.
70. R. Yaron, ‘Syro-Romana’, Iura 17 (1966), 114-164.
71. Kaser, Iura. (n. 17), 49-50.
72. A. Watson, ‘Private law in the rescripts of Carus, Carinus and Numerianus’, TRG 41 (1973), 19-34, at 23.
73. A. Watson, TRG. (n. 4), 24-25.
74. Gardner, TRG. (n. 1), 71-72.
75. Zeumer, TRG. (n. 45), 110-112, 146-148.
76. King, TRG (n. 45), 243-4.
77. E. Meyer-Marthaler, Römisches Recht in Rätien im friihen und hohen Mittelalter, Beihefte der Sweitzerischen Zs. Für Geschichte 13 (1968), esp. 131-138.