Phonological variation and Optimality Theory: Evidence from word-initial vowel epenthesis in Vimeu Picard

Language Variation and Change

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 253-303

  Auger, Julie ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008533130     PISSN: 09543945     EISSN: 14698021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0954394501133016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Antilla, A. (1995). How to derive variation from grammar. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Language Variation and Linguistic Theory, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
2. Bailey, C.-J. (1972). The integration of linguistic theory: Internal reconstruction and the comparative method in descriptive analysis. In R. Stockwell & R. Macaulay (Eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 22-31.
3. Bailey, C.-J. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
4. Clements, G. (1990). Place of articulation in consonants and vowels: A unified theory. In B. Laks & A. Railland (Eds.), L’ architecture et la gdomitrie dcs representationsphonologiques. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
5. Ganiev, Z. (1971). On pronunciation of workers bom in Moscow. In Razvitie fonetiki sovremennogo russkogojazyka, Volume 2, G. Panov (Ed.). Moscow: Nauka, Russian Language Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences.
6. Goldsmith J. (1993). Harmonic phonology. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The last phonological rule: Reflections on constraints and derivations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 21-60.
7. Hume, E. (1992). Front vowels, coronal consonants, and their interaction in nonlinear phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
8. Jakobson, R. (1929). Remarques sur L'évolution Phonologique du Russe Comparde & Celle des Autres Langues Slaves. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 2. (Reprinted in Selected Writings, Volume 1.).
9. Kiparsky, P. (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1-136). Tokyo: Taikusha.
10. Kiparsky, P. (1985). Phonological change. In F. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 363-415.
11. Kiparsky, P. (1993). Variable rules. Paper presented at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop #1, New Brunswick, NJ.
12. Kiparsky, P. (1995). Phonological basis of sound change. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13. Kroch, A. (1989). Function and grammar in the history of English periphrastic do. In R. Fasold & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Language variation and change. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 52.) Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 133-172.
14. Krisin, V. (Ed.). (1974). Russkij jazyk po dannym massovogo obsledovanija. Moscow: Nauka, Russian Language Institute and Academy of Sciences. Panov, G. (Ed.). (1968). Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazika. Moscow: Nauka.
15. Labov, W. (1972). The internal evolution of linguistic rules. In R. Stockwell & R. Macaulay (Eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 101-171.
16. Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Liberman, M. (1994). Optimality and optionality. Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
18. McCarthy, J. (1986). OCP effects: GemIn Ation and antigemIn Ation. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207-263.
19. McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1993a). Prosodic morphology 1: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and Rutgers University.
20. McCarthy, J., (1993b). Generalized alignment. In G. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
21. McCarthy, J., (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. In M. Gonzalez (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 24. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
22. Mohanan, K. (1993). Fields of attraction in phonology. In G. Goldsmith (Ed.), The last phonological rule: Reflections on constraints and derivations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 61-116.
23. Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Manuscript, Rutgers University, and the University of Colorado at Boulder.
24. Reynolds, B. (1994). Variation and Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
25. Reynolds, B., & Nagy, N. (1994). Variation in Faetar. An Optimality account. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXIII, Stanford.
26. Rubach, J. (1984). Cyclic and lexical phonology: The structure of Polish. In Studies in generative grammar, Volume 17. Dordrecht: Foris.
27. Rubach, J., & Booij, G. (1990). Syllable structure assignment in Polish. Phonology 7, 121-158.
28. Selkirk, E. (1990). A two-root theory of length. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
29. Smolensky, P. (1984). Harmony theory: Thermal parallel models in a computational context. Technical Report 8404, Institute for Cognitive Science, Univ. of California at San Diego. In P. Smolensky & M. Riley (Eds.), Harmony theory: Problem solving, parallel cognitive models, and thermal physics.
30. Smolensky, P. (1993). Harmony, markedness and phonological activity. Handout, Rutgers Optimality Workshop #1.
31. Stampe, D. (1979). A dissertation in natural phonology. New York: Garland.
32. Zubritskaya, K. (1994). The categorical and variable phonology of Russian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
33. Zubritskaya, K. (1995). Palatalization mutations as coalescence in correspondence mode! of OT. Paper presented at the 4th meeting of the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, Cornell University, Ithaca.