The acquisition of verbal morphology by Chinese learners of Hungarian

Language Variation and Change

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 55-77

  Langman, Juliet ^a   Bayley, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008522433     PISSN: 09543945     EISSN: 14698021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0954394502141032     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Atkinson, Richard, Bower, Gordon, & Crothers, Edward. (1965). An introduction to mathematical learning theory. New York: Wiley.
2. Bailey, C.-J. (1973). Variationandlinguistictheory. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
3. Bates, Elizabeth. (1976). Languageandcontext: Theacquisitionofpragmatics. New York: Academic.
4. Battye, Adrian, & Roberts, Ian. (1995). Introduction. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change. New York: Oxford University Press. 1-30.
5. Behrens, Heike. (1993). Temporal reference in German child language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
6. Berwick, Robert. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Berwick, Robert, & Niyogi, Partha. (1996). Learning from triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 605-622.
8. Bloom, Paul. (1993). Grammatical continuity in language development: The case of subjectless sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 721-734.
9. Bloomfield, Leonard. (1927). Review of J. O. H. Jespersen, The philosophy of grammar. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 26: 244-246.
10. Brown, Roger. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Bush, Robert, & Mosteller, Frederic. (1951). A mathematical model for simple learning. Psychological Review 68: 313-323.
12. Bush, Robert, & Mosteller, Frederic. (1958). Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley.
13. Caselli, CristIn A, Casadio, Paola, & Bates, Elizabeth. (1999). A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian. Journal of Child Language 26: 69-111.
14. Chomsky, Noam. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.
15. Chomsky, Noam. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
16. Chomsky, Noam. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
17. Clark, Robin. (1992). The selection of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition 2: 83-149.
18. Clark, Robin, & Roberts, Ian. (1993). A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299-345.
19. Crain, Stephen, & Nakayama, Mineharu. (1987). Structure dependency in grammar formation. Language 63: 522-543.
20. Dresher, Bezalel Elan. (1999). Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 27-67.
21. Gibson, Edward, & Wexler, Kenneth. (1994). Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 355-407.
22. Gold, E. Mark. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10: 447-474.
23. Hawkins, John. (1985). A comparative typologyof English and German. Austin: University of Texas Press.
24. Hockett, Charles. (1968). Thestate of the art. The Hague: Mouton.
25. Hyams, NIn A. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
26. Hyams, NIn A, & Wexler, Kenneth. (1993). On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 421-459.
27. Kiparsky, Paul. (1997). The rise of positional licensing. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters andmorphosyntactic change. New York: Cambridge University Press. 460-494.
28. Kohl, Karen. (1999). An analysis of finite parameter learning in linguistic spaces. Master's thesis, MIT.
29. Kroch, Anthony. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199-244.
30. Kroch, Anthony, & Taylor, Ann. (1997). Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters andmorphosyn-tactic change. New York: Cambridge University Press. 297-325.
31. Kroch, Anthony, Taylor, Ann, & Ringe, Donald. (2000). The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. In Susan Herring et al. (eds.), Textual parameters in older language. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 353-391.
32. Lewontin, Richard. (1983). The organism as the subject and object of evolution. Scientia 118: 65-82.
33. Lightfoot, David. (1991). How to set parameters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Lightfoot, David. (1997). Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalyses. In Ans van Kemenade& Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters and morphosyntactic change. New York: Cambridge University Press. 253-272.
35. MacWhinney, Brian, & Snow, Catherine. (1985). The Child Language Date Exchange System. Journal of Child Language 12: 271-296.
36. Mayr, Ernst. (1963). Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Narendra, Kumpati, & Thathachar, Mandayam. (1989). Learning automata. Englewood Cliifs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38. Niyogi, Partha, & Berwick, Robert. (1995). The logical problem of language change. Manuscript, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
39. Norman, Frank. (1972). Markov processes and learning models. New York: Academic.
40. O'Grady, William. (1997). Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Pierce, Amy. (1989). On the emergence ofsyntax: A crosslinguisticstudy. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
42. Pintzuk, Susan. (1991). Phrase structure in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
43. Roberts, Ian. (1993). Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
44. Santorini, Beatrice. (1992). Variation and change in Yiddish subordIn Ate clause word order. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 595-640.
45. Valian, Virginia. (1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40: 21-82.
46. Vance, Barbara. (1989). Null subjects and syntactic change in Medieval French. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
47. van Kemenade, Ans. (1987). Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
48. Wang, Qi, Lillo-Martin, Diane, Best, Catherine, & Levitt, Andrew. (1992). Null subject vs. null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition 2: 221-254.
49. Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkeil (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press. 95-188.
50. Wexler, Kenneth, & Culicover, Peter. (1980). Formalprinciplesof languageacquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Yang, Charles D. (1999a). Formalizing language development. In Proceedings of the 35thmeetingof the Chicago Linguistics Society Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
52. Yang, Charles D. (1999b). A selectionist theory of language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 37th meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Washington, DC: The Association for Computational Linguistics. 272-279.
53. Yang, Charles D. (2000). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.